>>28481096Let's start with the price tag. Why do I not like things with a high price tag? Because in current year it is completely decoupled with value. Price tag especially within the car world is simply a signifier of luxury past a certain point. There aren't $200/$300/$400k worth of parts inside of it. So yes I see price tag as something entirely fake thought up by busy bureaucrats with only KPI's and margins in mind. Fundamentally, I already don't "trust" it.
The second and most important thing for me is that it is not designed by a human. Because we do not have smooth and globally defined solutions for the navier-stokes equations, we make up for that gap by throwing computational power at it, meaning we can only incrementally improve aerodynamics in a bayesian way.
Ever since we've been able to run millions of windtunnel and aerodynamic simulations in the 80's/90's, cars designs have started to converge heavily. There are only so many ways to skin a cat, or in this case, design a door panel for greater MPG. It's why every single door card since the 90's/2000's looks the same with only slight variations. Every SUV looks like every other SUV. Every sports car looks like every other sports car.
My point is, when I look at old cars, I know I'm looking at a story. That there was some guy somewhere obsessed with the car and designed every curve carefully. You just didn't have the technology, it was all human oriented, tested and designed by people spending countless hours at the track taping bits of yarn all over it. It had soul. It's why old cars are so wildly different to each other.