>>28700188 (OP) >>28700497 >>28700506
The Japanese are such stubborn assholes and refuse to use a fast, modern auto in any of their budget sports cars.
>>28700515
They throw away their cars after 7 years because the registration tax on them increases a lot at that point as an incentive to keep people buying new cars. Conveniently, that's right about how long a Jatco CVT lasts.
>>28700497
Surprisingly while Subaru's CVTs are still shit, it's not actually the CVT belt/cones part that fails the most often. It's their valve bodies failing instead.
>>28700497
Yeah it's called the SPT "Subaru performance transmission" Lol.
I heard it's not bad for a cvt
DESU if your car even has a CVT option it means your shitbox doesnt produce enough torque to make CVTs not viable lol.
>>28701093 >DESU if your car even has a CVT option it means your shitbox doesnt produce enough torque to make CVTs not viable lol. >he doesn't know about v6 altimas with jatco cvts
>>28701075
Imagine being so mindbroken that someone doesn't want to own an ancient POS manual transmission like a boomer that you project that no, actually, YOU are the boomer for wanting a fast, modern automatic transmission. You're legit fucking retarded.
>>28701200
because youre low iq
i said if a car has a reliable CVT option then it doesn't produce enough torque
that doesn't mean cars that have low torque torque have reliable CVT options
the equivalent statement to what i said is that if a car produces a lot of torque it has no reliable CVT option