Welcome to the photography world anon.
Your indoor shots are borked because you've both missed focus and underexposed significantly. Shooting outdoors is way more forgiving because film has decent exposure latitude when there is a lot of light available, but for indoor your going to open the aperture and focus.
even if a room seems well lit, in reality the difference in the amount of lights well exposed is orders of less than what you see outside. try downloading a light metering app on your phone to try and get you into the ball park of a proper exposure. also note that negative film is typically very forgiving for overexposing, but really doesnt handle underexposing. so that also hurts you.
your camera is a rangefinder, meaning there is a coupled element used for focusing (unlike SLRs which are wysiwyg) so its also possible that could be off. if you want to go further it may not be a bad idea to send your camera off for a CLA. its an old ass camera, every part of it probably needs it. focusing, shutter, etc.
as far as the shots go, indoor shots arent usable. the outdoor shots have a nice slice of life aspect to them. they are mostly snapshots but I do like this one.
>>4446520 I'd prefer if you had hit the building a bit more straight on and centered it a bit more. if youre going to shoot another roll, take like 60 seconds to assess shots like this about where your subject is and where you are in relation to it (not only where your feet are but the vertical position of the camera).
Also when you get scans back, you can still edit them. For example the barn picture needs a slight straightening.
I'm guessing you only got 29 frames because some of your shots may have been so under exposed that nothing actually got developed.
>>4446530Cute pic, but im not sure about the scuzz. make sure any degraded light seals or foam bits are loose in the camera.
