>>28551871
>>28551918
>>28552040
low IQ doesn't necessarily mean mentally retarded. there's a whole xitter thread about this
https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1712174161521496434?lang=en
but tl;dr: what is considered retarded for one population might just be considered the average for another. they don't look or act retarded, they're just slower and less intelligent.
imagine if you had two populations A and B, where A's average top running speed was significantly higher than B's. someone from A with a physical leg disability might run as fast as the average individual from B, but that average individual from B wouldn't be considered disabled. they'd have normal, functioning legs that just so happen to be slower.