What's the best hypercar?

The one you could actually afford if you applied yourself.

We've gotta rule out the poorly made Valkyrie that's earning Aston more lemon lawsuits than goodwill, fire hazard McLaren, Pagani since they're just a financial instrument now. Ferrari make a good car but the mystique is dying now that they even got rid of push to start buttons and tie the start a capacitive touch sensor like some cheap microwave. Lamborghini doesn't have anything at the moment. That leaves Bugatti, a bunch of "buy our car because it's different" boutique outfits, and Koenigsegg. Bugatti has a strong argument, Koenigsegg has numbers. I'd personally want the Koenigsegg though. Not a gemera, would rather have a cc850

>>28467542 (OP)
A clean and running group B rally car like a Quattro or Lancia Delta.

>>28467542 (OP)
the one that holds the production car record, or this>>28467546 if you don't care about numbers.

>>28467542 (OP)

>>28467727
>Not t50

>>28467542 (OP)
Hypercars, like your Bugattis, Koeniggseggs, or Pagani whatevers, are the rich man’s equivalent of a sketchy offshore bank account, but with more carbon fiber and worse gas mileage. Why? ‘Cause they’re perfect for washing dirty cash. Limited production runs, insane price tags, and a market full of shady buyers make ‘em a dream for anyone looking to “clean” their drug cartel profits or crypto scam haul. You don’t even need to drive the damn thing—just park it in a Dubai garage and call it an “investment.”

Here’s the deal: hypercars are illiquid as hell. You can’t just stroll into a dealership with a suitcase of cash and walk out with a Rimac Nevera (unless you’re in some third-world dictator’s entourage, maybe). Manufacturers like Ferrari or McLaren vet buyers like they’re applying for CIA clearance. So, how does Dirty Dan with his narco bucks get one? He funnels his cash through shell companies, “art collectors,” or “consulting firms” to buy these things at auctions or through private sales. The car’s “value” is whatever some appraiser says, so you can inflate the price to justify moving millions. Sell it later to another sketchy oligarch, and boom—your money’s clean, and you’ve got a story about “passion for automotive art” to tell the feds.

>>28468000
And let’s talk about the “appreciation” meme. Shills will scream, “Hypercars are investments, bro! They go up in value!” Sure, some do, but only if you’re in the right circlejerk of billionaires willing to overpay. Look at the McLaren F1: yeah, it’s worth $20M now, but that’s ‘cause it’s a 90s icon with a cult following. Most modern hypercars? They depreciate like a Yugo unless you’re flipping ‘em to the next shady buyer in line. A 2018 study by Knight Frank’s Luxury Investment Index showed classic cars barely beat inflation over a decade, and hypercars are even riskier ‘cause they’re not “classics” yet. You’re banking on hype, not value. Meanwhile, your “investment” needs $50K a year in maintenance and a climate-controlled garage. Lmao, good luck.

The cherry on top? These cars are barely usable. A Koenigsegg Jesko can hit 300 mph, but where you driving that, anon? Your local Walmart parking lot? They’re fragile, impractical, and most owners never take ‘em outta first gear. It’s not about driving; it’s about owning a shiny object to move dirty money or dodge sanctions. Look at the Russian oligarchs who got their Ferraris and Lambos seized in Europe after Ukraine sanctions hit. Those cars weren’t for Sunday cruises—they were financial escape pods.

>>28467542 (OP)
>What's the best hypercar?

I'd say the Veyron. Obviously there are several faster cars now as well as the Chiron which is a faster more practical Veyron; but the Veyron was the last car that really shocked the world with how fast and powerful it is.

the gm corvette tm

>>28467542 (OP)
They're all shitty. They're the equivalent of a celebrity woman or a supermodel. They're super high maintenance, too flashy, unreliable and their performance is generally pretty lackluster. You will also never see one let alone touch one and you definitely won't ever own one. Just like the 9 and 10/10 women walking around in the real world you could build a car that outperforms the hypercar and likely wind up with a much better driving experience.

>>28468104
>you could build a car that outperforms the hypercar and likely wind up with a much better driving experience.
I get where you're coming from but I feel something like a Veyron or a Chiron would have a wonderful driving experience, at cruising speeds it's more of an ultra luxury car

>>28468061

This is the practical answer. Its the only one you could own while being rich; but not stupidly rich.

>>28468113
The Veyron/Chiron isn't going to drive or ride anything like an A8/S-Class/Rolls/etc. Their interiors aren't that nice. It would only be a slight upgrade over something like a twin turbo Viper with good suspension. Yes not as good but is being that little bit better worth the extra couple million dollars for less performance?

>>28468122
You have to remember that most of these cars just end up in Arab hands and they have zero taste. They see an expensive thing and immediately pay retarded amounts of money for it to say they have one.