← Home ← Back to /o/

Thread 28588021

154 posts 72 images /o/
Anonymous No.28588021 >>28588022 >>28588026 >>28588057 >>28588116 >>28588133 >>28588535 >>28588865 >>28589308 >>28589398 >>28589454 >>28589456 >>28589638 >>28589644 >>28589814 >>28591144 >>28591313 >>28591333 >>28592273 >>28593354 >>28593717 >>28594044 >>28598764 >>28599106
What are the most indestructible engines made
Engines that are known to handle man’s stubbornness and abuse , engines what will outlast the entire frame of the vehicle it is mounted on
Anonymous No.28588022 >>28592071
>>28588021 (OP)
We've had this thread before. Buick 3800 v6, Ford 300 i6, really any straight 6 not made by krauts.
Anonymous No.28588026 >>28588535
>>28588021 (OP)
350 chebby
Anonymous No.28588027 >>28588028 >>28588079 >>28589465
6bt 12 valve cummings
Anonymous No.28588028 >>28588032 >>28588073
>>28588027
Overrated
Anonymous No.28588032 >>28588054
>>28588028
International is no better
Anonymous No.28588033 >>28588106
Anonymous No.28588036 >>28592466 >>28598815
Anonymous No.28588041 >>28588044 >>28588091 >>28588535 >>28588626 >>28591954
ford barra
toyota 1uz, 5sfe
buick 3800
chrysler slant six
mercedes m103
Anonymous No.28588044 >>28591954
>>28588041
oops.
>toyota jz
Anonymous No.28588054 >>28588079 >>28589468
>>28588032
Are you going to compare that tractor engine with pic.
Anonymous No.28588057 >>28593373
>>28588021 (OP)

VW 1.9 TDI . Nothing else comes even close .
Anonymous No.28588060 >>28588956
Ford Vulcan 3.0 and cologne 4.0
Anonymous No.28588073 >>28588199
>>28588028
Whadya mean overrated? Its one of the best 4 stroke diesels made. They have pretty much no flaw and don't need electronics
Anonymous No.28588074 >>28588263 >>28589468 >>28593648
Has a timing gear because a metal chain could stretch. The only engines that have fewer moving parts are rotaries. This was basically the first gasoline engine that would reliably get to 250,000 miles with just an oil change. Every one of them is capable of running today decades after the men who made them have died.
Anonymous No.28588079 >>28588199 >>28589468
>>28588027
>>28588054
Never understood why those idiots compare this to 7.3 or dt446
Anonymous No.28588091 >>28589465 >>28597020
>>28588041
STRONG
MUSCULAR
S MOTORS
Anonymous No.28588106
>>28588033
This, especially the later ones with thicker h-rods and oil squirters
Anonymous No.28588108 >>28588271
Iron duke
Toyota AZ engine
Anonymous No.28588116 >>28588303 >>28594302
>>28588021 (OP)
B18c with ebay turbo running 24psi
Anonymous No.28588123 >>28591954 >>28601526
Saab H engine
Toyota L diesel
Toyota 4afe
Anonymous No.28588133
>>28588021 (OP)
They will ALL be industrial or commercial engines, not a single one of the top ten will be a toyota product.
Anonymous No.28588140
3406E
Detroit 671
Anonymous No.28588185
Isuzu 4H
Anonymous No.28588199 >>28588291
>>28588073
I think he means that people act like they're god's gift to trucks or something. Cummins B series kick ass but some people act like they literally can't go wrong when it's possible to push or abuse any engine too far.

>>28588079
The 7.3 IDI's and Powerstrokes competed directly against the 6BT in light trucks, and the B series was original meant for medium duty trucks the same as the DT line. Why wouldn't they be compared?
Anonymous No.28588263 >>28588305
>>28588074
I believe the light-duty engines got a fiber timing gear which is known to fail sometimes.
Anonymous No.28588271
>>28588108
>Iron duke
holy based
Anonymous No.28588291
>>28588199
>Why wouldn't they be compared?
An industrial tractor engine
Compared to a fleet truck engine
Anonymous No.28588303
>>28588116
I made this pic 5 or 6 years ago, very nice to see it again. Thanks anon
Anonymous No.28588305 >>28588313 >>28588322 >>28588406 >>28589362
>>28588263
Jesus, I wasn't aware they tried a "fiber" gear for a while. Seems like the boomers on 10 year old forum posts say 30+ years of use they're happy with the material. Others saying when their truck was at 200k miles back in 1982 the fiber gear failed when they were towing a tractor up hill or some shit.

Seems like a decent material if thats the case, but how much money could they possibly have been saving going from all metal to fiber teeth? The only thing that makes sense is the fiber tooth was simply quieter when running. Regardless, I imagine removing and replacing that fiber gear or if we're talking a "like new" engine it isn't likely to fail immediately.
Anonymous No.28588313 >>28588319
>>28588305
ford cant design a good engine without including a crippling flaw just for giggles. Think of it like an easter egg
Anonymous No.28588319 >>28588375
>>28588313
>ford cant design a good engine without including a crippling flaw just for giggles. Think of it like an easter egg
They've got plenty of good engines, and to point out "flaws" that become known 100k miles in isn't really a major negative. Yes that sentence was cope, but an engine that can make it to 100k miles with just oil changes is good. Submerged timing belts shouldn't be a thing, but if its reasonably easy (inexpensive) to change then fine. Stuff like the hellcat engine basically requiring a full overhaul is different than the timing gear behind 1 protective cover goes bad at 100k+ miles and 30 minutes of labor.
Anonymous No.28588322
>>28588305
Well, my F150 with the 4.9 had a fiber gear and it ran fine for 35 years. I replaced it with a steel gear recently just to be safe. However, it's definitely noisier now than before.
Anonymous No.28588375 >>28588388
>>28588319
holy shit try to take farley's cock out of your mouth, you might breathe easier
Anonymous No.28588388
>>28588375
Okay, tell me a manufacturer or brand of engines that have crippling flaws.

I only pointed out a complex machine that vibrates, spins, and gets really hot is always going to have a flaw even when in the category of "most indestructible" like a Ford300.
Scarlett No.28588406 >>28588493
>>28588305
They revisited the fiber gears again for the V4's they made later on as well. Ford has seemed to have a fascination with pressed fiber gears all the way back to the model T. But this is also the company that recently brought you a wet belt diesel engine. I'm convinced they get off on bad ideas.
Anonymous No.28588493 >>28588599
>>28588406
>But this is also the company that recently brought you a wet belt diesel engine. I'm convinced they get off on bad ideas.
Was Ford really the first to ever do that? What was that engine, I wouldn't mind learning a bit more about it. I guess they're trying new shit but at the same time it just comes across as bean counters thinking they can make a worse "part" to save 12 cents instead of just doing it right.

The fiber teeth in the 300 seems to make sense considering its noticably quieter and seems to last a reasonably long time along with being easy to replace and its not an interference engine. Wet belts that require the front half of the car to be disassembled and must be replaced after 75k miles because they're known to break is retarded. Ford isn't alone in the retarded cost-saving camp.
Anonymous No.28588515
What if I said

GM LY6 aka 6.0l Vortec?
Anonymous No.28588535 >>28588900
>>28588021 (OP)
5sfe, with the exception of pre 97 graphite head gaskets
>>28588026
Inb4 intake manifold coolant crossover leak
>>28588041
Real
Scarlett No.28588599 >>28588647
>>28588493
Ford was indeed the first company to mass produce a wet belt diesel back in 07 or 08. Almost immediately after release they started selling a timing chain retrofit after the real world didn't agree with their lab testing...where fleet services and regular car owners might push an oil change further than the recommended interval. Despite that they started green lighting it in everything they made under 2.3L it seems.
Anonymous No.28588626 >>28588914
>>28588041
The M103 is a strong engine but they have headgasket issues and the electromechanical injection system becomes unreliable at higher mileages.
Anonymous No.28588647 >>28588695
>>28588599
>where fleet services and regular car owners might push an oil change further than the recommended interval.
Whoever the fleet manager is for pushing an oil change out further is a fucking moron.
Average people do average people things, if you want to save $10 a year to risk a $20,000 engine thats on them.
Anonymous No.28588695 >>28588767
>>28588647
HOLY BASED
Stupid consoomers ruining the glorious ford wet timing belt
Anonymous No.28588767
>>28588695
>Intentionally ignoring the entire post
I get it man, its frustrating paying so much money for an expensive machine and a pretty obvious fault, but give it a rest. Nobody here is going to fondle your balls for stating it.
Anonymous No.28588865 >>28599096
>>28588021 (OP)
GM 3800 after you change the lower intake manifold gaskets and install metal coolant elbows. bonus points if you can find the metal upper intake manifold or the supercharger.
Anonymous No.28588900
>>28588535
>5sfe, with the exception of pre 97 graphite head gaskets

my 94 engines cop 12psi of boost no problem
Anonymous No.28588914 >>28589539
>>28588626
gonna be honest i'm not too familiar with merc engines. i just know that the m103 was quite reliable. what would you say would be the merc engine that is bulletproof? om616? or was it the om613 i'm thinking of...
Anonymous No.28588956 >>28588991
>>28588060
I have no experience with the Vulcan but the pushrod Cologne certainly deserves a spot on the list.
Anonymous No.28588962 >>28594387
318
Anonymous No.28588991
>>28588956
Its a good engine. No power, no fuel economy, but it just keeps on chugging.
Anonymous No.28588999 >>28589025 >>28589468
Thoughts on the Volvo T5?
Anonymous No.28589025
>>28588999
any euronigger shit is gay and retarded purely for the gay retarded array of fasteners they use
Anonymous No.28589308 >>28589314 >>28589424
>>28588021 (OP)
Nissan KA24E
Anonymous No.28589314 >>28589324
>>28589308
Based single cam enjoyer
Anonymous No.28589324
>>28589314
Cool, most of my experience with the engine was super high mileage auto parts delivery trucks. I did own a 1989 240, and a 1996 Hardbody. Neither ever had really high miles though.
Anonymous No.28589362 >>28589542
>>28588305
The iron duke had a fiber cam gear too.
The purpose of it was to be a deliberate weak link so if something went wrong the cheap and easy to replace gear failed instead of something expensive.
Anonymous No.28589398 >>28593363 >>28594168
>>28588021 (OP)
We already know which ones are indestructible. Lets clear up the ones that are overrated pieces of shit.

>GM 3800
This piece of shit has never been put into a work vehicle so it doesn't qualify
>Chrysler/Jeep I6
This is a fragile and weak piece of shit that overheats if you look it for too long.

Also on the list is anything that burns excessive amounts of oil. An engine is not "indestructible" if it locks up because you forgot to add oil for the day.
Scarlett No.28589424
>>28589308
I am amazed at how much you can abuse and neglect these things and they still run. I gave my D21 to a relative when it was around 300k miles. Told them it needed a new chain tensioner and guides - they have yet to do it after almost 10 years. The chain rattles at idle and sounds like something is very very broken, but quiets down once you get up above 2000rpm. I keep thinking the chain is going to grind through the upper head water passage and kill it...but who knows when that could happen.
Anonymous No.28589454 >>28589468
>>28588021 (OP)
The Chevy 305 and Ford 302 will run like shit longer than some engines will run at all
Anonymous No.28589456
>>28588021 (OP)
Any american engine platform designed before 1971 will last an entire human lifetime assuming basic adequate maintainence (~stoich combustion, zinc oil, >0 gallons coolant, etc)
Same for pre-turbo jap 4 bangers, some of the v6 engines give a bad name and some of the v8s need timing belts so they're out as an absolute unfortunately
Anonymous No.28589465
>>28588027
Perfection incarnate
>>28588091
The 4 banger was better
Anonymous No.28589467 >>28589483
These are cool
Anonymous No.28589468 >>28589875
mazda F engine, found in many a kia, b series, ford probe turbo, and its diesel derivative

>>28588074
>runs but makes 0 power
into the bin with the 3FE

>>28588054
>>28588079
>v8 powerjoke
junk, 466 is a good answer

>>28588999
>whiteblock
junk, correct answer is redblock

>>28589454
both junk
p No.28589483 >>28589655
>>28589467
the pistons parts will wear unevenly due to gravity
Anonymous No.28589539 >>28589658
>>28588914
om617
Anonymous No.28589542
>>28589362
>The purpose of it was to be a deliberate weak link so if something went wrong the cheap and easy to replace gear failed instead of something expensive.
Thats simply not true, easily proven by the commercial engines (generators, pumps, etc.) having a steel gear. Its to reduce noise.
Anonymous No.28589638
>>28588021 (OP)
Unironically 1994 lancer 1.6 engines
Anonymous No.28589644 >>28589702
>>28588021 (OP)
We've had this tread a few times.
In no particular order
A model T engine, they can be out in a field for decades and as long as they aren't locked up, they'll run. Biggest problem they'll have is stuck valves.
The ford flathead. Same as above.
The chrysler inline six leaning tower of power. They are gutless while guzzling gas but will sound like a sewing machine. Although that's the same for the ford and chevy inline sixes as well. Boring, slow, but reliable.
The chevy smallblock. Another pull it from a field and throw some gas in it and it'll go.
A 12 valve cummins. It takes a lot to kill one.
The CAT 3408 They need some cosby sauce once the rings start getting shit.
The CAT 3306 Worst thing with them is a stuck fuel rail.
Most 90's LS engines. Before they filled them with too many electronics or cylinder deactivation.
Most of the 90's honda and toyota inline 4s. Most of them survived the fags and the feisty years.
Generally though, large displacement low power engines tended to last a long time. I doubt in 50 years we'll be able to pull some turbo inline 3 out of a field and make it run.
Anonymous No.28589655 >>28591007
>>28589483
Gravity provides extra oil lubrication where it is needed
Anonymous No.28589658 >>28589890
>>28589539
>om617
easy million km engine. the non-turbo is absolutely gutless but it will run forever on used fryer oil
Anonymous No.28589672
The 2L Duratec. Not a believer? It survived Chris-chan.
Anonymous No.28589702 >>28589706
>>28589644
Dont forget the volvo redblocks. Was one dude with a volvo 1800 with 3.2 million miles.
Anonymous No.28589706
>>28589702
They did some repairs thoughverbeit
Anonymous No.28589727
1.5L Turbo Ecotec
Anonymous No.28589794
2jz engine no shit
Anonymous No.28589814
>>28588021 (OP)
It's slow as shit but an old port injected K24A engine will outlast the fucking world if there's something resembling oil in it
Anonymous No.28589853 >>28589857
30hp vw
Anonymous No.28589857 >>28589999
>>28589853
Anonymous No.28589875 >>28591199
>>28589468
>runs but makes 0 power
They powered pickup trucks and vans for decades. This is also the indestructible engine thread, benchrace dyno chart threads are down the hall, to the left.
Anonymous No.28589890 >>28591137
>>28589658
supposedly the turbo is even better. It has upgraded internals
Anonymous No.28589999 >>28590001
>>28589857
It did dominate African rallies for a while, raced by absolute privateers lol
Anonymous No.28590001
>>28589999
nice quads
p No.28591007
>>28589655
Gravity causes mass to displace fluid.
Anonymous No.28591137
>>28589890
Yeah the turbo is built beefier and has improved oiling and squirters to keep the pistons cool. It is a great engine.
Anonymous No.28591144
>>28588021 (OP)
Tb4x carburetored
Barra fg1-fgx/terry
Intech 4ltr au2/3
I6t diesel truck engines
Anonymous No.28591197
For me it's the 4.6L 2V
Anonymous No.28591199 >>28591852
>>28589875
tools have to do work, no one cares that you can break your foot kicking it
Anonymous No.28591313 >>28591316
>>28588021 (OP)
GM """LS""" 4.8/5.3/6.0. You could kill them if you really wanted to but you would have to try pretty fucking hard. I've seen them go to over 300k miles with an ungodly amount of engine idle hours in work vans on nothing more than a couple oil changes. Keep in mind those are fleet miles and not Toyota miles.

https://youtu.be/zpH7MnqmV_E?t=112
Anonymous No.28591316 >>28591329
>>28591313
Based LS trucks, you can sludge it up with lack of oil changes and it will still have fine oil pressure.
Anonymous No.28591329 >>28591334
>>28591316
Well at least up until the oil pickup tube o-ring fails and kills your oil pressure. Thankfully these engines don't need a lot of oil pressure to live. The GM acceptable oil pressure spec is like 5psi at idle lol.
Anonymous No.28591333
>>28588021 (OP)
I dunno, but I like my 5VZ-FE and it has a little over 270k miles and I hope to take it beyond 300k.
Anonymous No.28591334
>>28591329
Yeah the workhorse engines don't seemt o need much protection, I noticed Honda K series is like that, if there's a little film of oil left even when the pressure is cutting in and out, the engine doesn't even think about getting damaged.
Anonymous No.28591421 >>28591422 >>28592281
vq35de
Anonymous No.28591422 >>28592281
>>28591421
Based DE, you're a good motor when wetbacks n nigs can't even kill your that fast
Anonymous No.28591852 >>28591856
>>28591199
Which is what the Ford300 did for decades. What are you trying to say?
Anonymous No.28591856 >>28591859
>>28591852
how useful is the world's best steam tractor?
Anonymous No.28591859 >>28591907
>>28591856
If its indestructible (see the thread you're posting in) then very good. Again, this isn't the benchracing thread where you can piss your pants over 25 horsepower differences and lap times.
Anonymous No.28591907 >>28591941
>>28591859
wrong, its useless and irrelevant
Anonymous No.28591941 >>28592282 >>28592436 >>28592842
>>28591907
Yeah, and it'd be really stupid to add boost to an indestructible engine. 600hp isn't much, but knowing you couldn't hurt it would be completely useless.
Anonymous No.28591954 >>28591960 >>28596491
>>28588041
>5sfe

>>28588044
>toyota jz

>>28588123
>Toyota 4afe

Thanks anons for mentioning half of my fleet already. Let me just add the K engine to the list.
Anonymous No.28591960 >>28591962 >>28592099
>>28591954
The other half consists of:
>RB26DETT - works, but not nearly as reliable as the 2JZ-GE
>RD28T - it's an overheating pig, but surprisingly has done 300kkm and still runs fine
>VW Type 1 1300cc - reliable lawnmower engine, mine's in a 1302
>N54 - seems to be reliable too, i've only had it for a year

Also, my 4A is a 4A-GE, super reliable
Anonymous No.28591962
>>28591960
>The other half consists of:
Nobody asked.
Anonymous No.28592071 >>28599082
>>28588022
>really any straight 6 not made by krauts.
You have to beat the fuck out of a BMW M50 to kill it. Probably the most durable I6 of the 90s.
Scarlett No.28592099 >>28592271
>>28591960
I'm really glad I did not get the RD28 in my car. Everything online seems to indicate its gutless and would overheat in traffic. The option to run strained WVO seemed appealing, but the internet seems convinced it will warp the block and heads if you look at it wrong. So far the vq30det I got instead has been reliable thankfully.
Anonymous No.28592271
>>28592099
Mine's in a Y60 Patrol, poor thing does want to overheat. On long and steep inclines I have to take breaks to cool down. I'll be adding cooling to the car to make it useful. There are engine mods that increase water flow and such to get the sixth cylinder a little better cooling.

It being a Turbodiesel gives it plenty of torque to move the heavy car, top speed is above what's a safe speed with that suspension. Heat soak with the turbo without intercooler is real.
Anonymous No.28592273
>>28588021 (OP)
Owned two, exploded both.
Anonymous No.28592281
>>28591421
>>28591422
*randomly decides to burn a shitload of oil in your path*
Anonymous No.28592282 >>28592332 >>28592436
>>28591941
Weird harmonics in crank. 302 v8 better option.
Anonymous No.28592332
>>28592282
>302 v8 better option.
Not as indestructible as the legendary 300 buzzin half dozen. I6's are just more interesting than a V6 or old V8.
Anonymous No.28592436 >>28592440
>>28591941
Ah yes that completely custom thing some guy spent years making really represents production units

>>28592282
Can just use a 240 crank or have a 7k stall converter like the atlas/barra people
Anonymous No.28592440 >>28592561
>>28592436
>Ah yes that completely custom thing some guy spent years making really represents production units
Except production units are very well known to basically be indestructible. Are you still confused what this thread topic is?
Anonymous No.28592466 >>28592481
>>28588036
>1st diesel was 7th reply
>Not a single reply
Is /o/ that smooth brained?
Anonymous No.28592481 >>28592495
>>28592466
We don’t have many diesel cars in America, but you just reminded me of a very durable one we have. Mercedes OM617.
Anonymous No.28592495 >>28592543
>>28592481
Based 617, so fuckin torquey for a 123HP turbo
Anonymous No.28592543
>>28592495
nah nah nah
natural aspirated diesels are psychic. [spoiler]they are great for boat engine conversions[/spoiler]
Anonymous No.28592561 >>28592564
>>28592440
you're the one pushing intellectual honesty negro
Anonymous No.28592564
>>28592561
Of claiming the Ford 300 is a nearly indestructible engine in the indestructible engine thread?
Anonymous No.28592842 >>28593312
>>28591941
>the virgin custom pushrod head
vs
>the Chad just make it OHC ya farken dickhead
Anonymous No.28593312 >>28594010
>>28592842
The really tiny exhaust ports tell me this is stock, but I see a sbf bell pattern and 5 freeze plugs... Is this a 170 or something?
Anonymous No.28593354
>>28588021 (OP)
EJ22E
Anonymous No.28593363
>>28589398
>GM 3800
>This piece of shit has never been put into a work vehicle
wrong
Anonymous No.28593373 >>28601524
>>28588057
>1.9 TDI
Haha, my dad still has one of those in his Audi grocery getter. When he takes it to my EU cunt's mandatory vehicle inspection, the inspectors laugh at the engine being basically new (it's almost 20 years old)
The rest of the car isn't in bad condition either, though the dashboard has started creaking a bit. Drives about as well as a new Toyota, in other words much better than a Tesla or a BYD.
Anonymous No.28593648 >>28593727
>>28588074
I am one of 3 people in recorded that has killed a Ford 300c.i.
Anonymous No.28593652
What's in Anon's uplander?
Anonymous No.28593653
Any of the GMT800 engines
Anonymous No.28593717
>>28588021 (OP)
UZAM 412
Anonymous No.28593727
>>28593648
Howd you do it? cash4clunkers silicate? Crushing the truck while it was running? Did you suggest it should profit shareholders first?
Anonymous No.28594010
>>28593312
farken AU intech m8
Don't know why you drongos are so keen to fuck around with pushrods
Anonymous No.28594044
>>28588021 (OP)
"Indestructible" is an absolute.
Something can't be more indestructible than something else.
It indicates something either can or can't be destroyed.
Anonymous No.28594168 >>28594170 >>28594314
>>28589398
>Lets clear up the ones that are overrated pieces of shit.

The SBC 350.

Popular because they made a gorillion of them and put them in everything.
Parts are cheap, because there are a gorillion of them that need parts. Cheap in junkyards because there are a gorillion of them, Aftermarket is packet with cheap options because there are a gorillion of them.

Everybody has a story about their dad's roommate's uncle that went 400k miles, but when you make 10 million of them standard deviation says a few will have impressive runs,.

The most reliable thing about them is how cheap they are at the junkyard and how quick they are to swap out because it's the 3rd one they've done this week, and they've been doing it for 30 years.
Anonymous No.28594170
>>28594168
they are anemic junk. just like the hemi. just like the 460 and 454 and every other american anemic pig engine boomers get a hard on for.
Anonymous No.28594302
>>28588116
hello, lumfriend
Anonymous No.28594311 >>28594336 >>28597026
The Ford 6.7 Powerstroke
Commonly runs 400-500k miles, occasionally twice that, actually has enough power to pull a wet spaghetti noodle out of a cat’s ass unlike your 5.9 Cummins or 7.3 PS
>muh cp4
Don’t put DEF or gas in your fuel and change the damn filters, run a little EDT
>muh DPF
Either use it like a truck or delete it

Best light duty truck diesel ever made
Anonymous No.28594314
>>28594168
the SBC is so cheap and ubiquitous it transcends reality
It becomes indestructible by virtue of costing the same for a full rebuild as other lesser motors cost for an oil change
Anonymous No.28594336
>>28594311
So reliable it killed Bill Hewitt from repairing it
Anonymous No.28594387
>>28588962

I got a free 1998 dodge dakota with a 318. The engine runs pretty good and sounds badass out the exhaust pipe

Every once in a while it will kinda cut out a little bit and skip/misfire within the first 2 minutes of a cold start. It never does to when it's warm
Anonymous No.28595964 >>28595970 >>28596055
Yall think in the future the new tacoma turbo charged engines will make the list in these types of threads?
Anonymous No.28595970
>>28595964
Probably not, Yota has been having problems with Tundras under warranty needing cylinder head off work, these are nightmares.
Anonymous No.28596055 >>28596473
>>28595964
toyotas reputation is solely based on 90s models, its completely undeserved today
Anonymous No.28596473
>>28596055
*ahem* Toyota made cars in the 80s too buddy
Anonymous No.28596491 >>28597020
>>28591954
>>5sfe
Why this and not the 3S-GE? I'm genuinely asking.
Anonymous No.28597020
>>28596491
Less revs last longer it's as simple as that.
But I personally went with the blanket mention of ALL S motors >>28588091
Anonymous No.28597026
>>28594311
The 6.7 really is a very good motor. Should be placed up with the greats like the ones you mentioned.
Anonymous No.28597049
Is GM's LZ4 a good engine
Owner-Optimus Not Primefag !hoSMSS3fmY No.28597057 >>28598787
3L Vulcan V6 Ford

Was literally designed to run for a half hour with no coolant

Pic related, did this for 4 miles straight flat-out with those miles on it.
Anonymous No.28598764 >>28601532
>>28588021 (OP)
TB48DE
Anonymous No.28598787
>>28597057
Hell yeah, brother. It's a great engine. But you DO keep a spare cam synchronizer, right? I hear that little gear wears out also drives the oil pump.
Anonymous No.28598815
>>28588036
THAT’S MY GOAT
Anonymous No.28599082
>>28592071
M103 2.6L Mercedes-Benz I6
Anonymous No.28599096
>>28588865
Don't forget to mention the transmission usually paired with it, Masterpieces like it are rare.
Anonymous No.28599106
>>28588021 (OP)
Every 1st gen Chevy engine
Anonymous No.28601524
>>28593373
how many km if i may ask?
Anonymous No.28601526
>>28588123
>Toyota L diesel
Those are not that good.
Anonymous No.28601532
>>28598764
those forklift/industrial engines with flowy heads does not count, same goes for 1FZ-FE