>>128355446
Actually you are missing the point that it’s anthropomorphising God. Whether it’s literal or figurative it’s still wrong because it goes against the definition of God, as I already stated and you presumably don’t understand. It works if you say “what if a god (as in an idol) was a stranger on a bus” in which case it’s a kind of pagan song, but it’s clearly not trying to say that. It’s a stupid subversive anti-monotheist song and it’s like saying “what if the number 1 was actually not a single indivisible unit?”
Well, it wouldn’t be 1 then it’d be something else