What is your favorite late 90s/early 2000s car?
>>28506411 (OP)McLaren F1 because I'm a 30+yo boomer that played videogames as a kid.
>it's another misty farting in a dodge magnum guy thread
>>28506432Misty farting guy is another person who kept hijacking my requests.
Maybe the TVR Cerbera. Few cars look so crazy yet so classy
>>28506438no it's you now
sorry i don't make the rules
>>28506439Fairly normal to drive but things like getting in and starting it needs a manual. You're supposed to know what the unlabelled stuff does.
What is the ideal late 1990s/early 2000s Car for the man who seeks to give the image of himself as a man inferior to women in every way, a man who earns less than his female colleagues, has a female boss, and works in a female-dominated job?
>>28506863An automatic New Edge V6 Mustang convertible. Preferably in this colour combo
>>28506868Although I'm not a fan of Ford, much less of muscle cars. Why would a Mustang from the early 2000s give me the impression of being an inferior man to the women I'm after?
>>28506871>Why would a Mustang from the early 2000s give me the impression of being an inferior manIf a V6 automatic convertible isn't lame enough for you then get a Beetle
>>28506880Reasons why the early 2000s Volkswagen New Beetle would give me the image I'm looking for?
Ford GT is probably the only car I'm nostalgic for in that era. FD RX-7 and 993 911 Turbo would be runners up I guess.
If i had the money for 2 cars and a 2 car garage I'd get an mr2 or an rx-7.
But i have a celica as a comfy daily already and don't plan to sell it.
>>28506871>Why would a Mustang from the early 2000s give me the impression of being an inferior man to the women I'm after?Because those same women are already driving Mustangs of their own.
>>28506439Interesting in a bizarre sort of way
>>28507035That makes the your mistake especially egregious.
>>28506871>Why would a Mustang from the early 2000s give me the impression of being an inferior man to the women I'm after?Because it shows that you're trying (buying a sports coupe convertible), and still failing (being an incel)
>>28507007Ford GT is 2004, FD was made until like 99 and the 993 to like 98.
>>28507048FD production concluded in August 2002, as that was when the grace period for the 2000 emissions standards expired.
Different markets stopped selling them at different points, but there was enough stock in Japan for sales to last until mid 2003, just in time for the RX-8.
>>28506411 (OP)Probably the roadmaster idk
This many posts and no Viper? Shame on you faggots.
>>28506848This. The nose, the hood, the way the popups don't sit flush, the t-tops, the spoiler, so good. And that's just the exterior styling
If I had to pick one standout, it would be the Ferrari 250 GTO (1962โ1964).
Why the Ferrari 250 GTO?
1. Stunning Design
The proportions are flawlessโlong hood, low roofline, perfect curves.
Designed with input from both Giotto Bizzarrini and Sergio Scaglietti, itโs aerodynamic art before wind tunnels were common.
2. Legendary Performance
3.0L V12 engine producing ~300 hp.
Lightweight, rear-wheel drive, and built to dominate GT racingโand it did.
3. Racing Pedigree
It won the FIA GT World Championship three years in a row (1962โ1964).
It competed inโand often wonโendurance races like Le Mans, Sebring, and the Targa Florio.
4. Exclusivity
Only 36 cars were built, making it extremely rare and valuable (some have sold for over $70 million).
5. Enduring Legacy
Itโs one of the few classic cars that appeals equally to racers, collectors, and designers. Itโs practically a rolling museum piece and a track beast.
90s
md5: 3ee3a273af139db24a1aac577d58c5ae
๐
>>28506432Worse, it's a "repost from furfaggot reddit" thread and nobody can even pick up on it. A vast majority of current threads on /o/ are shameless reposts from leddit, actually.
>>28507728>and nobody can even pick up on itBecause reddit is for faggots and the only faggot here is OP.
>>28507728It's almost as bad as some faggot recognizing posts from reddit.
>>28506411 (OP)1 Where did you get a fourth gen for Beam? (do want)
2 Why does it have the base spoiler?
>>28506924>a celica as a comfy dailyEww this is EXACTLY why Celicas are doomed: they're used as "fun daily" cope by commuter scum, and are always raped to hell and back. Fuck you it's fucking great that you can't afford 2 cars you nigger.
>>28506411 (OP)>>28506848I'm planning on upgrading from my 87 fiero GT to a newer, faster car and I really want one of these but they're literally slower than C5 but more expensive.
>>28508320its kinda crazy looking back on older performance cars and comparing them to modern stuff
my performance econobox does 0-60 in 4.8 seconds and can easily pull over 1g on stock tires
>>28507287The mk1 focus btfo'd the mk4 in every trim level except the diesel
>>28508327>my performance econoboxWhat car are you talking about?
>>28508353so was my ex but that bitch was tight as shit so sometimes you debadge and hope nobody notices
>>28508366kek i prefer redheads, have 20/20 vision and you won't catch me dead in a fucking polo
>>28508370Like the hot readhead dragon in OP's pic...
>>28507007MR2 came out until the '99 model year. The US stopped getting them in '95.
>>28508506SW20 started in 1989. Can hardly be considered a late 90s/early 00s car
>>28506880Look at that guy's smile, he's happier and therefore more successful than you are
>>28508032Thats exactly what it was designed for you fucking spastic.
>>28506843you can go buy one for $800
>>28506423>30+ >"Boomer"The fuck am I then..?! A fucking mummy?!
>>28507973>2 Why does it have the base spoiler?Some SLP firehawks weren't optioned with the pedestal wing from the T/A.
My beloved, Diamonds forever.
>>28507035Was in production til 1999 though, so I'm willing to give him a pass.
>>28506411 (OP)New beetle, Audi TT, Focus mk1, Mini R50
zoomers cant comprehend how "big" these cars were and out of the box design wise
>>28506439As smol cars go, that's pretty fine looking.
RIP
md5: 4f23be8d7c07bbd23d68136f248e2617
๐
>>28511351It is pretty heavy I can see it. I like the wang though.
>>28512441>>28507973Do fourth gens handle any better than turdgens? I have a turdgen and it has terrible steering response.
>>28512687I'm not sure about 4th gens but I have a 2004 Pontiac GTO and the handling is decent. Is their suspension similar or not really? A lot better than my 2003 Mustang was.
>>28512949The GTO doesn't really share anything at all with a 4th gen F body except having an LS family engine and a T56. A 4th gen has a double wishbone front suspension with a torque arm and rear solid axle, while the GTO has a MacPherson front and trailing arm independent rear suspension.
>>28507452I like it, but I would like it more if it was RWD. An apparently enough people are of that mind they made an AWD kit that uses CR-Vs as donor vehicles.
>>28507728>and nobody can even pick up on it.I'm sorry I've never been on reddit so wouldn't know.
Also TVR Tuscan.
>>28512687Turd gen
>recirculating ball steering and struts 4th gen
>rack and pinion and SLA But if you watch any spectator drags you'd see despite those differences they're pretty evenly matched.
>>28513288>AWD kit that uses CR-Vs as donor vehicles.I know civic modders would do either this or gut an old civic allroad and use those drivelines and center coupling
>>28507971The OP filename starts with "RDT."
>>28506411 (OP)Why the fuck is no one talking about the driver in OP's pic?
>>28513730because this guy is a crossboard meme at this point and it's funny if we just don't acknowledge his weird beamng fetish commissions
i for one admire his dedication
>>28513738I meant who/what is the driver?
>>28513776you know who it is op, it's your mod
>>28513777No, I don't. I just find it weird
>>28508330>supporting ferdslop over peak volkswagenthere's a reason as to why those are extinct nowadays while you'll still see MK4s wherever you look
>>28507728literally nobody cares,besides you just confirmed you are a redditor,faggot
>>28507728imagine not only going on reddit but also following misty farting in magnums guy to reddit
>>28513398>weebs call it "the supercar killer">was even slower than a contemporary corvettewhy are JDMfags so mentally ill,they make troons look sane and well adjusted in comparision
>>28515789It wasn't from a performance standpoint, but a build quality standpoint. You could now have a car that looked like a Ferrari but wasn't nearly as temperamental. You have to keep in mind the 348 was still a thing with the NSX launched and the NSX was FAR more refined in daily driving scenarios. Hence why you see 400k+ mile NSXs and 348s are mostly weekend toys.
>>28513450I like cool OEM wangs, not really a fan of non matching non fitting wangs at least for on my own cars.