>>28512485 (OP)>fasterI don't care I have a motorcycle for fun and I'm already seemingly the only person in my entire city physically capable of merging at speed rather than 30mph below it.
>betterExtremely debateable. Even assuming at least mechanical parity (lmao) nu cars are stuffed full of obnoxious nanny tech and sensor bullshit that does things I didn't ask for and don't want, and an increasing number of these things are even -legally mandated- so I can't even opt out by choosing a lower trim model. All this and they don't perform the action of "driving" any better than my 22 year old car does, all while costing a shitload more both in purchase and ongoing costs like registration and insurance. Other than the most ecoshitbox of ecoshitboxes nu-shit doesn't even get better fuel economy so it's an extremely poor value proposition since it's at best equivalent function for far greater cost.
>b-b-but the cost of repairs!My car is 22 years old and in the 10 years I've owned it I've put less money into it than 6 months of a budget nu-car payment. "Fixing up my old POS" literally costs 20x less than inflicting nu-shit upon myself. I remain unconvinced.
>you're just poor!I don't have a lot of money, but the gap between "poor" and "destitute" is a lot wider without the additional burden of pissing away money on nu-shit I actively hate and will not benefit from.
>>28514163Safety is the forward sensors mistaking a bit of pollen for a brick wall and automatically "emergency" braking you to a full stop in front of 50 tons of tractor-trailer from 75mph.
Safety is a nonstop barrage of mystery chimes and beeps and boops and alarms with no indicated source or resolution because as we all know a distracted driver is a safe driver.
Safety is requiring the driver to look away from the road and navigate nestled touchscreen menus for even the most basic things because a distracted driver is a safe driver.