>>28578061
>Not him, but 20 years ago was 2005.
Did you get your theoretical math degree from MIT? Who cares if 20 year old tech is still computers and screens? I'm not sure why nobody told you, but we're not going back to the 1970s where nothing was computer and nothing was screen. Yeah they're imperfect because its tech from 20 years ago but you're comparing that old shit to screens from today, which means a screen from today is pretty darn good, barring european nonsense that makes no sense.
>also isn't at all the analogue experience people want.
Turns out everyone wants infotainment screens. They're just better. CarPlay and AA are superior to EVERYTHING car makers have ever tried in the past. How the fuck else do you want to get your phone to play audio through speakers? Navigate? and do things like display the federally required backup camera? You can't and theres a reason 99.99% of cars come with infotainment screens
>it also has a digital dash
Thats the only point I'll concede, a digital dash with physical needles moving would be better, but very few people who actually buy cars (not jerkoffs on /o/ that spout autistic complaints over shit they can't afford) are willing to buy.
>some babble about the drivetrain
We're discussing the interior and driver position, sweaty. see
>>28578052 for extra credit.