What is this guy's problem?

>>28515102 (OP)
He hates cars and thinks car owners are all Hitler.
It's the vegan mindset. They hate people who eat meat but failed to realized that the entire world is build on animal bi products.
Just like the entire world is build on cars.
Sure you can eliminate personal car use in some parts of the city, but you'll still need HD trucks for deliveries, construction, ambulance, etc. All these are much heavier, louder, larger vehicles who's meer existence won't allow for smaller streets.
I wouldn't want to be taken to a hospital in a fucking rickshaw, nor does anyone want a fucking cargo bike delivering market groceries, or building equipment.
You can't pave a street with a bike.

But sure. Stroads do suck and being forced to drive everywhere is annoying.
It's nice to walk to places. This won't work on America. His channel need to be region locked imo.

>>28515102 (OP)
he's gay for Amsterdam and it's blinded him to the realities of pretty much every other city in the world, let alone all the places outside of cities

>>28515102 (OP)
It's just the good old radicalization downward spiral.
Start out with "relying on cars for everything and offering no alternatives is bad, actually" and slowly but surely turning it into "cars are bad, actually".

diddled as a kid, diddles kids

>>28515102 (OP)
He's a propagandist, simple as

>>28515129
All media is propaganda.

>>28515102 (OP)
The US needs to deport a lot of people and fill up a lot of jails before I move into a 15 minute city. And I would like to live in one too. But because we let savages and junkies walk the streets, I'm going to live in my suburban house in an HOA.

>>28515102 (OP)
Nothing, after moving to Europe I realized he was absolutely 100% right

>>28515130
When you staunchly view all events through the narrowest possible political lens It can seem like that

>>28515139
It must be nice to live in Poland where they have borders and rules.

>>28515141
It actually is, you have no idea what you're missing out on

>>28515143
I'm getting a little jealous

>>28515110
You forgot to mention that he is one of those brainwashed retards who believes into human made climate change.

Has this faggot ever addressed how he intends to create bike-centric transport in places that aren't flat plains like the Netherlands? Has he ever actually tried biking uphill, especially in one of this precious cargo bikes hauling groceries or whatever?

>>28515132
>in an HOA
You might as well just walk around with a flashing cuck sign around your neck. If anything should be made illegal, it shouldn't be cars, it shoud be fucking HOAs.

>>28515164
no, in fact he has a video on how dutch fixed gear bicycles are the best in the world and you should want one over your lighter and more capable road bike.

>>28515164
You are so right. The bike companies in Seattle have trucks that pick up all the bikes from the bottom of the hills to the top of the hills. They have to do this or no one will ride the bikes.

>>28515168
HOA are based.
>Kicks out joggers for not upkeeping their yards.
>Kicks out border jumpers for running an Autoshop out of their driveway
>Kicks out Jews for running an AirBnB
>Kicks out Muslims for playing call to pray at 4:08am

The only ones HOA can't keep out are the asians.

>>28515125
the classic "all we want are a couple bike lanes and maybe another bus route, guys" -> "abolish p̶r̶i̶v̶a̶t̶e̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶p̶e̶r̶t̶y i mean, privately owned cars" pipeline

>>28515190
How about I can do whatever the fuck I want on my property, fuck everyone else's property values, that ain't my problem.

>>28515200
Go live with the nigger and the Hispanics. They do want every the fuck they want.

I'll gladly mow my lawn between two and a half to three inches if it means my kids won't see drugy shooting up down the street. Sure I would love to live out in the country but I also need a job too.

>>28515170
Most Dutch bikes are not fixed-gear, they're single-speed, although 3-speed and even 6- or 7-speed ones are pretty common too.
Nowadays e-bikes are ridiculously popular and "fatbikes" have taken the place of scooters as the teenage brownoid transport vessel of choice.

>>28515164
not to mention places with less hospitable weather - 3 months of subzero temps, or 3 months of 100+, or constant gusty winds or rain. (and i say all this as a bike commuter)

>>28515162
Next time you fly. Look out the window and observe all the farmland where forests used to be.
Men did all that, and it's not for the good of Earths climate

>>28515222
And then there's the third world, where there isn't even money to pave the roads and the most minimal personal transportation would need to be a motorcycle. Biking on gravel or loose dirt is very tiring.

>>28515232
There are way more trees in the US and on the planet than just 40ish years ago.

https://www.weforum.org/stories/2018/08/planet-earth-has-more-trees-than-it-did-35-years-ago/

>>28515200
Well it's not your property if you don't own the land this is why you should purchase land.

>>28515243
Trees used to timber are not the same as natural forests

>>28515232
they mostly put farmland where grassland used to be, plus orchard where grassland used to be is a net increase in trees

>>28515198
How the fuck did you do a strikethrough?

>>28515267
That mindset is what caused all the fires in Cali and no this reply isn't for you, you shit sucking faggot, this is for all the kids who might fall for what you said.

>>28515364
w̶o̶u̶l̶d̶n̶t̶ y̶o̶u̶ l̶i̶k̶e̶ t̶o̶ k̶n̶o̶w̶ w̶e̶a̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ b̶o̶y̶

>Guy mentions how planting timber doesn't bring back natural ecosystems destroyed to make farm land.
>Other guy (presumably EVfag) gets mad for some reason and blames fires on someone who just wants nature to thrive.
Elon isn't sending his best.

Total /n/igger death

Do your job you uselss tranny janny, why are these fucking /n/iggers discussing bicycles on /o/, delete their shit and rangeban them.

Idk why he triggers so many people when he's 100% right on taking retards off the road and onto busses so I can drive on traffic free roads.
You arent a city dweller are you /o/?

>>28515432
>on taking retards off the road and onto busses so I can drive on traffic free roads.
you actually fell for one of their favorite cons. he's not just trying to take retards off the road and put them onto busses, he's trying to take (you) off the road too. it doesn't stop with new bus routes and bike lanes

>>28515407
I don't but I still jerk off to fake tits so who cares if someone planted a tree of if it is a natural tree.

>>28515102 (OP)
His beer belly.

>>28515102 (OP)
Hes a faggot in europe what did you expect?

>>28515102 (OP)
Kill all /n/iggers

>>28515102 (OP)
He and his fans should be killed. He is anticar moron and his concent are completely /n/, nothing that should be ever discussed at /o/.

Has he ever done videos on the following
>How to avoid a flat bike tire from aids needles
>How to throw bags of white powder to confuse junkies.
>How to jump over the sleeping homeless on your bike

>>28515488
it's funny how the people who most advocate for walkability/public transit never understand that the easiest way to get people on it is to lock up the junkies and crazies.
always mental hurdles to avoid just throwing the guy who shoots up on the bus in jail

>>28515492
Imagine for a moment a world where half naked homeless ladies and Bluetooth speaker playing rap or sinky india people weren't on the bus.

>>28515164
e-bike solves that

>>28515584
>ebike get stolen
Either you rent a bike or you buy a bike and it gets stolen and the cops do shit all about stolen bikes.

>>28515450
This is just a straight up lie. He has videos dedicated to how urbanism improves driving too, and agrees that cars make sense in exurban and rural areas.

>>28515601
Or we can deport illegals and fix traffic that way

>>28515222
Helsinki has snow for five months a year and people manage.

>>28515110
>He hates cars and thinks car owners are all Hitler.
untrue. he just thinks making cities car-only makes for bad cities, and he's correct.

>>28515634
I think homelessness, drugs, and mass immigration have destroyed the cities in which he is dreaming of.

>>28515648
and bulldozing vibrant, taxpaying downtown areas for more car space makes them... better?

>>28515663
Fuck yeah walkable cities!

>>28515685
it's almost as if bankrupting your city by bulldozing all the downtown areas and draining all your resources maintaining the suburbs every year leads to a reduction in funds available for social services.

>>28515690
Read up on the Great Migration
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Migration_(African_American)
And isn't it interesting that the Great Migration was followed up by White flight?
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_flight#United_States

>>28515702
not until you read up on basic urban planning and how urban sprawl demonstrably bankrupts cities.

>>28515601
>>28515584
>>28515663
>>28515690
>>28515708
Kill yourself /n/igger

>>28515690
>a reduction in funds available for social services.
Good. What are the benefits of feeding scumbags?

>>28515716
Social services includes roads, sewers, and the police.

>>28515102 (OP)
his problem is being too based for this world

>>28515716
>feeding scumbags?
Suburbanites and their lifestyle are subsidized by the people in downtown
you're the scumbag that needs feeding anon

>>28515267
That's right, they're healthier

>>28515745
Why do cities always consume more tax funding than they produce then?

>>28515919
cities including suburbs or excluding suburbs?
rural areas are even bigger leeches

>>28516511
>rural areas are uhhh le leaches
>because it’s so hard for the gubermint to build 3 miles of dirt road to your house
>live in a pod so you can share 1,000 ft of asphalt with the other 2,000 residents of your apartment tower
>we’ll just magic food into existence

>>28515102 (OP)
>be corporate stooge
>get rich being a corporate stooge
>move to rich city
>"woah this is nice, why aren't all cities like this?"
>because not all cities are ri-
>"this must be because of urban planning and ONLY urban planning and therefore should be an example to all other places"
>yeah but most places won't be able to affor-
>"clearly the main reason all cities aren't like this is because of carbrained NIMBYs and the american mindset"
It's the midlife-crisis version of trustfund kids going to Bali for a sabbatical and wondering why every other place isn't as chill and cool (it's chill and cool because you were in a place built specifically for rich western college kids and frequented nothing but rich western college kids).

Still, it could be worse than this guy because at least the plans and developments he talks about are nice and he describes them well until he starts waxing poetics about how nice it is to not have cars.
It could be much worse.
It could be AdamSomething.

>>28515102 (OP)
Remove nons and his ideas would sort of work. Of course, the way his stance on cars came to be was through a left-wing point of view, thus the nons should be allowed to be even non-ier in his eye.
Verdict: RETARD

>one (1) city has decent bike infrastructure and population that cycles
>lets ruin every fucking city on the planet, butcher the speed limits, speed bumps on every corner and mandatory black boxes in every car
>the retarded cyclists still cycling in the middle of the road instead of his lane

I support cyclist genocide at this point

>>28515663
Yeah, so, this. Jews. All jews.
Soon as the war ended the primary goal was sabotage of the united states:
>mandate integration
>then demolish downtowns :^)
>displacing the nons elsewhere
>forcing use of cars
>absolute disaster
>whites lose the city
>whites lose any sort of ability to say NO
>at least cars are good right now
>debase the currency
>economy goes fucky wucky
>twice
>make cars shit
>twice
>destroy a bunch of old cars, ratchet effect fucks the price forever
>make cars worse again, legitimately undriveable
>>you are here

>>28515663
Yes. Creation of dense cities, apartments are biggest mistakes that humans have created. Kys you /n/ or /pol/ spammers, you should be totally banned from posting anything at /o/.

>>28515102 (OP)
paid shill

>>28516571
non argument
ruralfags are welfare queens that would live like niggers in cowshit mudhuts if it wasn't for the money, resources and tech from the cities

>>28516592
If the bike paths aren't pantsu-on-headsu-retardedsu in design then the cyclists will ride there because fuck being overtaken by cars or city buses.
The "cyclists" on the road typically ride pic, which is exclusively used by the stunning, brave and diverse doordashers.
>t. cycles and drives downtown

>>28516694
the brown doordashers you are referring to ride those at 25 on the bike paths
>t. cycles and drives in the suburbs

>>28516726
I can see a simple solution to our problems then :
Ban browns.

>>28515102 (OP)
He has a point, but the way he goes about convincing people is condescending. He talks down to you like someone would talk down to children. Completely knee caping any chance he has of swaying people's opinion on walkable cities. Besides the people who glaze him in the comments. But those people didn't need convincing.

But to his points, I've lived in both types of towns in the US. I lived in towns where I only drove a few times a week. And now live in a town that has a patchwork of sidewalks. Random crosswalks. And bicycles being a no go with how people drive. It actually kind of sucks. Some kid gits hit by a car every year. Cyclists get hit all the time. And random people just walk through parking lots and streets. Its actually makes it a worse driving experience dodging people walking on the side of the road.

>>28515164
His answer would be "uuuuuh erm uuh ebikes".
The correct answer is "git gud, git fit, your city does not have 45 degree inclines because econoboxes couldn't climb these either. If a Smart two-door can climb it, (you) can climb it"

>>28515727
no that's utilities and infrastructure you disingenuous bastard

>>28515110
Fpbp, also highly underrated

>>28515601
Look, people bring up the "being an enthusiast would be easier with less people on the road", but do you think learning to ride a horse is easier or more available than it was a hundred and fifty years ago or now. The idea that getting cars off the rode will make it better for enthusiasts is assuming you're one of the spared ivory tower types. If you get less cars on the road, that just means only expensive cars will be on the road >>28515690
Mentally ill homeless people need to just be put in the loony bin; giving them hand outs or hoping they might show up to therapy instead of doing heroin in the streets is good for no one

I would love to have safe cities I could walk or ride my bike in. But the issue is that the city governments don't enforce the rules. Lock up the crazies and drugies... then I might live in your stupid city until then I'm driving to work so I don't have to smell the homeless man who hasn't showered in 17 months.

>>28515164

it's incredible how he completely demolished literally every single pro-car argument in existence
seriously, is there ONE (1) valid argument against what he's proposing?

>d-druggies and crazies
don't live in a third world undeveloped garbage pile of a country

>>28515110
>Sure you can eliminate personal car use in some parts of the city, but you'll still need HD trucks for deliveries, construction, ambulance, etc. All these are much heavier, louder, larger vehicles who's meer existence won't allow for smaller streets.
he already defeated that argument
https://youtu.be/j2dHFC31VtQ?si=t_zy0RpBtB3WgHed&t=1

>>28516835
I agree American fire trucks are dumb. But they're never going away in our lifetime just like how the American school bus will never change. The people that make them are in bed with politicians.

>>28515102 (OP)
carfags should be pro-public transport
the more people can commute using trains and bikes, the less congested the roads will be
the problem right now is that we have two crowds- "fuck trains" (us) and "fuck cars" (him), but it shouldn't be like that
we should stop asking to give less to the other guy, we should just both demand more

>>28516817
Now, place one of those anywhere near a culturally enriched individual.
>just don't live in cities with them
so like the suburbs

Cyclists should pay a tax and have to put a "road tax paid" sticker on their bikes if they want to use roads. Tired of these fuckers thinking they can have a free lunch. Buncha leeches.

>>28516880
I don't understand this image. What is wrong with the guy on the left?

I want all those "walkable cities" retards to spend 3 months working for some package delivery service in central london and then ask them what they think of their own opinions.

>>28516903
picunrel

>>28515200
I’m gonna do whatever I want with my property, like only sell it to someone who agrees to join the HOA, and agrees further to only sell it to someone later on that joins the HOA too

>>28516817
>Services a single user
>Has to make a full return trip to be used again
>Open cable channel in a public road
>Sealed in the roadway so repairs are harder
>uses power that cyclists claim they never use
>No controls, safeties or emergency stop
Extremely retarded. Even Moving sidewalks would work better

>>28516824
He hasn't thought?

>>28516817
Why don't they just get off their bike and walk it up the mountain. Lazy assholes.

>>28516862
I wouldn't mind taking a train to work

>>28516835
That ultimately has nothing to do with large vehicles, and that fire departments are called in for every booboo emergency call

>>28516916
Any problem identified in London is a London issue and nothing else. This place is irredeemable.

>>28516817
>alright bikefag WAIT the 3 mins until your steppy step went back down for your turn.

>>28515102 (OP)
Didn't have a good father figure is the usual suspect.

>>28515267
Natural forests are nice, however fast growth timber is still absorbing Co2 from the atmosphere. Just sucks all of it is fucking useless when you need a 2x4 that isn't twisted, bent, or full of knots.

>>28516694
Wish these things existed when I was a kid. You could get a dirt bike or one of those weird kits to retrofit your bike with a two stroke.

>>28515102 (OP)
cares about not being underwater and thus makes thirdies seethe

>>28518328
>underwater cities never
megassa sad-sad

>>28518342
in the future, cities will be underwater
- john oceangate

>>28516824
You mean Western Eurotrash cities full of rapefugees and no-go zones? You mean those /n/igger?

>>28515102 (OP)
how can you have a double chin when you bike everywhere?

>>28518312
They could dry the wood for longer, but that is expensive.

>>28515102 (OP)
He makes retarded conservatives seethe so he's based as fuck

>>28515102 (OP)
>rides a bike
>still a doughy faggot
kek, how even

>>28515208
>needing the Karen brigade to keep trashy people away
Why don't you live where those things aren't in the first place?

>>28518663
If it was 100 years ago in 1925 I would beat the shit out of a colored man playing their new fangled radio too loud at 2am. If the cop showed he would tell that colored man not to do it again or he would help beat the shit out of him.

We don't live in that world anymore. I would go to jail and the nigger would be held up as a pillar of society. But this is where a 230lbs, 5ft-3, 49-year-old woman walks around with her fucking clipboard and fines him until he moves. I just need to keep my yard nice, which only takes an hour a week to do.

I would like to do it the way we did it in 1925.

>>28518661
that's part of the joke of his worldview, riding a bike is trivially easy and convenient *specifically* in amsterdam. it's super flat, you can only ever get up to ~10mph because of all the bike/pedestrian traffic, rides are short. it's barely even exercise. compare that to us cities where your morning commute would be an hour uphill in 20mph headwinds

>>28518708
>compare that to us cities where your morning commute would be an hour uphill in 20mph headwinds
in his ideal worldview your city gets compacted down as much as Amsterdam and you’re all but forbidden from living more than 3 miles from your job.

>thread is still here
genocide every single tranny janny, souyteens were right in hacking you useless fucking niggers

>>28518891

>>28518897

>>28518900

>>28518902

>>28518905

>>28518907

>>28518916

>>28518917

>>28518921

>>28518922

>>28518924

>>28518925
inb4 the nigger tranny janny deletes my posts and let's this off-topic thread alive because he is a /n/igger himself as he does it for no monetary compensation

>deletes one post
>leaves the thread here
kill yourself subhuman tranny janny, get fucking maimed /n/igger janny

Uh oh, Mazda3fag is having a melty again.

>>28519404
I don't drive a MAzda 3 you retarded fucking /n/igger

This thread is so funny to me as a cyclist and car guy living in a dense city.

Like bro makes some valid points, y'all just get hyper defensive. >much lanes

>>28519649
y'alla habibi

>>28519649
die /n/igger

>>28519649
>as a cyclist and a car guy
And which one did you lead with? Kill yourself nigger

>>28515102 (OP)
hes a larper journalist pretending to be a architect

>>28518461
>>28518661
ebikes are ALWAYS the answer :v)
>it's a bicycle but you don't exercise
>it's a bicycle but it's expensive
>it's a bicycle but it's perishable
>it's a moped but you have short range limitations
>it gets you gold, it gets you wet
>it shits the bed if the hill is too steep

>>28518905
Driver skintone : checked

i've noticed how every "argument" against this guy is basically just "we need to get the fuck away from the minorities we imported"

>>28519984
>we
maybe you did goldberg, I didn’t

America needs to stay car-centric forever.
>>28519157
I agree. Present 4chan /o/ moderator is lazy traitor, who should be ass-kicked out from his job and replaced by more active moderator with procar mindset.

>>28519614
And yet you never post car.

>>28515102 (OP)
All this rhetoric against cars and suburbs is but a pretext for dekulakiation, suburbanites being the new kulaks.

>>28515102 (OP)
look at his face

just your typical leftoid subhuman

>>28519984
>we imported
I fucking didn't. And it's a perfectly valid argument.

>>28516862
>the more people can commute using trains and bikes, the less congested the roads will be
Absolutely. If I had that pic about 30 people in 30 cars vs one bus I'd post, but don't.

Instead here's pic from the GM Futurama from the 1939 World's Fair. The idea here was segregating traffic and pedestrians from each other. Kinda hard to get hit by a car if it's literary not on your level.

>>28520132
>forgets pic

>>28519984
I did not import them but I will deport them. The best part is that it fixes traffic