← Home ← Back to /o/

Thread 28573502

28 posts 20 images /o/
Anonymous No.28573502 >>28573511 >>28573880 >>28576163 >>28576205 >>28578613 >>28578614 >>28579231 >>28579473 >>28579498 >>28579575
Wait, people thought this car was ugly?
Anonymous No.28573506
It IS ugly, inbred.
Anonymous No.28573511 >>28573516 >>28573536 >>28573609
>>28573502 (OP)
Yes, and so is the Mercedes it copied.
Anonymous No.28573516 >>28573543 >>28573892
>>28573511
jag had the quad bug lights as far back as the 50s.
Anonymous No.28573536
>>28573511
I hate these POS so much. If you ever have worked on one, then you know exactly what I mean.
Anonymous No.28573543 >>28573545 >>28573551 >>28573859
>>28573516
Not flush and angled back ones (on a rounder body) like the W210 cursed us with making popular. The X300 XJ immediately before that S type still had upright sealed beams on a boxier body that still look alright. The flush non-sealed beams on the X350 don't look good either.
Anonymous No.28573545 >>28573551
>>28573543
Anonymous No.28573551
>>28573543
>>28573545
this is like coping and saying you invented the cheese burger, and then when someone points to a much earlier cheese burger, you say "yea, but i invented the one with bacon".

look up the development of the S type. they were taking after the early jags. they weren't looking at merc shit at all.
Anonymous No.28573609
>>28573511
Anonymous No.28573859
>>28573543
An inevitable outcome of aerodynamic advancement.
Anonymous No.28573880
>>28573502 (OP)
Not the whole thing, just the body lines, the ass-end and obviously the fugly-ass front.
Anonymous No.28573892
>>28573516
So did corvettes
Anonymous No.28576163 >>28577563
>>28573502 (OP)
>Wait, people thought this car was ugly?
It's a pastiche
Anonymous No.28576205 >>28578602
>>28573502 (OP)

Yes when its come out it was ugly . But now when world have seen such abominations like nissan juke , C8 , multiple bmw's , multiple electric shits . It can't be called ugly anymore
Anonymous No.28577563
>>28576163
No it's a Jaguar retard
Anonymous No.28578602
>>28576205
Pretty much.
Same story with alfa GTV/Spider with that boxy ass, ridiculed when it came out, now it'll mog everything around it in the average parking lot in the current year
Anonymous No.28578613
>>28573502 (OP)
It looks like a jumping spider sucking a lemon.
Anonymous No.28578614
>>28573502 (OP)
yes, because it's ugly.
p No.28578615 >>28579067
kia did it best
Anonymous No.28579067
>>28578615
Oh look! A strawberry!
Anonymous No.28579231
>>28573502 (OP)
Pig ugly compared to pic from Jaguars sister company which was launched at the same time.
Anonymous No.28579473 >>28579476
>>28573502 (OP)
How are the supercharged models? I see lots of them but very few base V8's. I might have to get the supercharged model at my $6500 budget.
Anonymous No.28579476
>>28579473
A bit more whiney than the regular ones. The base car is what you budget servicing for.
Anonymous No.28579498
>>28573502 (OP)
Compared to the beautiful machinery Jaguar used to turn out?
Yes, the new models are hideous.
Anonymous No.28579575
>>28573502 (OP)
Cousin had it early 2000, it's actually comfy to ride.
Anonymous No.28579579
>this dude simping for a 2005 Kia Amanti
Owner-Optimus Not Primefag !hoSMSS3fmY No.28579619 >>28580705
This is now a Jaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagg thread.
Anonymous No.28580705
>>28579619
Are you the cretin claimed to have been doing 155 when a cross-wind blew you across 3 lanes and caused a sphincter malfunction?