>>127662419 (OP) >dogshit tier rock
I disagree, I'd say 70% of the rock he played was very good and I listen tons of his program from 70s, 80s, 90s, 00s. Maybe if you could elaborate your point?
>>127663271
i started with a '90s one and it just wasn't that good. but i went to one from the '60s and it was much better so i guess it's not generally true.
>>127662419 (OP)
the point of his programs was giving a broad coverage of different styles. maybe you didn't enjoy everything but it was made in an uncompromised way in regard to advertisement or astroturfing/nepotism/wanting to congraciate with opop(timism) >>127663437
i find it very enchanting
>>127663468 >nonce
nah. he got the consent from the parents of the 15 year old girl which is totally legal. he received young girls but didn't have any way to verify their ages, it was usual back in the 60's in music business. >seethed about the clash after they bullied him for their peel session
he didn't seethe. also the clash were always quite shit so it means shit
>>127663468 >>127664784 >be me, checking out old 70s gig posters >oh look, there's John Peel and his amazing sounds of the 70s roadshow >and most attractive schoolgirl competition >>oh
