Isn’t it weird that so called enthusiasts opt for some weird FWD cuckboxes and even non-M BMWs instead of picrel?
And then they say hilarious things like
>you can’t even feel it’s weight

>fr*nch
>auto only
Rental.

>>28470401
bread on hood

>>28470401
Lmao exactly what I was thinking when I opened this thread

>>28470400 (OP)
While I appreciate the A110, as a little daily i'd consider it. However there's one problem. I'm from the UK and Lotus exists. Why would I spend 30-35k on one of these when I can pick up a series 3 elise for 10k less. And if I was going to spend 35k on a car like this. You can generally start picking up V6 Exiges for 35-37k. Which is where the problem for the Alpine lays for me.

>>28470400 (OP)
Bones status?

>>28470543
All four corners, and a good enough setup that Gordon Murray used it as the benchmark for his T.50 at that. The chassis isn't the problem.

>>28470539
>elise
>exige
that car is not even in the same realm as the a110. it's a stripped out uncomfortable track day car. it's really cool too, but let's not pretend it's anything close.
Evora and Emira are closer rivals, but even those aren't as easy to live with as the Alpine.

>>28470400 (OP)
>brand set to become 100% EV with a range of EV cuckovers and an electric A110
Not a company with a future, and not a company worth supporting, sorry. This thing gets raped by an Alfa Romeo 4C anyway.

>>28470599
Muh stripped out car. Driven an Elise, it was spartan in luxuries but the seat and suspension was comfy. You can daily an Elise no problem. Mate of mine at work does (same one I drove). The nearest thing the Alpine tries to be and draws comparison to is the Elise considering engine sizes too. However while the Exige is more hardcore, for that cost I'd buy an Exige V6s. However if you want to draw the Evora in, sure. There's a 2010 manual example with 55k miles for 25K. 10k less than the A110. So again, my point stands. Why in the UK would I buy the Alpine, when I can buy a Lotus. Albeit, Elise, Exige or Evora for either cheaper, or a better one at a comparable price. I don't know why you think they are harder to live with than the Alpine. In other countries, maybe, but here where we have maximum Lotus support, why would I get the Alpine?

>>28470602
>4C
the A110 is a reliable car.
the 4C is, how do I put this, a piece of shit.

>muh EV future
they will do whatever it takes to stay in business. EVs don’t sell and they will go back to ICEs, just like the other brands

>>28470589
The problem is the look of the front fascia

>>28470674
It's a very good looking, tramlining piece of shit thank you! Again another car I couldn't justify in bongland vs Lotus. Unless I wanted only the looks.

>>28470720
>Lotus
Lots
Of
Trouble
Usually
Serious

>>28470401
I’m still waiting >>28470402

>>28470741
He's still trying but the bread keeps falling off

>>28470739
Lmao, between shitalians, renaults and Japanese engines and drive trains... Lotus is probably the most reliable in this window licking contest.

>>28470838
LOL

>>28470400 (OP)
Alpine died with Jean Rédélé.

there’s not a single reason to get an A110 when the cayman exists

>>28471285
Maccas on all 4 thoughbeit

>>28471285
The A110 is noticeably lighter and has a significantly more compliant ride. It's the better choice if you live somewhere with particularly bumpy roads.

>>28470683
yea needs more fake vents and wings, maybe some angry eyebrows huh you little tranny

>>28471044
>Chatgpt

Why won’t alpine or lotus compete in the 24h of burgerking?
I’ll answer my own question: because their cars won’t make it to the finish line anyway lol

>>28470401
>fr*nch
this is a good thing actually
>auto only
massive shame

I just drove the A110S with some aero in my sim.
Goddamn what a menace

>>28470400 (OP)
pretty little german fucktoy

>the look on her face
you just know she’s addicted to the 12%

>>28471375
No it just needs to not look like a stupid ugly pikachu catfish
>>28472982
Yeah it's fuckin UGLY isn't it?!

>>28472989

>>28472996
the front isn’t particularly pretty but the rear makes up for it.
so does the handling and power delivery for just 300hp

>>28473025
Delusional

>>28473031
uh oh stinky.
almost 200hp less yet superior kek

hey op
post your A110
oh wait....

yet another benchracer larp thread.....

anyway I raced an e36 coupe last night, it was significantly slower, I wonder if it was actually a 2.5 or a 2.8, they are about 20hp less than me, 10-13 years older than my 400k km engine, and I am like 200kg heavier, so I am pretty sure it was a 2 liter, or it was really clapped out lmfao
oh and it was lowered like shit so it had to slow down a lot on speedbumps lmfao

>>28473042
What the fuck is an uh oh stinky?
The m2 is a fuckin made in mexico narb LOL the a110 is UGLY as FUCK
Stock cars that aren't the perfect-out-of-the-box STRAIGHT 6 E39s or Sacco era Benzes are for ricelet "wrenchlets" in the parlance of our times
And who cares about track times of tracks that you'll literally never drive? Who tracks a stock car in the first place LOL

>>28473128
here you go chud

>>28473148
bread on hood twink

>>28473128
>oh and it was lowered like shit so it had to slow down a lot on speedbumps lmfao
"Based" and good-coiloverpilled, to use the parlance of our times

>>28470400 (OP)
the older one is better and is my favorite car

>>28473162

>>28473162
I love this one too but the modern one is not bad in the slightest. compared to most other modern takes from the likes of BMW etc. it’s actually phenomenal

>>28473170
The new one looks like a pikachu lizard catfish pokeman

>>28473175
it’s not a beauty, but it’s light, small and fast. something that’s unique in today’s pigfat world

>>28473175
It’s not that bad.

>>28473185
It isn't that bad i just hate the nostril lights and the shape of the hood looks weak, which seems to be the case for a lot of MR cars

>>28473025
Looks like a vw

>>28473217
it’s the other way around.
the A110 is a classic that got copied by Audi

>>28473220
I just dislike the shape of both for the same reason. Why can't they just make them look "cool?" You know, "cool?" Like a black guy

>>28473148
wasn’t the A110 designed by a 6‘7 guy or something?
unless the guy in that pic is 6‘7 too, there’s no way a tall person fits in there

>>28473163
that thing is W I D E. i love it

A110 is cool but it is absurdly expensive for what you get here

>>28474326
Yep. A very rare, some even say the only, case of a Win by the frogs

>>28474336
i still have a poster of this thing in my room. I actually discovered the Alpine as kid because of an anime called evangelion and one of the waifus had an alpine A310

>>28474335
Yuropoor here.
These things deprecate like crazy. An 1 year old A110S with like 10k km on the clock goes for 50-55k.
that’s not cheap but it’s a true driver’s car with low production volume.
If you happen to have money, it’s a great choice if you can live with flappy paddles instead of a stick

>>28474348
>Numerous A110 reviews in local auto media
>Numerous new French shitboxes on the road
>A110 not officially sold in NZ
Fucking why, honestly? I would buy one over a Cayman any day.

>>28474356
It’s over 300kg(660+ lbs) lighter than a cayman with PDK, and WAY more unique.
I’d go for the A110S too

If I were a boomer with money id get a pimped up ravage a110