>2025
>still no cameras with native or built in 4:5 aspect ratio

>>4444526 (OP)
A quick search and you wouldve found this you subhuman byzantine mut:

>Fujifilm GFX Series (Medium Format)
The Fujifilm GFX 50S, 50R, and 100 cameras have a dedicated 5:4 aspect ratio mode, which is functionally equivalent to 4:5, and can be selected directly in the camera’s menu. The GFX system also offers other aspect ratios like 4:3, 3:2, 1:1, and more.

>Nikon DSLRs and Mirrorless
Nikon D850, D810, Z7, Z6, D800, and D800E support 4:5 aspect ratio crop modes in-camera, in addition to other ratios like 1:1 and 3:2.

>Canon DSLRs and Mirrorless
Canon 5DS, 5DS R, 5D Mark IV, and several EOS models (including some with the "smart viewfinder" and Live View) offer 4:5 aspect ratio crop modes.

>Olympus (OM System)
Some Olympus cameras, such as the E-5, provide a variety of aspect ratios, including 5:4 (4:5), selectable in the camera menu.

>>4444550
DAMN
I fucking kneel. Thank you anon

But why there are no 4:5 sensors?

>>4444526 (OP)
>I don’t know how to process my photos
>or am too fucking lazy and want the cameras engineers to do it for me
>bc I want every photo I ever shoot to be the same aspect ratio determined by a number
>not proportioned according the the subject matter in the composition.

I aM a PhOtOgRaPhEr, me real gud artiste
Derp

>>4444552
>But why there are no 4:5 sensors?

More left over wafer than 3:2 ratio.

The same reason for why today there is almost no 16:10 ratio monitor panel produced compare to 16:9.
Because you can make 2 16:9 panels from a wafer when just one 16:10 panel can be made from a wafer.

fuck you 16:9 faggots. monitor should be 16:10.
I knew this was gonna happening when they pushing muh
>sir 16:9 monitor has no letterbox when you watch movie sir. i highly recommend you 16:9 if you use it for entertainment or websurfing. 16:10 is an old monitor ratio lol.
The thing is for most of task 16:9 has just too narrow top and bottom.

>>4444588
>You need to spend hours editing every individual photo with your Adobe subscription software... because you just have to okay!!!

>>4444599
>adodidobi
Fucking iToddlers

>>4444526 (OP)
git gud

>>4444599
>what, actually develop my film?
>actually develop my RAWs?
Yeah what a waste of time, when all you really want to do is machine gun low effort low quality snapshit diarrhea no one has any reason to look at.

>But wouldn’t that take a $1000 adoobie subscription?
Are you actually this retarded irl?

Just shoot with your fuckin cellphone, it’ll give you better insta trash than an unprocessed raw file. Sensor aspect ratio is the least of your problems.

>>4444605
Maybe anon should get a GFX 50RF for the dedicated aspect ratio dial and shoot in jpeg with film simoooolations

>>4444588
>i'll fix it in post
Fuck off. All of the photographers that i like shot in 4x5 or 8x10. Only hobbyist retards keep experimenting like a 16 years boys. We all played with aspect ratios when we were 16. After shooting for more than a decade you know your likes and dislikes. Now I want to focus on subject matter and what I want to say after imposing certain aesthetic limits.

I want to make tightest composition in my viewfinder. In post I only care about toning and color correction.

>>4444604
Motherfucker I wish. But I can't afford this shit.