Thread 28700452

this upbadged tragimatic-only poser audi is one of the most overhyped vehicles of all time and I'm tired of pretending it's not

>>28700452 (OP)
Brave and stunning opinion

>>28700452 (OP)
I like Gallardo much more because this new blob is already among cars that don't have a good balance between having good tech and being simple/raw anymore.

>>28700472
The Gallardo is timeless.

>>28700472
The pre-facelift Gallardo was one of the last Lamborghinis before the company went full on with the soulless new money douche aesthetic. Now Lamborghini just churns out oceans of dentist's-office-white-on-black-wheels leasebait for clout chasers

>hyped
Not really, its just easily accessible.

Its a fine entry level sports car, it just suffers from Dodge Demon syndrome where its so accessible that poors lean into them and damage the brand.

This is why I side with Ferrari when controling who buys your cars has actual consequences for your image.

>>28700478
...no

>>28700906
Lamborghini has always been the alternative, for new money. The outrageousness is the appeal for them.

>>28700472
>>28700478
>>28700906
The Gallardo is trash.
Its a piece of shit that was bought by people to say they owned a Lamborghini when they couldnt afford a real Lamborghini.

I worked with exotics and have driven aventadors, 458s, 911 turbos etc and the Gallardo is a joke.

Ferrari:
>nooo, you have to buy 7 used californias before you get a chance to buy a new entry level model, and don't even think about modifying it!
Lambo:
>oh you want our cool looking car? sure bro, no problem, remember to step on it, we made sure it sounds great
I think I know who I like better

>>28701049
Having never driven any exotic cars, I assume people like it for the engine and general performance. You could argue it's more of an enthusiast car since people modify them into some crazy machines quite often for racing while something like aventador you mentioned stays it's whole life being babied around on regular roads, and same for the 458 besides some more official racing events. Won't argue about 911s on the other hand. So what is it that makes Gallardos trash, if you mean anything besides VAG quality for parts?

>>28701073
Just LMAO, it's as if you don't actually own the Ferrari but rent it from them instead.

>>28700927
>entry level sports car
>you need to be a millionaire to afford it
I don't know if this is a Rule 2 issue or some people really live in (gold-plated, Tai Lopez Lamborghini account) ivory towers.

>>28700472
Not
A
Real
Lambo

NARL and never will be

>>28701551
So you're trying to claim 21st century has no real Lambos? Well whatever, I get what you're saying. People love this car for what it offers and not even the badge as much sometimes, just look at the crazy drag cars that were built with Gallardo as the base. That's insane amount of money to drop on something that no longer has a lot of normalfag appeal to it.

>>28701591
Its a poorfag version, so a NARL.
Same as all 1/2 series bmw are NARBs
And all boxmen are NARPs, as weel as a hundred other NARPs

Also, its a used car, which makes it the automotive equivalent of wearing thrift store used clothes (rags)

>>28701591
Gallardo has "normal" doors.
Pics of it with "scissor" doors are all aftermarket kits.
Imagine buying a Lambo that doesnt have Lambo doors.
Thus was done on purpose, to make it cheaper and appeal to normies.

Here's a pic of a Gallardo interior.

>>28701682
Here's an aventador interior.

>>28701682
>Imagine buying a Lambo that doesnt have Lambo doors.

>>28701714
Thats like posting a Model T wheel with wooden spokes.

Butterfly doors became the lamborghini trademark.
You dont think of bicycles when I say Lamborghini.

>>28701764
Goalposts moved unsuccessfully

>>28701714
NARL

>>28701658
It's narb and narp; you don't spell it L.A.S.E.R. do you, L.O.L.?

>>28701854
I was right, i bet you say "ATM machine" lol.

>>28701858
Right about what; that was my firat post in this thread narbledash

>>28701767
How many lamborghini models have been manufactured without butterfly doors since the countach?

>>28701682
>>28701684
At least compare Gallardo with Murcielago instead of a much newer car if you're trying to make a point regarding interiors. But even with the parts bin stuff going on there I like it more than the Aventador. No glossy plastic, has analog dash, and it doesn't look like it belongs next to a gaming keyboard for a PC. LMAO at the absolute state of nu-cars.

>>28701551
Cringe.

>>28701049
>aventador
Is that a good vehicle (for what it's trying to achieve)? Know someone who has it down as a dream car.

>>28701908
Murcielago is actually.my favorite Lamborghini.
Pic is the interior (well, one of the updated versions but its same time frame as the gallardo Pic i posted).
The aventador was available at the same.time as gallardos.

>>28701943
If you want min/max stats on paper, there are better alternatives.
But it feels like what you'd expect a supercar to feel like- unlike a GT3 thats just another 911 with a temu interior.

>>28701890
How many goalposts are you going to move?