Thread 1432097

News article: https://archive.today/20250905001303/https://www.axios.com/2025/09/04/epstein-files-ghislaine-maxwell-doj-chief

>The Department of Justice's acting deputy chief was caught on a hidden camera saying that the government will "redact every Republican" from an Epstein client list.

>Why it matters: The O'Keefe Media Group, a far-right media organization, secretly recorded acting deputy Joseph Schnitt's comments and published them on Wednesday, in a move that represents just how large a rift the Epstein case has created between President Trump's administration and his MAGA base.

>"They'll redact every Republican or conservative person in those files, leave all the liberal, Democratic people," he told the reporter, who was undercover during the encounter, according to the video.
>In the video, he also called Attorney General Pam Bondi "a yes person," adding that she "wants whatever Trump wants."
Direct link to video of undercover reporter: https://x.com/jamesokeefeiii/status/1963617871281438731

>>1432097 (OP)
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/9/2/2191235/-Republican-Sexual-Predators-Abusers-and-Enablers-Pt-45
https://epsteinsblackbook.com/all-names
https://epsteinsblackbook.com/black-book-images/80.jpg
What goes on the internet stays on the internet

Good. They should only release the Democrats

The entire GOP are in the files, aren't they

>>1432097 (OP)
>jamesokeefe
Ahh so it's fake. I don't know why anyone trusts that guy anymore.

The only name on the list that matters is Prince Andrew.

>every Republican redacted
>>1432110
>Good
So the fact they've been redacted proves they're all pedos, so thanks for admitting you're a pedo supporter, >>1432110

>>1432113
I don't think all of them are in there.

>>1432127
You're telling me that they are so in line as a party that they're willing to not cut off the pedophiles in their party? Not even for the power grab? There's no power hungry fuckers in this party besides Mitch? That's unbelievable.

Honestly, what the fuck can they be so s cared of with the potential chance to put Trump on a leash is RIGHT THERE and they won't go for it?

>>1432131
>Honestly, what the fuck can they be so s cared of with the potential chance to put Trump on a leash is RIGHT THERE and they won't go for it?
They had tons of chances to be rid of Trump. Why turn on him now?

>>1432097 (OP)
I have so many questions after watching that full 8 minute video. No objections here this administration is utter garbage and led by a scumbag.

Probably my biggest question, after looking up this guy's job role in responsibilities, Is if he's even actually involved in any of this or if this is a cut up video of him just speculating. Mainly because, she asked "so will this he released?" And the guy says "I don't know but if it does it will be heavily redacted and they will remove him from it" leading me to believe this dude was speculating about someone else or some other arm of the doj, which would be classic okeefe misrepresentation

>>1432137
Because he's genuinely off his fucking rocker at this point. What the fuck is the point of the country by forcibly shrinking the middle class? You think Republicans will be safe once they tell the literal population of this country its slave labor or nothing? They'll be tarred and feathered. And for what? For the "God King" with the obvious puppet strings? Shit's not worth the runway.

>>1432139
He's surrounded himself with Yes-men. The people in the GOP who would've used Trump as a puppet and cut him off once he started going too far aren't in power anymore; instead, they've been replaced by hordes of retards who genuinely, honest to god believe that Trump is an infallible genius who they should basically worship. Which is even more dangerous, because that means no one can tell him to stop until the country is smoldering.

>>1432131
>You're telling me that they are so in line as a party that they're willing to not cut off the pedophiles in their party? Not even for the power grab? There's no power hungry fuckers in this party besides Mitch? That's unbelievable.
There's 3 republican representatives that kinda have gone against Trump in regards to the epstein victims and the list. Massie, MTG, and boebert.

>Honestly, what the fuck can they be so s cared of with the potential chance to put Trump on a leash is RIGHT THERE and they won't go for it?
There could be other dirt on them, it doesn't have to be that they are specifically in the epstein files. They also could be worried that one of his crazy followers might kill them.

>>1432110
GOPedos strike again. Can you quit fucking kids?

>>1432139
>Trump is batshit and losing it
That doesn’t matter to the Trumpers. They still see him as a god. They pray to him, I’ve seen “If only comrade Stalin knew!” posts about tariffs and ice raids. There’s no getting out of that level of delusion.

>>1432097 (OP)
Oh hey, faggot op, why did you leave out the second sentence of the first paragraph?
>The acting deputy chief of a Justice Department unit said on hidden camera that the government will "redact every Republican" from an Epstein client list. He later admitted he was basing his comments on media reports.

So op intentionally omitted literally half of the sentences in the opening paragraph
>He later admitted he was basing his comments on media reports.
>He later admitted he was basing his comments on media reports.
>He later admitted he was basing his comments on media reports.
>He later admitted he was basing his comments on media reports.
So it's literally pure speculation from someone uninvolved in the process.

>>1432110
why protect any pedophiles, anon? Is it only okay when your guys fuck children? You get off on it, don't you? You like knowing kids get assaulted by creepy fuckers like you?

die in a fucking fire.

>>1432146
but sir copington, you're ignoring
>In a statement addressed to the DOJ's acting director, Schnitt said that he had no idea he was being recorded and that he met the O'Keefe reporter — who he said was pretending to be an au pair — on Hinge.
'admitting' that he was basing his comments off of media reports and not insider knowledge is generous when he got caught spilling the beans and had to explain himself to his boss, i.e. trump
why would he put the coverup into official reports?

>no evidence
https://epsteinsblackbook.com/all-names
https://epsteinsblackbook.com/black-book-images/80.jpg
Yes evidence

>>1432146
That was added to the article later, after I posted this.

>>1432152
>>1432152
Yeah. This wasn't some random intern, this was a guy who had been in the DOJ for 23 years and he was very high up. He absolutely would have awareness of going

He's absolutely trying to cover his ass.

>>1432152
>O'Keefe reporter
Okeefe's paid actor shills are not reporters.

I love it, I really enjoy the fact that for years, 4chan has been overanalyzing every little crumb that could suggest a grand satanic pedophile conspiracy, listening to some random guy pretending to be a messiah, without any evidence. And now that their guru is in deep shit, they're telling us we don't have enough evidence. Trump has been quoted 1,000 times by people who know he's in the files? Not evidence. A video that skips right at the important moment? Not evidence. The White House saying that asking for the files is an act of war? Not evidence. Epstein's survivors saying that Trump was there the whole time? Not proof. An official saying that Maxwell is protecting Trump in exchange for preferential treatment? Not proof.

Honestly, at this point, Trump could post a photo of himself naked next to an 11-year-old girl and you'd say, “Oh, but he's not touching her sexually in the photo! No proof!”

>>1432159
>Ashley Biden implicated her father in her diary
>Hunter banged prostitutes of questionable age and took pictures
>/pol/ had to be purged because a lot of the shit they extracted from his iCloud account was pizza and had to do with human trafficking
The worst part isn't the hypocrisy. It's that most of you retards don't even know what the Esptein files are really about.

>>1432160
Dude I don't know why you're talking about Biden like I was defending him. If he's in the file get his ass. Get his son's. Get everyone involved. I don't care if thay're republican or democrats.

The worst part IS the hypocrisy. You've been acting like fucking white knights for 10 years, and now you're just a bunch of whiny, scared little bitches. Pathetic.

>>1432160
You people are too gullible to live.

>>1432160
>Yeah I know Trump was friends with Epstein for years, he died under the watch of his justice department, and he's been acting suspect as all hell about actually releasing the files like he repeatedly promised to do
>B-but what about the two separate times someone stole something from one of Biden's kids and went through enough fucked up changes of custody that conveniently ended in republican political operatives hands that no court on earth would accept them as evidence?

>>1432161
Kinda hard to get everyone involved when they were pardoned.

>>1432163
>B-but what about the two separate times someone stole something from one of Biden's kids and went through enough fucked up changes of custody that conveniently ended in republican political operatives hands that no court on earth would accept them as evidence?
>still can't explain why Ashley Biden hasn't come out to refute the evidence as fake
Y'know if someone from the media put out a fake diary claiming it to be mine and included a part where my father took showers with me that I didn't like, that again didn't happen, I'd at least file a defamation of character lawsuit.

>>1432167
Trump is a pedophile and you're a shill faggot with an obvious agenda

>>1432168
Are you the faggot op who omitted half of the opening paragraph to the article? The opening half which stated that this guy has nothing to do with the investigation and was repeating what he heard on msnbc?

>>1432170
are you a shill who defends trump's pedophilia? yes or no

>>1432178
I don't defend your delusions, no

>>1432198
you're not a very good actor

>>1432198
It's funny how until now, you were all Sherlock Holmes, hunting down every little clue to fuel your delusions, but now that we have evidence as big as a black woman's ass right in front of our eyes, you're acting like the three monkeys: “I see nothing, I hear nothing, I say nothing.”

If Trump's name isn't on the list, there's no reason for him to not release it. If the Republicans are truly the 'Party of Law and Order' that always self-declare to be morally superior to everyone else - thus they have never done anything wrong - they have nothing to fear from the list being released unredacted. And Trump/GOP's glazers should be demanding the release of the list: it was a campaign policy for Trump last year, and MAGAts supported that.
So why are all concerned so against the list being released completely unredacted? I say release it unredacted: and any Democrats on that list, throw them to the wolves. If your party & leader is as pure as you claim they are, MAGAts, you have no excuses for not wanting it released completely unredacted and so what if the GOP were completely erased from existence if they are on that list? So what if the Republicans & Trump were politically destroyed? I don't see any problem with that happening, so what's your excuse?

>>1432161
>Dude I don't know why you're talking about Biden like I was defending him.
You were defending him. Your party was defending him. The media, the intelligence agencies, silicon valley, teacher's unions and even foreign nations were defending him.

The Epstein files aren't just about Trump. They implicate our entire leadership class as being held hostage by a foreign power. We're technically not a democracy because our will, as voters, is stepped over in favor of that foreign power. You genuinely don't know what the fuck you're asking for by demanding these files be released.

>>1432204
you're retarded, and i'm about to tell you why

it's because

>>1432204
The excuse is that we live in a society that can't admit their sunk cost fallacy isn't worth the pain its bringing to own the libs. Until we get past this idiotic phase and people realize you can be conservative without shooting your fucking knee caps off, then the GOP can get away with anything.

>>1432210
We’re waiting…

>>1432209
>Your party was defending him
What Party? I'm not a dem you fucker, I'm a fucking libertarian. You have so little morality, so few scruples in defending Trump, even though there are huge suspicions that he is involved in a pedophile scandal, that you end up saying anything to defend him.

Fuck, I'm glad I'm not voting if that's what it entails: boundless loyalty to a leader no matter what he does. You have no morals, no values, no dignity. Only political interests and power games. You disgust me, all of you, Democrats and Republicans alike.

>>1432219
>You disgust me, all of you, Democrats and Republicans alike.
Oh no, another embarrassed Republican pretending they're not a retard by calling themselves a libertarian is saying both sides are bad.

>>1432219
>I'm not a dem you fucker, I'm a fucking libertarian.
I don't believe you, retard, because we went through four years of censorship under the Biden regime and you're over here taking potshots at Trump.

Trump is closer to your wheelhouse than anybody else.

>>1432226
Why would I do that? If I was a rep, I'll be the first to demand for my “leader”accountability. Exactly: I would have voted for him, he OWES me something, he OWES me the truth, the honesty. If he has power, it's thanks to ME. And this scumbag is taking advantage of it to try to sweep under the rug the fact that he slept with minors? Shitty bastard.

>>1432227
>I don't believe you
I don't fucking care about what you belive or not.

>Trump is closer to your wheelhouse
That was BEFORE I knew he fucked kids. That's a limit I draw. And I'm the one you're attacking? And you're defending the pedophile? Don't you feel a bit shitty, man?

>>1432219
>I'm a fucking libertarian
And when it comes to fucking, as far as libertarians are concerned it's 'Age is only a number'.
Not caring about laws - or you wouldn't be libertarians - morals, values & dignity are alien concepts to you. As if MAGAtards' morality - or lack of such - wasn't bad enough.
>>1432210
>it's because
...and your lack of a reason is why you're just a retard reduced to projecting. But you display in Cinemascope the reasons - because of your refusal to demand the release of the list unredacted - your support of the proven fact that, because the Gang Of Pedophiles want the list released: but only all the Republicans on that list redacted, they are all pedos. No Exceptions. Otherwise - if they aren't - they would release that list unredacted. No Excuses.
Only retards don't want that fully unredacted list released. And all retards such as you are proven pedos. No Exceptions.

According to House Speaker Johnson, Trump was an FBI informant before running for office and gave them info on Epstein.

FBI informant ... FDB agent Krasnov ... President ... is there anything this man cannot do?

>>1432228
>That was BEFORE I knew he fucked kids. That's a limit I draw.
>Cried the transexual sex

esl shill loves bringing up his fetish for no reason, and also proving to everyone that he is in fact esl

>>1432242
Bot, how many raped happen daily in India?

>>1432230
Take your meds, Ranjeet

>>1432246
>>1432247
>how many raped happen
esl shill, how do you keep exposing yourself like this? it's pathetic

>>1432247
There's isn't enough cow manure in all of India to cure his mental dysfunctions

>>1432249
we all know you're talking to yourself you moronic faggot. it's amazing people as dumb as you aren't weeded out naturally

>>1432248
You are Indian

i would seriously end it all if i were in esl shills shoes

>>1432251
>>1432253
Go eat more cow poop until you feel better

>>1432253
>shills shoes
You forgot the apostrophe, Ranjeet. It should be "shill's shoes". Thank you for proving that you're an ESL third world street shitter.

>>1432247
>>1432249
>>1432252
>>1432254
>>1432257
>projecting this much
Get a room in that multiplex Bollywood cinema you work at in Calcutta, you lot

>>1432235
I can't wait for MAGA to try and say Trump was actually part of an elite commando mission to rescue the poor orphan sex slaves from Epstein's island. AI generate a picture of him peeking out of the water with combat knife in his teeth and an American flag tattooed across his face.

The clanker is hallucinating again

The shill is a clanker

>>1432170
>Are you the faggot op who omitted half of the opening paragraph to the article? The opening half which stated that this guy has nothing to do with the investigation and was repeating what he heard on msnbc?
I'm not the anon you are responding to.
That wasn't there when I posted this thread.
The article was edited and it was added AFTER i posted this thread.

Compare the 2 versions of the article:
https://archive.ph/20250905001303/https://www.axios.com/2025/09/04/epstein-files-ghislaine-maxwell-doj-chief

https://archive.ph/20250905120639/https://www.axios.com/2025/09/04/epstein-files-ghislaine-maxwell-doj-chief

“She claimed to be an au pair in Georgetown. She gave no clues that she was a reporter or recording our date,” Schnitt said in the statement, which was posted on social media. “Had I a clue, the first date would have immediately ended and there would never have been a second one.”

Schnitt went on to say that his comments captured in the video were based on what he had “learned in the media and not from anything I’ve done at or via work.”

“I have no knowledge of the circumstances surrounding Ms. Maxwell other than what is reported in the news,” Schnitt said. “I also never divulged anything about what I do at work. I recall that she asked if I had any knowledge about Maxwell and I specifically said I only know what’s been reported in the media.”

>>1432278
Don't take it personally, /news/ always spergs out when they change the article. Axios used to be banned here for being so low quality until they started breaking more news stories.

>>1432110
if this isnt a troll post i hope you get disemboweled by a kitchen spoon
death to all pedos. regardless of party.

>>1432097 (OP)
I wish I could be surprised by this.

>>1432337
No, it's true. Axios is reporting on James okeefe reporting what some government employees said he heard on the news during a date
It's that bad

>>1432342
I wish I could be surprised by this cope too.
Realize that even if this is true and it’s all bullshit, it still wouldn’t be surprising at all for this administration to release the files with all their people removed and all their enemies highlighted. And that in itself is really bad.

>>1432344
>Realize that even if this is true
It's true. It's in the article if you actually read the one on axios' website.
Axios reported on James okeefe reporting on what a government worker said he heard reported on TV, while on a date with an undercover reporter.

Thats what the quality of this news is.

Can we please normalize that it's completely ok for citizens to beat the shit out pedophiles and government officials who coverup for pedophiles?

>>1432146
/thread

>>1432375
No, that's precisely why Jeffrey Epstein died and we have this whole problem.

Besides, Trump is not on the list.

>>1432377
>Trump is not on the list
So he shouldn't be afraid of ordering the release of that list. He made it a campaign policy last year. Oh, he and most of the GOP are on that list. Also:
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/9/2/2191235/-Republican-Sexual-Predators-Abusers-and-Enablers-Pt-45
https://epsteinsblackbook.com/all-names
https://epsteinsblackbook.com/black-book-images/80.jpg

>>1432380
no no no you don't understand, its 0d chess jenius strategy to declare the whole thing a hoax, get the fbi working 24/7 to redact you from the thing, and get your stooges to say crazy shit like he's secretly an fbi informant on the case and thats why he's in there

>>1432097 (OP)
So there are republicans on the list.

>>1432097 (OP)
good why not, better change your party affiliation asap ifyou don't wanna be outted. you sick pedos
>>1432143
why do you keep multilating kids then? age of consent means AGE OF CONSENT including for body disfiguration and hormone treatment.
>>1432149
Oh the hilarity of a democrat saying this sex pest
>>1432332
then you should go ahead and rope yourself.

>>1432589
>sex pest
>>1432589 had a girlfriend who went with a leftist - and she consented to sex with him, because unlike >>1432589, he wasn't a rightist asshole - and he's been impotently seething since. he certainly hasn't been with a girl since, thus has become the /r9k/-reject manbaby he is today, certainly resulting in he being impotent and is reduced to lashing out at others not exactly like him
>rope yourself
yep, he's a manbaby incel from /r9k/. saying those two words proves it

>>1432377
>Besides, Trump is not on the list.

Wrong:

> 'I'm already scared enough': Epstein survivor sidesteps direct question about Trump

https://www.rawstory.com/epstein-survivors-speak-scared/


>Jeffrey Epstein Kept an '8x10 Framed Picture' of Donald Trump on His Desk, Survivor Claims: Trump Was 'His Biggest Brag'

https://people.com/epstein-kept-framed-picture-trump-on-desk-survivor-claims-11802686

>Bondi briefed Trump that his name was in Epstein files

https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/23/politics/bondi-trump-epstein-list-files


>The FBI Redacted Trump’s Name in the Epstein Files

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-08-01/epstein-files-trump-s-name-was-redacted-by-the-fbi


>Trump Musk feud explodes with claim president is in Epstein files

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-disappointed-elon-musk-musk-strikes-back-real/story?id=122543215


>Time to drop the really big bomb:

>@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.

>Have a nice day, DJT!

https://archive.is/20250606223322/https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1930703865801810022