>>28569030
Totals based on
>Training reimbursements
>Tax Credits & Rebates
>Property tax abatement
>Federal grants
>State or local grants
So when theres a gay "training" campaign mandated and paid by the government thats a subsidy?
So when they're taking advantage of the tax code (the law) thats a subsidy?
So when they are offered abatements on property taxes to build a billion dollar facility and employ hundreds or thousands of workers, thats a subsidy?
So when the feds have progrums to influence industry, thats a subsidy?
The only subsidies I'm seeing on this is state or local grants which again, are to incentivize companies to spend billions and hire thousands is somehow a bad thing?
Pull your head out of your ass and realize tax breaks (taxes are too fucking high) aren't subsidies. Thats just tax code. The government didn't give Ford $7.7B in cash because their trucks are so good. They "gave" them (on average) of $308,000,000 per year. 308 million for Ford is probably what they spend on electricity at 2 of their assembly lines per year. And again, that wasn't an average of $308million in cash being given to them, it was often just tax rebates. So if we're looking at this objectively, most of that is just a tax savings that required 50x in spending on Ford's behalf to be eligible for those tax savings.
Now do the inverse: how much in taxes does Ford pay per year. Hint; as little as possible because thats following our extra gay tax laws that you're conflating with free government money.
>>28569036
Disingenuous infographs, every company takes advantage of US tax laws to claim a loss on a section of the business, and technically that counts against taxes they otherwise would have to pay. Anon is mad because they have good accountants and doesn't know how businesses and profits work.
