>>28562984
>>28563079
>>28563167
>>28563251
>>28563287
I'd say there's only a 10% chance, at best, that he was a Jewish puppet to allow the engagement of WW2.
Have you guys listened to his speeches translated through AI? powerful, truthful stuff. There's a lot of parallels between the Weimar Republic and today...and they aren't positive.
Have you guys read much about Stalin, Bolsheviks, and the ties to Jews and Marxism? Stalin was the most evil guy ever, he killed more people than Mao and more brutally, right on Europe's doorstep.
Stalin was gearing up to come into Europe and do more of that. Hitler was onto him. Hitler was totally vindicated in arming up.
Hitler didn't want war with Europe. He wanted pre Versailles German soil (and people) back. He non violently expelled Jews first, as above they were the subversive link that allowed Stalin to do what he did.
Hitler took out advertisements in UK papers and appealed for peace between European nations. Churchill was backed by global banking Jews, and USA similarly. They were on a roll because WW1 had allowed them to establish the federal reserve and have total control over currency. Hitler wasn't playing in their currency system, so had to be eliminated (same as Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi more recently)
If Hitler had won, we'd have beautiful German cars with no emmissions regulations, plentiful cheap petrol, zero illegal immigrants, and the same purchasing power on the dollar that our great grandfathers had.
