Thread 128316821

Does /mu/ prefer the Beatles or the Rolling Stones?
Pic unrelated.

neither, both pleb garbage

>>128316821 (OP)
It depends. The Beatles for the songs. The Rolling Stones for the albums, especially the US first pressing on vinyl of Sticky Fingers.

>>128316821 (OP)
Rolling

>>128316821 (OP)
>does /mu/ prefer chocolate or a stinky piece of nigger shit

>>128316830
75iq take

>>128316846
The Rolling Stones is pure white music.

>>128316858
15 iq reply

>>128316864
Unlike Rolling Stones, Japanese loved Led Zeppellin.

>>128316887
And this is relevant because...?

>>128316883
Yes, retards will often just mime or imitate things because they don't have the mental capacity to formulate any other kind of response.

>>128316864
That's the Ramones actually

>>128316821 (OP)
Stones destroy Beatle ass every day, all day.

>>128316864
Ultra cope.

>>128316947
But Stones never gave us Revolution 9.

>>128316821 (OP)
I have listened to The Stones best songs way more times than The Beatles best songs. However I have listened to The Beatles best albums all the way through way more often than the best Stones albums.
The Beatles win however going off the fact that they knew to shut it down goy just in time. The Stones kept going and went from trend setters of the 60s to ripoff artists of the 70s, to I don't even wanna know what was up in the 80s and Mick Jagger's solo slop is an embarrassment even compared to what George Harrison was doing.

>>128316832
>beatles fan
makes some of the best most intresting manga art and storys ever
>beatles hater
makes boring anime that make people go
>le statement
I mean not to mention manga mogs any anime

>>128316821 (OP)

Stones by a moonlight mile

https://youtu.be/63HCDSZklJ4

>>128316832
Only manchildren watch anime

>>128316821 (OP)
They aren't even in the same league, John and Paul wrote Stones first ever hit and Stones copied Beatles until Beatles' breakup. This comparison is retarded.

>>128317402
THIS
The Beatles is at least two steps above RS.

beatles but neither really cus i was born after 1990

Rolling Stones mog the Beatles so hard it isn't even funny

>>128316821 (OP)
None

>>128316821 (OP)
Britpop sucks

>>128317459
name 1 good stones song

The Beatles, are we serious? Rolling Stones have some good songs like Paint it Black but the Beatles are peak kino patrician this is not a contest

>>128317434
>>128317459
>>128317623
>>128317339
I fucking hate The Beatles.

The beatles have two excellent albums the rolling stones have one very good album and one mediocre album

>>128317634
>a mystical journey with exquisite pop rock perfection
vs
>a glorified shitty bar band

>>128316832
>>128317634
KEK another hard to swallow pill by based Hayao

>>128316832
>>128317634
can we all agree ghibli movies are overrated?
they are for children

>>128318668
they really aren't other than Totoro

>>128318689
>teaching kids to protect the forest and the animals
>teaching kids war is le bad

>>128318706
all of his movies have some hippy message but that doesn't mean it's for kids. I remember watching Spirited Away when I was 10ish and I didn't understand anything and was just scared and confused, I only "got it" later when I watched it again in my 20s.

>>128318668
They're not really overrated. Look at MAL. For some reason these movies make animetroons extremely insecure.

>>128316821 (OP)
John and Paul basically taught the Stones how to write good/hit songs. What a stupid question.