>>28697344
I don't think so. The base models might break into that range but they were essentially unobtainable the first my so it'd take a lot of searching. All the ones I saw when I looked at my raptor were mid to low 30s.
>you need more
Yep just add two more doors for le wife and kids >but that means youre just a larper
Don't care lmao, i will NEVER use it off road, i just want a car that looks cool
>>28697280 (OP)
YES YOU COMMIE PIECE OF SHIT
I NEED A CADILLAC ESCALADE ESV WITH A 700HP SUPERCHARGED V8 AND 24INCH RIMS
ANYTHING LESS THAN THAT AND YOU'RE NOT A MAN, YOU'RE A BUG IN A POD
LEFTISTS HATE ME
POLAR BEARS FEAR ME
I WANT TO RIDE IN A GIANT OF METAL, FILLED WITH THE HIDES OF DEAD ANIMALS AND WOOD FROM ENDANGERED TREES, CONSUMING ENOUGH DEAD DINOSAUR JUICE PER MILE TO POWER AN INDIAN VILLAGE FOR A MONTH.
>>28699125
The original Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) for a base 1966 Ford Bronco ranged from approximately $2,194 to $2,625, depending on the body style. A base utility wagon had an MSRP of around $2,480, while the open-body roadster had the lowest starting price at approximately $2,194, and the half-cab pickup was priced at about $2,480. ($19,746 to $22,320 in 2025 dollars - inflation sure is a bitch)