Are there any other Youtubers who tear down other Youtubers?

He make a great point about the biggest "photography" channels being all gear based while others either sell luts or courses about dragging the saturation slider in lightroom. Actual photography based channels are usually not very popular with the algorithm as they don't sell as much product. Simon D'entremont is pretty helpful though.

>award winning pro photographer
Let's see his pics

>>4433546
https://migsfoto.com/
typical overedited industry stock photography shit imo

>>4433607
based i aspire to be this someday

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeLi3Iujbow
holy based

>>4433607
Absolute shit lmao
I'm guessing the guy calling him based is the channel itself

>>4433607
If I had to take pics like that as a job I would quickly statt hating photography. I guess it is a little better than weddings...

>>4433607
is this ai?

https://youtu.be/8HAnB_KS_D8
This shit is hilarious man, he spents like 13 minutes talking about light and reflectors and angles and shit and picrel is the end product. What a fucking hack.

>>4439649
A hack getting paid work and perks from international cachet brands, seems like he’s doing alright if you ask me.
>inb4 “that’s not real photography!!” Or whatever malding cope

>>4439649
photography lets people with no artistic talent and no real dedication to art produce art quality end results

if only such a nice camera were given to a talented person like doghair or zach

>>4439653
guys I found him

>>4433531
I don’t get it. Why does the algorithm care whether the channel is selling stuff or not?

>>4439655
SLRs were a mistake you should only be able to shoot large format

>>4433607
wow this is terrible
incredible work

>>4441192
https://www.instagram.com/p/CaSIU64ptxG

>>4441200
its diabolical the way some "professional" photographers can take $10,000 150mp cameras and create tasteless stuff that looks like it was poorly shot on a shitty disposable digital camera from 2007 and claim its their vision

>>4439728
It's not the algorithm problem per se, it's the taste of the algo consumer itself. People want to take better photos, they-choose they easiest path, which is buy gear instead of investing in betterring oneself. I buy better camera I take pro pictures... Therefore algo pushes camera reviews intead of framing lighting pictures