>cvt

>>28460973 (OP)
this is the most efficient transmission isn't it

But CVT is great on scooters. I can't drink/smoke and drive on any other motorcycle like I can a scooter.

>>28461135
Toroidal CVT is better

>>28461135
Efficienct because it breaks down and no more fuel burn right?

>>28463024
>breaks down
Only for non whites though, the cars last forever in white hands but there's camera sensors in the cluster that determine the drivers race and they program the car to shit itself prematurely.

T. Programmer

>>28463037
Yeah that's because we buy Honders and toyots. Buy a Niggsan and see your skin turn brown.

>>28463041
>>28463037
New Gen POC prefer Toyotas and Hondas rather than Nissans

>>28460973 (OP)
CVTs are honestly neat
Flawed, sure. But admirably simple and efficient

>cvts are le fragile and bad
*500,000 mile Prius blocks your path*

>>28464082
I honestly think they're based as shit when they're not fake shifting, holding the engine rpm for max power at whatever throttle position is extremely based for acceleration and economical cruising.

>>28461135
They are great at keeping the engine in the best available operating point, that's where fuel savings come from.
From a mechanical standpoint, a CVT typically has higher transmission losses than a manual (automating that or making a DCT doesn't change that), tendentially also higher than planetary-gear automatics though not by much.

>>28464082
>Flawed
Maybe in cars. But on small bikes where you can use a kevlar belt that are great, last a long time, and extremely easy to service.

>>28465224
Lol nerd

>>28465235
Farming tractors use CVTs and they're solid

>>28461135
If there is no resistance.

>>28460973 (OP)
>trannie
https://www.youtube.com/@transportevolved?si=QcxOPkYOrYKn7rJv