>>28462940 (OP)
Isn’t TCR limited to 2.0 L? If so there’s not way
MSRP on my ‘25 in ultimate red with DCT was like 37.7K, I paid 34.2K plus licensing and taxes (~38.3K OTD)
other dealers were quoting anywhere from 39.7K to 45K OTD, with the higher offers coming from dealers with no on the lot inventory
Never go to a dealership until you’ve already negotiated an OTD price with all your local dealers and have basically already made the deal
>>28463703 >eLSD >active dampers >active steering >active exhaust >0-60 in 4.8 seconds >under 40k out the door brand new with warranty
it's the best performance daily driver for under 40k and it's not even close
>>28463708
You wrote an entire paragraph about your shitbox and its just what electric nannies it has and the warranty. You are a massive flaming faggot
>>28463714 >buying a used american car that someone beat the shit out of during the break in period and immediately returned
kek no thanks >Mustang GT will smoke the fuck out of that ricebox
here's laguna seca lap times, and you can find youtube videos of the elantra n setting the track record for a FWD car and faster than the GT500 times
>>28463830
Kek. So, you're saying if I find a sub 10k miles Elantra N for sale that means the Elantra N is a piece of shit? I wouldn't go that route if I were you. Cope harder.
>>28463798
Outside anon here but the fact you can even put those three vehicles into a comparison speaks volumes about the Elantra.
When did /o hate choice and cheaper performance? Boss 302 and GT500 are better cars without a doubt, but they aren't exactly "in the same ballpark" cost wise, ownership wise. etc.
>>28463846
6 seconds on a track is a massive difference. They aren't actually comparable, that's the point. Additionally, on the street as a daily, raw power is king.
Also, driving a riced compact boyracer car with a buzzy engine when you're 33 isn't cool.
The GT500 is probably an 80k dollar car *if you are lucky and dont end up paying dealer markup fees*
The Elantra is 40k at worst - six second between them for double the cost is the argument.
On the street, raw power for a daily is literally not king, I mean it could be, but it depends if you want a track car as a daily. Most GT500 owners aren't taking their GT500 to walmart for groceries.
I think some people misalign a daily, vs a track weapon.
>>28463932 >six second between them
It's 13 seconds between them for the GT500. 6 seconds is for the Boss 302. The Boss is also a 2013. The 2025 Mustang GT is faster. >but it depends if you want a track car as a daily
A GT is not a "track car". And yet it has 480 HP. Our little elantra n has 276 hp.
>>28463937
Absolutely nobody gives a fuck about the record for "fastest FWD". It being FWD is also a negative. No power sliding, no burnouts, understeers.
>>28463932
If a mustang was solely about track speed for the money it would be a corvette, not a mustang. Same as the camaro and challenger and charger.
>>28463983
Saying the mustang would be other manufactures cars is the dumbest shit I've read in 60 days.
The mustang fits from ecoboost trash tier, to Darkhorse\GT Tier for Ford. Its designed to be a enterprise-rent-a-car solution, to grocery getter, to drop-top automatic slush box, to track weapon.
What autism max level are you playing at to say it would be a Corvette, or a Challenger or a fucking Apollo 9 rocket.
>>28463989
He's saying if were solely about the track, it'd be a 2 seater like the Corvette. That the Mustang, Camaro, Challenger and Charger are all intended to be used as practical dailies. As you could redesign them all to be 2 seaters and strip them down to make them better track cars while being priced the same or less.
The Ford GT, while highly priced, could have been reengineered to be Corvette priced and is what he's talking about. A Ford GT is not a practical daily. It's a track supercar.
>>28463408
Fat distributes much more beautifully on men than on women. I'll only support "body positivity" if it encourages fat men over fat women. Unfortunately it does just the opposite.
Fucking gooner gacha games making women fat, while no female oriented husbando game dares include a cute chubby male.
>>28465868 >Why is the key fob also fat?
This. She overpaid and has a bulky key.
For the low price of a USB cord, you can get your own hyundai. The USB cord is never that fucking huge.
>>28464923
Those are the glass tranny everyone says to avoid, right? MT82? For Tremec you need to spend more than the M2 base price and buy a Dark Horse. It's hard to justify that, I think you'd have to content yourself with the MT82 if you can.
>>28463962 >It being FWD is also a negative. No power sliding, no burnouts, understeers.
You've never driven a car and it's painfully obvious. Go back to your bus. All three of those are possible in FWD. Absolute fucking state of /o/ thinking you can't understeer in FWD
>>28476519
i just got one last month for 3k off msrp
some of you mfs just don't know how to buy cars
shouldn't even be walking into a dealership without having already negotiated your OTD price
>>28476515
You're ESL and not white. Understeering is a bad thing and was listed as such. Oversteering is fun, understeering is gay. And no, you can't powerslide or do burnouts in a FWD. You end up doing dumbass shit like pic related.
If car has handbrake the car was made to be driven fun.
If car uas foot brake it was made to be driven by grandma.
If car has electric ebrake it was made to be driven by stupid.