Thread 28662691

Is the Volvo 960 a good car? Would it be a bad idea to daily drive one?

Euroniggers do weird shit with their engines....
It will have weird fasteners like torx and shit, I'm pretty sure it's got a weird cam cover which is also the top half of the cam journals, it's got a weird crank pulley...

Volvo engines are too weird for me.

>>28662691 (OP)
slow as fuck, shitty mpg (my bro has one and no matter what he can't get above 18mpg), brown interior plastics crack from simple windblow

engines and gearboxes reliable thou

>headlight wipers
what the fuck was the point of these again

>>28662703
to wipe your headlights

>>28662691 (OP)
Avoid. Shitty suspension, problematic v6. If you want a comfy rwd volvo, go for the 940/740, whichever you can find.

>>28662740
>problematic v6
>v6

>>28662696
>weird fasteners like torx and shit
Oh, the horror! For fuck's sake.

>>28662747
Oh, okay, it's the inline six? Anyway, they are known for being shit. Stick the the good old redblock, yeah.

>>28662759
I had a high miles 850r and it was fine. Too bad the six didn't get a turbo

>>28662759
Yes tell us all about the engine which you don't even know if it's i6 or V6
I'm sure you're a real expert on it

>>28662757
My engine works just fine with all hex head bolts, I don't understand why Euroniggers think it's good idea to build and engine with 4 different patterns of fastener

>>28662837
I trust him more than you

>>28662691 (OP)
I had a similar ‘85 volvo. It was a good car. Shit out after 300k miles.

>>28662740
>>28662759
my buddy has i6 and had zero problems with engine

gtfo you retard

I don’t think I’d daily a European car that old, but if you have a backup car it’s probably fine.

>>28662699
OP here. Would a 940 turbo be any better?

I guess the guy meant the PRV V6 that was apparently used in 91 and 92 models.

>>28662831
850 is an entirely different car ya dingus