>>128413457
fiction books. so she read all that and learned nothing. go read the 7 harry potter books and come back and tell me what you learned.
>>128413462
>just someone likes reading fiction books doesn't mean they're incapable of understanding non-fiction
i never said that, go back and properly read what i said. i said reading fiction is not proof of intelligence, in response to some anon claiming lily is some kind of intellectual because she reads her fiction books.
>you have no evidence she's dumb
i never actually said that either, i said her reading fiction books is not proof that she's intelligent. learn the difference and learn to properly comprehend what i wrote.
>you have no evidence she's smart
which was my whole point from the beginning. people shouldn't assume she is some intellectual just because she reads fiction.
if you're not going to properly read what i wrote before responding then maybe you are the one who is below average intelligence. otherwise you just sound like some celebrity worshipper who can't handle your delusions being shaken by reality.
