Why can't they stop exploding?

>>28470294 (OP)
This will be the 9th time ICE drones have made this thread

>>28470295
Why does it keep happening?

who cares zzz

>>28470294 (OP)
Because electric cars literally are extremely explosive vehicles. When lithium gets to contact with humidity it will naturally explode. Also if any of the lithium battery cells gets damaged or shortcut it can also cause explosion. Theres good reason why many lithium battery powered stuff come with this warning label on the package.

>>28470294 (OP)
I'm so glad that gas vehicles never go up in flames!

>>28472617
Cope tranny

>>28470294 (OP)
How many shitslas were on that boat?

>>28470294 (OP)
Immature technology and construction process
Wait until the 2nd gen solid state batteries

>>28473643
>Immature technology
Battery cars have been around for as long as gas powered ones.

>>28473657
So? High voltage batteries are delicate compared with gas tanks

>>28473657
post an EV from the 70s then

>>28474161
Wasn't the cheese wedge from the 70s

>>28474161
I can do 90s

>>28474202
Cheese Louise. Robert Dunn has one too.

>>28473657
I find the joke to be that something so icon becomes so much as a relic, its occasionally drawn with exhaust clouds
I don't even

>>28474313
cars kick up dust anon, that's not exhaust smoke

>>28470294 (OP)
China's insanely illegal low standards and cost cutting measures of corrupt corporate ccp associated rats.

>>28474320
This isn't a wild selection of Italian comics anon.
That is a narrow selection of Italian comics.

>>28474324
We know it wasn't Chingchong Dingdong Motors because those are banned from sale in the US.
It was all Shitslas, Kekvians, MuhFatPolestars, along with "luxury" hybrids.

>>28476079
Did you know that Canada and Mexico also exist?

>>28470295
We have become exceedingly good at it

>>28474202
>>28474306
>Cute.
Cute!

>>28470294 (OP)
It sank.
https://apnews.com/article/car-carrier-sinks-aleutian-islands-5eec64f6bad760cf3ebbb4c810f78b68

>>28477878
Is it still burning under water?

>>28477891
Probably not, it's in 5000 meters of water, there is a lot of cooling potential in the literal cubic kilometers of water surrounding the lithium batteries. They are probably still corroding exothermically, but it's probably not technically a fire any longer.

>>28473657
Are you like actually retarded? I'll be nicer if you are. Just because they've been around a long time doesn't mean the technology is mature, there's been orders of magnitude more development in ICE cars than EV, and lithium batteries are still somewhat new, they're absolutely less mature.

>>28477891
Most of them are not self propelled when punctured, but some of them could be.

I'd image that is why a lot of the Chinese battery OEM is moving ttowards safer chemistry, not for the clout, but because there is some rather large supply chain costs when your 0.1% yield rate makes it into the finished product of a vendor.
>is it really safer
Its still 50-70KWh per car, that is still some ~45-60kg of TNT per car that shorts, even if the car fizzles like a spark shower and the TNT goes boom. But not shorting on puncture is a major benefit, similar to how a lot of cars is going to have reinforced gas tanks if the car fails the initial safety tests