>>28497150>So in other words it’s in the obvious place to put it?Yeah sure, if your goal is to waste land then go for it. If your goal is to actually service the people of LA or San Jose/San Francisco then no lmao. Nobody in their right mind is driving over an hour to charge just to then lose 20-30%+ of that charge on the way home.
>nothingest of nothing burgers>>28497154>OH NOES WHAT WILL WE DO IN THE 3000 SQ MILE OF EMPTY LANDIt shows that this is impractical and NOT THE FUTURE OF SUPERCHARGERS. YOU CAN NOT PLACE THESE NEAR ACTUAL POPULATION CENTERS. Maybe Elon should actually help California fix their energy Grid and make compact charger stations if he wants to actually help people and not waste land, but of course that's not helping his wallet so he's not going to do that. God forbid he helps fund a Nuclear Powerplant that would power all of the chargers on the entire west coast at a fraction of the land used, that would be way too logical!
I'm glad the BBB is now taxing solar and fucking over Elon because this is a waste of space and a terrible solution instead of fixing an energy grid issue.