I want that retro film feel that turns head without the headache of viewfinders with manual focus and development/scanning. Is refurbishing the inside with digital the way to go?

>>4436423 (OP)
Just transition already, this is stupid

>>4436423 (OP)
>plastic temu junk
If you care so much about looks, why not wear a "retro" camera as an accessory

Instead of doing the wendigo equivalent of puppeteering a gutted corpse

>>4436423 (OP)
>le retro
I feel so happy that film and analogue cameras have finally went mainstream and are becoming more and more expensive. It's great to know that some toddlers are wasting gaint money on these retro toys. Normalfags have single handedly made film extremely expensive and cliche. That's quite an achievement honestly.

No, all of the film or retro looking shit in the world won't make your photography good. Study, practice and "right tools for the right job" always werks.

If you have problem with the viewfinder then just use screen.

>>4436436
>calls others normalfags
>reddit spacing
mirror.jpg

>>4436442
I am not normal. Several women were interested in me but when they approached me I gave them "the ick". I have spent the peak years of youth(17-25) on 4chan. I am anything but normal.

>>4436423 (OP)
That's not a real tlr anon

>>4436429
>puppeteering a gutted corpse
You know they're not recyling TLRs for this? They're miniature plastic bodies made in China

>>4436697
>is refurbishing the inside with digital the way to go?
op might be stupid enough to think otherwise

>>4436702
In theory you could put a sensor and electronics in the space where film is supposed to go

>>4436711
Yeah a few people have thought of doing that before. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_camera

>>4436711
Have you actually held a film camera before? They're way smaller than digital cameras

>>4436744
He’s not a kinok like you and me

>>4436744
TLRs are kinda big