>>28573516
Not flush and angled back ones (on a rounder body) like the W210 cursed us with making popular. The X300 XJ immediately before that S type still had upright sealed beams on a boxier body that still look alright. The flush non-sealed beams on the X350 don't look good either.
>>28573543 >>28573545
this is like coping and saying you invented the cheese burger, and then when someone points to a much earlier cheese burger, you say "yea, but i invented the one with bacon".
look up the development of the S type. they were taking after the early jags. they weren't looking at merc shit at all.
Yes when its come out it was ugly . But now when world have seen such abominations like nissan juke , C8 , multiple bmw's , multiple electric shits . It can't be called ugly anymore
>>28576205
Pretty much.
Same story with alfa GTV/Spider with that boxy ass, ridiculed when it came out, now it'll mog everything around it in the average parking lot in the current year
>>28573502 (OP)
How are the supercharged models? I see lots of them but very few base V8's. I might have to get the supercharged model at my $6500 budget.