Thread 127808757

>trying to download an album
>have to scroll through 500 flac rips to find one in mp3
I hate placebo'd flac retards so much

>>127808757 (OP)
>Try to get album in 320kbps
>Only 192kbps pops up
>Finally find one in a good quality
>Download doesn't start
Can't believe soulseek still doesn't have an option to filter file type and kbps

>>127808776
You can filter by file type. Just use the filter bar thing at the bottom of the search list.

>>127808757 (OP)
>doesnt know how to use the the search filter
>its the other users fault
skill issue
put mbr:320 in your search you fuckin noob

>>127808776
it does, open your eyes

>>127808889
suck my fucking dick

>>127808922
you should be sucking my dick for raising your IQ by 1.

>>127808944
no way, you suck my dick. now

>>127808964
I'd have to teach on how to pull your zipper down, there isnt a help section.

>>127808979
just suck my dick man, please

what the fuck thread is this

>download flac
>decode to 320 kbps mp3

>>127809344
ain't nobody got time for that!

>smartest mp3 boomer can't filter by file extension
>smartest mp3 boomer won't download opus or convert flac to opus

Just padlocked all my files

this is me but with opus audio at 128kbps
also just use Nicotine + to filter codecs

>>127808757 (OP)
It wastes so much disk space

>>127808757 (OP)
>click on attributes
>drag it down to where you see 320kbps
It takes about 2 seconds.

>>127808757 (OP)
You torrented it from what.cd?

>try to remember the last time I had so little storage I had to consider file size
>can't

holy trinity

Hearing the difference now isn't the reason to encode to FLAC. FLAC uses lossless compression, while MP3 is 'lossy'. What this means is that for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA - it's about 15kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. You don't want to know how much worse it is on CD-ROM or other optical media. I started collecting MP3s in about 2001, and if I try to play any of the tracks I downloaded back then, even the stuff I grabbed at 320kbps, they just sound like crap. The bass is terrible, the midrange...well don't get me started. Some of those albums have degraded down to 32 or even 16kbps. FLAC rips from the same period still sound great, even if they weren't stored correctly, in a cool, dry place. Seriously, stick to FLAC, you may not be able to hear the difference now, but in a year or two, you'll be glad you did.

>>127811389
remove the bit about storing in a "cool, dry place", it's not funny and it makes it too unbelievable

>>127810728
>t. has only 10 albums in his library

>>127811520
it is an old pasta you newfag

>>127811571
never too late to improve something

>>127808757 (OP)
>saves everything in FLAC
>still listen everything from youtube
why I am like this?

>>127811576
autismus. I used to have about 30k music collection, mostly ambient and electronica. Think deleted all of it after collecting it for like 6 or 7 years. No point when there is spotify, and I used to hate FLAC too, no difference from 320, but many of my albums were rare and only 192kbps at best.

Now I just type whatever I want to listen or let spotify AI surprise me, much better than listening to same music over and over again. There is a lot of hidden modern gems and I like how music improved for amateurs at least. Rock/Metal and other popular genrese suck now so I would rather listen to oldies.

>>127809972
Like your benis?