>has identical images/iso performance to D3
>decent video/mic
>bitrate can be increased to 65 mbps via update which also grants manual shutter control when filming

>for less than 50$

https://youtu.be/Yss_YIjDhQk?si=sJe2b6l0PdzWAMCx

lens is nikkor zoom 43-86 f3.5-22 1979 MC which I got for 30$

>>4429053 (OP)
here comes another chinese earthquake brbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbr

>>4429055
1: parked car, boring 2: too much HDR
3: wow its a leaf, 4: underexposed, sky too dark, shutter speed too fast water looks like shit
5: bokeh flower 6: bokeh flower 7: missed focus, bird sniffing its farts

>>4429055
How can you truly understand the IQ of your camera without a dog pic?

>>4429055
rule #1 of photography : never shoots rocks and leaves.

>>4429088
Rule #1 of /p/: Rocks and leaves are fair game because I'm not posting my family or personally identifiable locations/things to a Belarusian Gulag Interior Design website.

>>4429095
Nah you're meant to get into godawful boring photography you dont enjoy (like building corners and "street") and only a (((nepotism beneficiary))) could succeed doing because it's safe and appropriate to post a constant content stream of it to the internet

Either that or you spend $3000 on m43 gear to post a bunch of bird pics no one cares about because they're at least good for content streams

>>4429107
>nophoto mad about photos

>>4429210
/p/ made me momentarily quit photography because of how soulless taking photos to post here feels.

now i only take photos for myself and have almost nothing that can go on /p/. maybe i should start taking a bunch of random bullshit pics of my dog? even the landscapes, i've already shown my gf, my mom, my sister, my brother, and both my best friends, in group texts. i cant post shit here.

i could if i did photowalks i fucking hate and took a bunch of shitty pictures of retirees neglected houses but holy fucking shit does doing anything in life to be a "good poster" on an anonymous furry porn site suck the joy out of everything. no wonder everyone just posts their dog instead of the 3 guys with 0 friends.

>>4429217
it's not that deep bro

>>4429218
everything is deep bro

try having a girlfriend who isnt a hipster art ho, who still likes photography. i need full frame bro. because she really cares about her eyebrow definition when shot with very dim window light. i just want a pocketable aps-c, but she literally demands bokeh, and has a problem with me having more than one camera because "durr you're the only income right now"

i'm going to have to just start taking pictures of other peoples cats or something i have nothing

>>4429217
I've only posted pictures here that I took for myself. I would like to see more like that. It doesn't have to be so complicated

>>4429053 (OP)
>le lowercase "vibes" street garbage

>>4429219
>honey
>its time for our 4 o clock bokeh session
>show me that 85mm f1.2, big boy~

>I just want an x100vi

>>4429219
>try having a girlfriend
Tried that, they made life miserable. Perpetual shoppers, demands and expectations of everyone else, bc everything and everyone in the world is an object for them to judge as worthy of their acquisition. Total psychopathy. No thanks anon, all yours, more for you to live with …for the rest of your life.

>>4429053 (OP)
D3 is full frame, this is not.

>>4429066
>1: parked car
Brainlet take, NGMI

>>4429107
Lmfao it’s that guy that was gangraped by a group of mft cameras and now won’t stfu about it even years later hahaha

>>4429217
Why can't you post them here?

>>4429321
Why would you want to prove to eternity that you post on 4chan?

>>4429356
Who gives a fuck?

>>4429356
I wouldn't, but it's real easy to post photos that don't do that

>>4429375
>everything good you shoot is shown to the people that matter if you have a life
>cant dox yourself as a proud user of the nazi furry mass shooter imageboard or you’ll get canceled
>/p/ - rocks, leaves, dogs, and cats, the latter two are so sketch someone doxed the husky guy i think
>backs of heads and parked cars if they live downtown
fundamentally the best 4chan posters are those with no friends

like burt and sugar

>>4429377
cope more nophoto

I've had both. The only pros are that the D3100 does very basic 1080 video if you need it.

It only does 12bit raw though. I traded it for a New Belgium Brewery Fat Tire bike. The bike went up in value, while the camera is nearly worthless now.

>>4429053 (OP)

anyone with recent raw from D3000?

>>4429088

shut up

>>4429053 (OP)
Why would you not just get a 5d mark ii if you want a cheap camera? Its full frame and it can do raw video too. There's a billion of them and they're unbelievably cheap.

>>4429066
topkek

It is fascinating just how much use you can get out of a decade old aps-c costing next to nothing. In my region the market is saturated with them to the point that the local classifieds have many models listed for half the going rate on ebay. I have acquired a stack of them just because I wanted lenses and other gear they came bundled with. They may not be "cool", but with the right knowledge about their limitations they can still take excellent photos. Cheapskates are spoiled when it comes to options these days. I don't get why the zoomers who want that flash look don't touch them still, maybe they are intimidating.

>>4435926
Its because tech shmech, if you don't want to carry a camera with you, it's only good as a paperweight. Big DSLR blobs just aren't fashionable. The companies designed them with market stratification in mind and made them ugly on purpose to make it visually obvious they were exclusive to professionals and outdoorsmen.

>>4429053 (OP)
D3100 is still an excellent camera, anon

>>4429356
Because I'm not ashamed of myself?