>>128074995
>Well what is it?
I'm happy to tell you in my next post, but are you actually saying you don't even know the arguments that people have been making, or are you being willfully ignorant here?
>Why hasn't any one of the thousands of viewers or hate watchers noticed or pointed this out before they started going with this narrative
do you know they haven't? I'm not saying yes or no either way, but the idea that you or I haven't seen people say anything about it doesn't mean there haven't been people to notice - just perhaps that the evidence was too light or the context was so contained nothing came further. also she's a relatively young dog, and he simply could've started using the shock collar relatively recently and on that particular livestream ramped up the voltage and/or that time it happened to catch her off-guard and, as a result, she yelped.