Thread 28528766

>under 3 s - super fast car
>3-4 s - very fast car
>4-6 s - fast car
>6-9 s - moderately fast car
>9-12 s - moderately slow car
>12-15 s - slow car
>15-20 s - very slow car
>over 20 s - super slow car
>it doesn't - a golf cart

>>28528766 (OP)
6-9s 0-60 is SLOW as FUCK

>>28528766 (OP)
0-60 is a shitty way to measure speed too. Should be 80-180mph. Or AT LEAST 60-130mph or 1/4mi time godsDAMN bmaooo0o0o0

>>28528769
Why are you so cruel to Miata?

>>28528766 (OP)
2.5s
I mean I've never actually hooked mine up to specialist timing gear but that's what it's supposed to do.

>>28528776
One of my favorite cars gets a ~6.66s 0-60. It's fuckin slow. I'm not going to say it's fast just because I love the car; that would be disingenuous

>>28528795
>~6.66s

>>28528766 (OP)
Very fast car

0-60 in 4.83 seconds

>>28528793
post car and dick

>>28528766 (OP)
my 3 speed auto v6 fiero that goes 0-60 in the low 8's is not "moderately fast"

>>28528766 (OP)
6 or 7 seconds maybe, i dont know
other car is 18 seconds

>>28529102
Model S Performance. A really overlooked car imo. They only made them for 2 years and it's the fastest non-plaid Tesla. You can find them for under 40k in excellent condition.

>>28528766 (OP)
6-9s is average, not moderately fast. The entire 'moderate' should be removed

>>28528769
>>28528795
>>28529105
>>28529132
you have never driven a slow car

>>28529129
Shit interior, one trick pony, makes you look like even more of a fucking dork bmaooo0o0o0

>>28528772
Why? most "car enthusiasts" aren't actually tracking their cars. Accelerating up to highway speeds is a good measure of practical fun for most cars.

>>28529135
I've driven plenty of slow cars. I was stuck with a mirage rental and it was SLOW as FUCK. That made me actually swear I'd never rent a car I'm not actively trying to buy

>>28528766 (OP)
3.5 sec electric suv. Suv are totally homosex with ICE. My Y performance everything low to the ground.

>>28528772
Cars below moderately fast category can't reach 130 mph

>The 2019 Honda Civic Type R typically achieves 0 to 60 mph in around 4.9 to 5.4 seconds. Some performance tests have shown slightly quicker times, potentially as low as 4.9 seconds, while others have reported times around 5.4 seconds.
Hitting those in a stick shift with not-the-smoothest 1->2 sounds not likely desu.
I'm surprised that cars like a 911 gt3 and a ct5-v blackwing are < 4s. That is fast and a smooth trans (tr6060 supremacy gang stand up?)

>>28529142
Has nothing to do with going to the track
And 60mph on the freeway is SLOW
Get the FUCK out of the fucking passing lane when you see those Angel Eyes and roundel witchya fuckin 60mph drivin ahh ass godsDAMN bmaooo0o0o0

>>28529135
The standards for "fast" increase over time as technology improves. Why can't boomers grasp this fucking concept? Time did not freeze when you were in your twenties.

>>28529150
False. My E39 530i can cruise at 130mph and it isn't fast

>>28528766 (OP)
4.2s 0-60 mph
12.6s @ 114.0 mph 1/4th mile
25.2 s 0-150 mph

It's fun.

>>28529153
>tfw I have a TR-6060
Feels great man. If your manufacturer doesn't put a TR-6060 or at the bare minimum a TR-3160 they're being cheap fucks.

>>28528766 (OP)
My sedan is 6.2 seconds.
My coupe is 9 seconds.
They get the job done.

>>28528766 (OP)
4.2 apparently

>>28529140
Whatever helps you sleep at night pal. At the end of the day if we line up at a red light I'm winning every single time.

>>28529179
LOL not a chance, pal
Also, stop light races are for PUSSIES. What's the 80-180 on those things again?
Oh, and where the fuck is "night pal?"

Why are you trying to go fast? You late or something? How about just go slow and chill.

>>28529129
LOL

>>28529193
Sometimes a red-blooded man likes to rip it up.

>>28529187
>criticizes one car for being a one trick pony because it's only good for one specific measurement of acceleration
>also dedicates his entire life to focusing on one other specific measurement of acceleration

>>28529198
>nooo only black or indigenous criminals of color like to drive fast!!!

>>28529199
>thinks being able to do 180 requires complete focus and dedication
Your car is slow, sonnyboy; get over it

>>28529165
I'm jelly man. My "muscle" car back in the day was that dogshit MT82 but the GT350's came with TR6060s!

>>28529155
i am in my twenties

>>28529213
>GT350's came with TR6060s
Bro, not even the GT350 has a TR-6060. Ford are such cheap jews they put the TR-3160 in the Dark Horse and GT350. That's the same transmission that Chevy uses for their fucking V6 Camaro. The V8 Camaro has the TR-6060. Only the GT500 ever came with a TR-6060. The only Ford to ever do so.

>>28529224
I'd rather have a TH400 who cares bmaooo0o0o0
mustangs and camaros are for injuns and mexicans, and muslims and mexicans, respectively

under 3 gang ww@

>>28528766 (OP)
Managed a 4.0 once. Usually it’s 4.5-4.8

8.2 seconds, babby, yeah!
Feel the power!

>>28529213
Mt82 is fine if you know how to shift properly. You’re just a retarded amateur poser.

>>28529227
You’re just a white nigger

>>28528766 (OP)
>6-9 s - moderately fast car
You know the best selling vehicles on the planet do it in under 6, right? That's sure as fuck not fast.

>>28529663
>"Carpe Noctem" tattoo around eyeball
Bad to the bone.

>>28528766 (OP)
modded polo g40: 5s
peugeot 206 1.1: 15s
audi a3 1.9 tdi: 10s
clio mk1 1992: eventually

>>28528766 (OP)
4.9, it’s nice.

>>28529227
Beemers are junk

>>28528766 (OP)
10.7
for hard top convertible with a smoll 1.4L petrol engine is not that bad.

>>28531040
Beemers are motorcycles

>>28528766 (OP)
That probably takes about 9 seconds. On the other hand, at 110 mph it's weirdly serene on Raceway 34, as locals call it.

>>28529711
OP and the thread specified cars, not your "Im totally not scared of driving" passenger-tanks that get to "cheat" accel stats by having rear diff ratios intended for heavy load work.
If I were to drop a measly 3.73 in my shitbox it'd embarass a truck. You need that just to get moving at a normal pace.

>>28528766 (OP)
Mechanically limited top speed of about 55mph, so golf cart I guess.