>>4437452
Not level, uneven development, subject isn't centred but this is slightly more subjective, film isn't flat for your scan/print
>>4437456
the chest area of the statue is the only correctly exposed/developed part
>>4437458
straightest shot in the whole set, and still off slightly, it's harder without modern camera grids but yeah gotta work at it, same dev issues as others, and flat scans are key man, or else your focus falls out
>>4437460
under exposed a stop and a half, lacking any critical detail, arguably too open on the aperture, no real focal point besides the canon logo
>>4437459
youve got some grit or dirt in your dev that's stained the image bottom left, best exposure of the batch, but focus is on the tip of the nose not the eyes, also not straight. be careful including lines etc in your background, it stands out more than you realise when it's not level.
Overall, the issues with level/straight lines is more of intentionality, none of them look deliberate, so it comes across as sloppy in that sense. A lot of your images have the same lean with the left drooping by the way, so work on correcting that in your shooting posture. Focus on your compositions more as well, make stuff centred instead of just eyeballing it and firing it, think about balance, how heavier shadows in one part of the image might overpower your midtones nearby etc.
Be gentle with your film while loading it, take your time, crumpling it is really no bueno. I'm assuming you have a paterson tank, so what i'd do is next roll you finish developing that you don't like, keep aside and don't trim, then you can practice loading it in daylight and see why you might be forcing the film too much.
My guess with your second roll was the water was too warm so your dev worked too fast, but just a guess.When flat scanning, if you don't have a good holder, or you're zooming in on a contact sheet, put some glass on top to at least get it flat-ish
Keep it going lad, improvement is time + effort
