Thread 4420228 - /p/ [Archived: 764 hours ago]

Anonymous
4/5/2025, 10:39:40 AM No.4420228
2000s4
2000s4
md5: 6f75b0a8c69e513c50a929f84564d339🔍
in around 2004-2011 there was this awkward period between film cameras and smartphones, how well is you life documented from that era?
Replies: >>4420235 >>4422741 >>4422756 >>4422777 >>4422861 >>4426015 >>4433191 >>4433228
Anonymous
4/5/2025, 10:40:13 AM No.4420229
>how well is you life documented from that era
*how well is your life documented from that era
Replies: >>4420232
Anonymous
4/5/2025, 10:58:03 AM No.4420232
>>4420229
What does the asterisk mean?
Replies: >>4420235 >>4420389
Anonymous
4/5/2025, 11:01:06 AM No.4420235
>>4420228 (OP)
It's not documented, all of those photos were on myspace with no backups. I lost it all, which is on one hand, kinda sad that my high high school memories has been lost. But on the other hand, maybe it's better this way.

>>4420232
It's means a correction to the spelling and/or grammar.
Anonymous
4/5/2025, 8:33:48 PM No.4420389
>>4420232
did you get on the internet yesterday or something
Anonymous
4/27/2025, 9:53:59 AM No.4422741
>>4420228 (OP)
nothing
zero

I take photos only out of artistic interest. I don't even have pics of family in my home. I never really think of myself as an entity at all and have no identity than the random interests I case.
Anonymous
4/27/2025, 1:00:52 PM No.4422756
>>4420228 (OP)
They were still developing film at the shopping centre in buttfuck, regional Queensland past that point and decent phone cameras definitely existed earlier than that as well. By decent I don't mean as good as good film in a good SLR but they were decent enough. Maybe you are a zoomer or something but I can assure you there was an overlap and film didn't completely die until phones were already pretty good.
>implying it's actually dead
Close enough.
Anonymous
4/27/2025, 3:19:51 PM No.4422777
>>4420228 (OP)
clannad fucking sucks faggot
Anonymous
4/27/2025, 8:58:16 PM No.4422861
>>4420228 (OP)
the only documentation of my life is from that period in question, all taken on a Sony W35 and samsung Fino 30SE
Anonymous
4/27/2025, 9:02:33 PM No.4422864
We had cheapo digishits or Nikon D40s if you were fancy. The big issue is losing the files, I only have a few pics left, but people were snapping just as much as they were with disposables.
Anonymous
5/9/2025, 9:19:40 PM No.4426015
>>4420228 (OP)
Still have some nightmarishly detailed digital family portraits from the mid 00s stashed away somewhere
Anonymous
6/6/2025, 7:35:06 PM No.4433191
>>4420228 (OP)
pretty good by 2011
pre-2009: kodak point & shoot
2009: D60, X-700, started working in a camera shop
2010: D90, FM10, started doing senior portraits and some music events
2011: D2h, F100
might have some files on old drives from that era, but most of my digital i have easy access to is 2015 onwards
should have some boxes of most the negs though, film was like 2.50-3.50 a roll, maybe 5 for portra, and then $1 for me to machine dev and scan at work
Anonymous
6/6/2025, 10:52:57 PM No.4433228
>>4420228 (OP)
I remember there was still local film development up until like 2014-2015-ish.

But by this point, you'd have to wait 2-3 weeks since it was not done in-house, they sent it out to somewhere. It was also not cheap. About the same prices you'd pay today for dev+print. The local walmart and other grocery stores did it this way.