Thread 4452060 - /p/

Anonymous
7/24/2025, 11:04:55 PM No.4452060
file
file
md5: aa6047a5122b9f1cb35e8d1d80530a9b🔍
Why do we hate him so bad?
Replies: >>4452061 >>4452062 >>4452064 >>4452065 >>4452172
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 11:12:36 PM No.4452061
>>4452060 (OP)
Because he is honest
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 11:18:16 PM No.4452062
>>4452060 (OP)
Ken rockwell btfos most of the posters on p and they are incredibly jealous of him and the growth his family has experienced.
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 11:41:39 PM No.4452063
R6KR0698-sunset-walker-lake
R6KR0698-sunset-walker-lake
md5: cfd119811a30596e8e79e80e55c748ec🔍
He's living proof a bad enough photographer can in fact make a $3199 canon R5 look like an iphone

He's on the record saying the Z8 wasn't good enough for him.
Replies: >>4452066
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 11:44:55 PM No.4452064
>>4452060 (OP)
did the last thread's discussion not satisfy your curiosity?
https://archived.moe/p/thread/4416240/#4416240
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 11:51:22 PM No.4452065
>>4452060 (OP)
You will only get cope from the kenlets.
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 12:01:35 AM No.4452066
>>4452063
Just imagine how bad it would've looked on an RP though
>Z8 wasn't good enough for him
Yup, he went from
>D40 is the greatest consumer camera ever and worth taking over anything else even for his own travels
>Nikon isn't worth owning anymore because the full area subject tracking is only 90% instead of Canony's 97-99%
Replies: >>4452069 >>4452188
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 12:08:07 AM No.4452069
>>4452066
And then one firmware update and $13,000 out of ken's bank account later, nikon got it to 97%
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 12:10:52 AM No.4452070
Screenshot 2025-07-24 151023
Screenshot 2025-07-24 151023
md5: 8c6dbab92be95efbdad457b408c3198d🔍
Z5II is the new D40
Replies: >>4452071 >>4452072
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 12:13:46 AM No.4452071
Screenshot 2025-07-24 151207
Screenshot 2025-07-24 151207
md5: 758efcf4037350849d5feb9c86521d6a🔍
>>4452070
oh no
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 12:14:10 AM No.4452072
>>4452070
Gearfags are going to be so fucking mad when nikon updates the z6ii/z7ii firmware and improves the AF issues lol
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 12:21:52 AM No.4452074
I have no idea about anything and of this guy in particular, but the pictures he posts are so vomit inducing its unreal. like im not sure hes not doing that on purpose?
Replies: >>4452079
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 1:07:55 AM No.4452079
>>4452074
I was told by /p/ that it's not possible to edit poorly anymore so it must be the cameras he likes to use
Replies: >>4452082
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 1:10:24 AM No.4452082
>>4452079
It's not, if you follow /p/'s advice, which is
>Don't buy a sony
>Shoot raw
>Install capture one
>If you dont know what you're doing, only touch the exposure, white balance, and highlight sliders and then click auto levels
Ken on the other hand uses a bizarre fucking 50-program pipeline for jpegs
Replies: >>4452083 >>4452089
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 1:11:31 AM No.4452083
>>4452082
Don't forget, the sharpening radius should never be more than .7 unless you're printing
cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE
7/25/2025, 1:35:08 AM No.4452089
>>4452082
/p/'s advice is lately "buy a Sony" or "buy a GFX", "ergonomics don't matter", and "if your photos suck it's not you, buy a new camera"
Replies: >>4452125 >>4452174
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 3:11:55 AM No.4452125
IMG_2290
IMG_2290
md5: 0383583f4600e23b9cc9f7758508e316🔍
>>4452089
have sex incel

>ergonomics dont matter
this is true. ergonomics are for the crippled. blobmeras are made under the assumption that all customers are employers or professionals.
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 4:35:18 AM No.4452172
>>4452060 (OP)
bc he's a hopeless aspie nerd who has too much gear and yet ruins all his photos with dumb decisions anyway, like the worst of the gearfags on this bored.

>I secretly dream of one day doing ass to mouth on the dick that smacked him across the eyeballs & made him need a 4000x saturation boost to his crappy jpgs to see color.
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 4:39:22 AM No.4452174
>>4452089
>Buy a sony
That's a solid decision
>Buy a GFX
That too.
>Ergonomics don't matter
You bet they don't. Ergonomics are for aging newsmen.
>if your photos suck it's not you, buy a new camera
Digital made this true. It was nice when it was a lie, but digital made this true.
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 5:43:15 AM No.4452188
>>4452066
It was something about the D800 that somehow made him turn 180 from Nikon shill to Canon shill
I mean the 5D mark III was pretty good but I don't think the D800 is somehow THAT shitty in comparison to completely flip him.
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 7:55:49 AM No.4452220
* Ken Rockwell isn't the Chuck Norris of photography; Chuck Norris is the Ken Rockwell of martial arts.

* Ken Rockwell's camera has similar settings to ours, except his are: P[erfect] Av[Awesome Priority Tv[Totally Awesome Priority] M[ajestic]

* Sure, Ken Rockwell deletes a bad photo or two. Other people call these Pulitzers.

* Ken Rockwell doesn't adjust his DOF, he changes space-time.

* Circle of confusion? You might be confused. Ken Rockwell never is.

* Ken Rockwell doesn't wait for the light - the light waits for him.

* Ken Rockwell never flips his camera in portrait position, he flips the earth

* Ken Rockwell ordered an L-lens from Nikon, and got one.

* Ken Rockwell is the only person to have photographed Jesus; unfortunately he ran out of film and had to use a piece of cloth instead.

* When Ken Rockwell brackets a shot, the three versions of the photo win first place in three different categories

* Before Nikon or Canon releases a camera they go to Ken and they ask him to test them, the best cameras get a Nikon sticker and the less good get a Canon sticker

* Only Ken Rockwell can take pictures of Ken Rockwell; everyone else would just get their film overexposed by the light of his genius

* Ken Rockwell's nudes were fully clothed at the time of exposure

* Ken Rockwell is the only one who can take self-portraits of you

* Rockwell portraits are so lifelike, they have to pay taxes

* When Ken Rockwell went digital, National Geographic nearly went out of business because he was no longer phyically discarding photos

* For every 10 shots that Ken Rockwell takes, 11 are keepers.

* Ken Rockwell never focus, everything moves into his DoF

* The term tripod was coined after his silhouette

* Ken Rockwell never produces awful work, only work too advanced for the viewer

* Ken Rockwell never starts, he continues

Anyone who replies to this post acknowledges that Ken rocks and denounces the talmud.
Replies: >>4452342 >>4452591
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 3:45:30 PM No.4452342
>>4452220
Inshallah
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 3:11:19 AM No.4452591
>>4452220
>Ken Rockwell is the only person to have photographed Jesus; unfortunately he ran out of film and had to use a piece of cloth instead.
H O L Y B A S E D
O
L
Y

B
A
S
E
D
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 7:30:37 AM No.4452744
don't like his plain looking Web 1.0 site we aint about that nah we Gucci L website
Replies: >>4452767
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 9:44:43 AM No.4452767
>>4452744
Fuck your bloatware