Thread 507012767

internet /pol christians be like:

>"israelites were white. we wuz rabbis that practiced usury and shit"

why do internet christians associate everything disgusting and abominable about modern jews with their ancestors and think that is some kind of own?

>>507012767 (OP)
Christian identity clown gang was mostly run by an Indian dude who did it all to marry a white woman.CI tards are like groypers totally retarded.

>>507013099
CI still better then normal christians

>>507012767 (OP)
christgolems have always served jews.
Tacitus, Histories, Book 5
>For the worst rascals among other peoples, renouncing their ancestral religions, always kept sending tribute and contributions to Jerusalem, thereby increasing the wealth of the jews

Before going to the gentiles/goyim (ἔθνη), saul was asked by james, cephas, and john to remember the poor which he was eager to do.
Galatians 2:9-10
>And recognizing the grace that I had been given, James, Cephas, and John—those reputed to be pillars—gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship, so that we should go to the gentiles/goyim (ἔθνη), and they to the circumcision (jews). They only asked us to remember the poor, the very thing I was eager to do.

What does "remember the poor" actually mean? And why was saul eager to "remember the poor"?
Romans 15:25-27
>But now I am going to Jerusalem, ministering to the saints. For Macedonia and Achaia were pleased to make a certain contribution for the poor among the saints in Jerusalem.
Yes, saul was instructed by james and the apostles to collect contributions from christgolems for the poor among the saints in jerusalem.
>For they were pleased, and they are debtors of them. For if the gentiles/goyim (ἔθνη) have shared in their spiritual things, they ought also to minister to them in the material things.
What is saul's reasoning for collecting contributions from christgolems? According to saul, christgolems are debtors to the saints in jerusalem.
Why are christgolems debtors to the saints in jerusalem? According to saul, christgolems (gentiles/goyim) shared in the spiritual things of the saints in the jerusalem.
What are the spiritual things that christgolems shared in?
John 4:22
>You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is of the jews.
1/2

>>507014143
The following is an example of the amount and frequency of the contributions that saul collected from christgolems:
1 Corinthians 16:1-4
>Now about the collection for the saints, you are to do as I directed the churches of Galatia: On the first day of every week, each of you should set aside a portion of his income, saving it up, so that when I come no collections will be needed. Then, on my arrival, I will send letters with those you recommend to carry your gift to Jerusalem. And if it is advisable for me to go also, they can travel with me.

Is the collection of contributions from christgolems (((prophesied)))? Yes.
Isaiah 61:6
>But you will be called the priests of yahweh; they will speak of you as ministers of our god; you will feed on the wealth of the goyim, and you will boast in their riches.
See: https://biblehub.com/text/isaiah/61-6.htm

See:
ἔθνος- https://biblehub.com/greek/1484.htm
>Corresponding Greek / Hebrew Entries: - H1471 גּוֹי (goy)
2/2

>>507012767 (OP)
The God of the Jews != God
It's actually satan. Abrahamics worship a specific demon. Some Jews are pretty open about it - the monolatry never died. Muslims and Christians pretend it's God. Christians are the least evil of them(Abrahamic devil worshippers) because they are the deepest in denial, and because they really try to reach God proper rather than staying stuck on Jehovah, even if they wrongly believe the two identical.

>>507012767 (OP)
The kikes and the sellouts have added to the Bible and that they have basically tried to rewrite what god, jesus christ and the holy spirit have said, money is the root of all evil and in 23:19 god stated what he said about usury, now the kikes couldn't have that so they added what they wanted and they try to pass it off by adding to the bible and claim that it's from god. The kikes deserve the hottest part of hell. See pic

23:19 is what god, jesus christ and the holy spirit has to say about usury

here is the link frens
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy%2023&version=KJV

Why Christians live rent free in your head?
Lmao

>>507016640
>The kikes and the sellouts have added to the Bible
Then stop believing in the bible

Reminder to tradcaths and other christcuck groups trying to hijack America.

>>507012767 (OP)
You left off Tacitus' description of the Britons' religion. They didn't believe in graven images. They only worshipped God in the abstract.

Here is the migration pattern of ancient Israelites.

1. 722BC. Assyrian conquest. House of Omri (bit-Khumri) dispersed. Josephus tells us they were sent across the Euphrates.

>>507017944
2. Κιμμεροι/Kimmeroi/Cimmerians appear in the historical record. They are chased out of the Pontic Steppe into Thrace, according to Herodotus.

https://odysee.com/@KnowMoreNews:1/Jewish-Blood-Magic-720:9
Judeo-Christian Blood Magic

https://odysee.com/@KnowMoreNews:1/cjb-podcast:e
Christianity: A Religion for the 'Other Side' | Know More News LIVE w/ Christopher Jon Bjerknes

https://odysee.com/@KnowMoreNews:1/Real-Case-Against-the-Jews:a
Jews Explain How Christianity Conquered the Gentiles

https://odysee.com/@KnowMoreNews:1/Jesus-Myth-Presentation:f
Is Jesus a Myth? Examining the Evidence | Know More News LIVE

>>507018053
3. The Cimbri, a Germanic tribe, appear in the historical record. Strabo and other ancient historians claim they are the same people as the Cimmerians.

>>507018169
4. Across the North Sea from the Cimbri, a group of people calling themselves "Cymry" (the Welsh) appear. They do not practice usury, do not commit adultery, do not worship graven images, and have knowledge of astronomy that rivaled the Babylonians.

>>507017944
t. 722BC
>>507018053
t. ca.700BC-400BC
>>507018169
t. ca.200BC-ca.200AD
>>507018331
t. ca.400AD-present

Picrel is the Gundestrup Cauldron, an artifact of the Cimbri found in modern Denmark containing Thracian silverwork.

>>507018664
>Go not the way of the gentiles
>I am sent not but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel
t. Quotes from Jesus, in Matthew

>>507018815
St. Andrew, the first Christian, whose cross adorns the flag of Scotland, traveled to Scythia, where the Cimmerians were known to have lived, in his evangelical mission.

>>507018951
Aristobulus, mentioned in the new testament, traveled to Britain and evangelized the Welsh before the year 100AD. He traveled 3000 nautical miles, to the ends of the known world, after Jesus told his disciples >>507018815

>>507013834
CI is zionism retard

>>507019263
Belief that Germanics should control the Holy Land. Yes, I believe that.

>>507019683
>Holy Land
Lol it's a shitty ass desert. Europe is the holy land.

>>507020221
We should control that shitty ass desert, and Europe, and America. Each is a gift from God to our people (the Israelites) for having blessed the world with our presence and our many inventions improving the standard of life for everyone. Anyone that disagrees is Amalek.

Let me guess, you think my views are "anti-white" and "anti-European".

>>507020437
>Anyone that disagrees is Amalek.

well that settles it then.
retard.

>>507020769
>noooo we shouldn't control Europe, America, and the Levant, because... that's anti-white!!!! You're retarded!!!!
Lol. Ok

>>507012767 (OP)
JEWS ARE NOT ISRAELITES
JEWS ARE NOT JUDEANS

>>507021206
Fuck israelites and judeans, kikes should've all been glassed harder by the Romans.

>>507020437
>our people (the Israelites)
Lmfao yeah that's pretty anti-White when you consider what the 12 tribes of israel were up to.

>>507012767 (OP)
Matthew 3:9

the lineage of ancient Israelites has no bearing on anything today

click here to learn more

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt4rWLVAW5g

>>507021133
we shouldn't care about some shitty desert patch because it was controlled by a distinct race of pedophile usurers that you have a disturbing degree of respect for. again, fuck off retard

>>507021339
People go astray from time to time. Following God's commandments will bring you back to center. For example, in all Anglo countries globally, Christianity is in decline, faggotry is on the rise, Anglo birthrates are in decline, and foreign immigration is on the rise. It's not anti-Anglo to point out these facts. What would be anti-Anglo is encouraging these countries to go down the path they're already on, instead of following the example of the Christian ancestors that made these countries great.

>>507021601
>noooo we shouldn't care dude! Morals are relative and stuff, man! Let the brown hordes have that land!
Lol. No

>>507013099
This. Plus as someone who was raised Christian and was Christian most of my life before the redpill, the Christian Identity stuff is 100 percent online astroturf. No actual Christians of any sect or any level of literacy about biblical times believes that white because it isn't true. It's kikes desperately trying to get people on the fence about Christianity to stay Christian so that their Christian sensibilities and weaknesses can still be exploited by the jew.

>>507021603
By your "logic" the crucifixion of jesus was White on White crime facilitated by the White Roman government.

>>507021707
Did you ever consider using CI to move oblivious Christians that the
>(they who say they are)
jews
>(but are not and do lie, and are the synagogue of satan)
use as pawns over that same fence, to convince them that jews are bad, and they should care about their race?

>inb4 "no fuck those white christians, let them die under jewish influence"
Very umm "pro-white" of you

>>507022293
>they who say they are jews, but are not, and do lie, and are the synagogue of satan
t. Jesus' way of addressing his murderers

>>507021282
Israelites are not "kikes" you mouthbreather.

>>507022422
That's from Revelation and he's addressing one of the churches in Asia. Christianity is not and never will be pro-white no matter how much you want it to be.

Reminder that numerous Christian churches claimed to have Rabbi Jesus' foreskin. Christians would pray in front of it lol.

>>507022623
>Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
John 8:44; Jesus speaking to those who said they were jews, but were not, and did lie, and were the synagogue of satan

>>507014143
>>507014200
Have you ever got a Christian to acknowledge these posts or have 100% of them just ignored it and pretend to never see it? It seems they only practice a small number of verses from the Bible and ignore anything inconvenient

>>507022422
>>507022465
The sadduccees and sanhedrin, who ordered him to death, were israelites from the tribe of levi. There are zero jews involved in the death of jesus by CI logic, only "Europeans" killing a White man.

why indeed

>>507018664
>claims cimbri didnt believe in grave image cause they were secretly jews
>posts cimbrian graven image as proof

>>507021553
wow, is that my favorite jewish audiobooker spammer?

>>507023198
The christcucks go to argument is that the Jews from the bible are not the same Jews from today. They twist themselves into knots trying to cope about this.

>>507023582
clearly you are drawn to the Word

>>507023599
I dunno guys, collecting goyim foreskins, sacrificing children and swindling your brother out of his inheritance all seem pretty jewy to me

>>507023248
Use of Levites in the priestly caste was all but wiped away by the Assyrian conquest; the few Levites that remained were not able to maintain exclusive control of the priesthood by the time of the Hasmonean dynasty. Even assuming the priests were legitimately from Aaron's line (no proof of this), they would've been heavily diluted with Judaean blood, if indeed they were Jewish at all and not complete foreigners as Jesus said.

>>507023461
>all of Khumri/Cimmeria/Cimbri/Cymry, over the span of two thousand years, was just one (1) person
Anon, I...

>>507023886
>Use of Levites in the priestly caste was all but wiped away by the Assyrian conquest
No this is complete nonsense. You guys have these weird copes about the Baylonian and Assyrian exiles resulting in bloodlines being diluted and such, but the high chief of jerusalem that ordered jesus to be delivered to Pilate was a levite, joseph caiaphas.

>>507024142
There is literally 0 evidence that Caiaphas was a legitimate Levite. As I said, even assuming (generously) that he was, his Levite blood would have been diluted by Judaeans and/or Canaanites over the span of 700 years.

>>507024256
>There is literally 0 evidence that Caiaphas was a legitimate Levite
It never stops hahahahahahaha jesus christ. This shit is so pathetic.

>>507024313
Your ad hominem isn't a valid argument, I'm afraid.

>>507023760
Oh i have studied the word alright

>>507024361
Your ad hoc copes aren't valid arguments, I'm afraid :^(
Maybe if you spent as much time looking into your own people's history as you did inventing alternative jewish history you'd actually love Europe.

>>507024006
>thinks germanic tribes worshiped a jew god because tacitus claimed they had no graven images
you know he says right after that they only worshiped the sun, the moon and the stars as gods right? that isnt your jewish religion

White Christians hate their own so much that they'd rather side with African and South American Christians.

>>507024658
The irony of this guy having "hyperborea" in his name too. A lot of Christians will adopt numerous pre christian iconography and concepts, claim it as their own, and then boast about it. They act precisely like Jews and browns.

>>507021707
Its probably more simple than that
>Why are RW grifters becoming

>>507024478
I do love Europe: I love the stories of, e.g., the heroism of the Horatii in making their oath and their subsequent triumphant combat; I loved reading Titus Livius' account of Scaevola's bravery in front of the Etruscan king; who doesn't feel the rush of Publius Scipio's righteous vengeance upon the Carthaginians for his lost father and uncle during the second punic war? What's more, I can put their triumphs in the broader context of world history -- they descended from the Trojans, who themselves descended from the Dardanians, who descended from Darda of the tribe of Judah. The Greeks likewise are acknowledged in Maccabees to be of Abrahamic stock.
Even more than these tales of ancient history, I love the tales of Christian Europe, which saw the rise of every modern technology and luxury, including the phone that ungrateful shitskins like you use to distort that glorious history.

>>507012767 (OP)
Usury among your people is bad, but if a foreign nation like China or Ukraine took a loan from you, it would be ridiculous to lend it for free when that money comes from your own people's pockets. The woes of usury usually come when the State allows it to happen among its own subjects, not by charging strangers. That way, it would never be a case of an usurer making a dashing career inside your country, because it's prohibited among citizens. I don't see what's so bad about that passage given the proper context

>>507024540
If you'd ever read Herodotus, you'd understand a little better just how fluidly the ancients viewed their own gods / worship.

>>507018169
Half of those tribes were Celtic

>>507012767 (OP)
Keep in mind that Deuteronomy was set of laws and rules that Moses did to the israelites of the time, where it was permissible to do the sufficient to survive and thrive. This includes the diet and tattoos.
Theres 613 mosaic laws that are that... "mosaic" or "Law of Moses". God's laws are merely the 10 commandments.

You're also suffocating yourself on the Old Testament, where the Mosaic Laws are fulfiled by Jesus, where the only set of rules are the 10 commandments, whereas Christians don't abide with the "permissible usury" that the jews did in the OT.

>>507025042
>The Greeks likewise are acknowledged in Maccabees to be of Abrahamic stock.
>in Maccabees
Complete insanity. You know "israelite" was never a real ethnicity, right? These people were canaanite polytheists who became monolatrous canaanites. The torah is largely a work of fiction. Abraham never existed. Moshe never existed. Even assuming those heebs were real, jesus acknowledged that the pharisees came from the seed of abraham.
>ungrateful shitskins
2/3 of christendumb is brown and your CI kikery is predicated on the notion that the first White man was a cuck raising a mixed race child. Go find your coalburning trad wife, be like the cuck you idolize in your torah :^)

>>507025429
t. This is a post from a conniving kike that doesn't like the thought of White Christians returning to their former glory.

>>507021702
You want us to believe that whites invented foreskin and did all the genocides and incest and pedophilia in the old testament?

>>507025523
>It is found in writing, that the Lacedemonians and Jews are brethren, and that they are of the stock of Abraham
1 Maccabees 12:21, KJV

>>507025652
Herodotus records that circumcision was invented by the ancient Egyptians and passed on to other cultures. The ancient Egyptians were (at the height of their culture, with Ramses II) white. So yes, it's likely that whites invented circumcision.

>>507025101
>>507021133

christkikes defending usury and zionism geg.
and you wonder why we hate you.

>>507025783
Yeah it's bullshit since the Philistines were of Greek stock and allegedly looked at that kike david with envy due to him being fair. Once again, you've run into another instance of "White on White" crime, where "White" israelites slaughtered and stole the foreskins of White Greeks, who, for whatever reason, were from the line of abraham but didn't have a covenant with your jewish god.

>>507025945
>nooo you can't say whites should control more land! That's anti-white! That's why we hate you
Die kike

>>507025971
>Yeah it's bullshit since the Philistines were of Greek stock and allegedly looked at that kike david with envy due to him being fair.
Source for this?

>>507025945
Not an argument. Usury among your people being forbidden is good. Usury towards foreigners that take loans from your people's hard earned money is good. The moral is: seek your brothers for help, and charge foreigners when they take from your people's hard earned money. I wonder what's your argument against that

>>507026097
>Philistines were Greek
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2208581-ancient-dna-reveals-that-jews-biblical-rivals-were-from-greece/
https://greekreporter.com/2025/01/20/ancient-philistines-greek-origin-dna/
>1 samuel 17:42
And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance.

>>507026621
So your argument is that the Philistines, being white Greeks according to a popsci article, hated David for his white skin? And this proves the ancient Israelites were nonwhite (even though, again, you say David had white skin)?

Just making sure I understand.

>>507026884
>according to a popsci article
Not an argument.
>hated David for his white skin
That's what your (((bible))) says.
You can play fucking retarded all you want, but you can't refute the notion that the Greeks, and therefore the Philstines, would've been under god's covenant if they were of abraham's seed. And in fact we see that neither of them were since they were all uncircumcised.

>>507025945
When you lend to your family, do you charge them interest?

>>507025042
Antiquity was so far advanced over the Christian Europe that it took about a millennium to get back to the level of knowledge the Greeks and Romans had. The Greeks figured out the world was round and the Christians believed it was flat.

>>507025547
Jews aren't white

>>507027206
Your argument seems to be breaking down. First of all, I wasn't arguing anything by pointing out that your source was a popsci article; I was merely stating an obvious fact. Second, David being white SUPPORTS my general thesis. Finally, whether or not they were under God's covenant is not really the point. Plenty of descendants of Abraham have fallen out of God's covenant. The fact remains that the ancient Israelites were white, and many of them went on to become Christian Europeans (your ancestors, unless you are a shitskin as I've recently surmised).

>>507027862
>The fact remains that the ancient Israelites were white
no amount of spam is going to make this ameriturd brainfart true, subhuman

>>507027396
Don't tell me you actually believe all that stuff about a European "dark age"..?
It was Copernicus, a Christian, who first mathematically described the heliocentric model; his book was dedicated to the pope.

>>507028064
His argument literally hinged on the fact that David was white... but maybe you have a more sensible refutation of my assertion?

>>507027862
>Your argument seems to be breaking down
Nope.
>David being white SUPPORTS my general thesis
He wasn't, he was a brown jew. It's hilarious that you think Greeks would disdain a Levantine man for being fairer than them.
>Plenty of descendants of Abraham have fallen out of God's covenant
So you're back to hating Europeans and claiming that Greeks were no different than filthy jews who lost favor with god. You have zero sources supporting the notion that Greeks were ever of abraham's seed, except for a throwaway line in a jewish book that's considered apocrypha by most christians.
>The fact remains that the ancient Israelites were white, and many of them went on to become Christian Europeans
>fact
Lil guy, you don't know what a fact is and how they're established lmao.

>>507028159
DNA and centuries of European archaeology and linguistics have already settled the matter, you are the laughing stock of the internet

>>507028159
>His argument literally hinged on the fact that David was white
You don't even capitalize White, you shitstain. But no, learn how to read, nigger. My argument hinged on the fact that the kikes who wrote your jewbook said they were White and the Philistines (Greeks) disdained that.

>>507012767 (OP)
Rome was ran by Jews you fucking retard. The Phoenix and its symbology matches by the United States “eagle” is proof.

>>507012767 (OP)
>deuteronomy
holy ugly word

>>507026193
such a cope lmao. go back spic

>>507028177
>He wasn't, he was a brown jew. It's hilarious that you think Greeks would disdain a Levantine man for being fairer than them.
You made that claim, and cited the Bible.
>So you're back to hating Europeans and claiming that Greeks were no different than filthy jews who lost favor with god. You have zero sources supporting the notion that Greeks were ever of abraham's seed, except for a throwaway line in a jewish book that's considered apocrypha by most christians.
I never said I hated anybody. On the contrary, I love all Europeans and hate to see our glorious history diminished by those who don't understand its scope. We saw whites driven out of Asia Minor and Greece in antiquity. We saw it in Italy under Tiberius. We see it today in Germany and England. Why is it so inconceivable to follow this trajectory backward into the Levant and even into Egypt, when all evidence from scripture to the mummified remains of Ozymandias attests to this fact?

>>507028252
>DNA and centuries of European archaeology and linguistics have already settled the matter, you are the laughing stock of the internet
Can you show me these sources? Anon literally cited a popsci article ITT saying ancient Levantines were white, and even cited scripture saying Israelites were white.

>>507028306
"White" is not a proper noun. I don't capitalize adjectives unless I begin a sentence with them; but please, lecture me more on literacy.

>>507012767 (OP)
>Look at this out of context bro
Alright here's the tl;dr if you don't know anything about theology aside from /pol/ screenshots
The Old Testament was basically using the jews to create a "landing pad" for Christ
Christ is the fulfillment, for all people
The jews could not handle this, and felt rug pulled
They have been coping and seething at God about this for 2,000 years

>>507028502
>You made that claim, and cited the Bible
I made the claim that the bible said the Philistines disdained (((david))) for being White, but I've made it abundantly clear that the bible isn't a valid source. I'm not telling you what I believe, I'm telling you what your kike book you clearly haven't read actually says. You still haven't explained the problem of all of the "White on White" warfare, with people who were of abraham's seed being considered mortal enemies of the israelites.
>Why is it so inconceivable to follow this trajectory backward into the Levant
Because pic related, idiot. The way you describe israelites viewing Greeks wasn't exactly reciprocated.

>>507028252
>you are the laughing stock of the internet
They're a laughing stock amongst christcuckery too. They should just convert to Judaism.

>>507028652
sources about what? that linguistically Indo-European and semitic have nothing to do with each other? that there is not a single documented archaeological link between the bronze age levant and Europe? that genetically the only link between Europe and the levant goes back to 10000+ years ago?
CI exist only among dysgenic online amerimutts for a reason

for genetics, you are in luck, you can start from here https://www.exploreyourdna.com/studies.aspx and filter by region; pro-tip: the levant has been sandnigger since ever

>>507028758
>"White" is not a proper noun
>>507025547

>>507028894
>Ancient Israelites were tribalist and racist, therefore they were nonwhite.
...what? Have you ever met a scotsman?

>>507029151
Yeah nice reductionism you fucking loser. Thanks for doing your part to remind the board that christkikes are just as bad as actual kikes.

>>507028983
>that linguistically Indo-European and semitic have nothing to do with each other?
This is demonstrably false by observing English, Welsh, and Hebrew cognates
>that there is not a single documented archaeological link between the bronze age levant and Europe?
The temple of Solomon featured Corinthian columns. Other structures from the time show extensive European influence. This is merely one example.
>that genetically the only link between Europe and the levant goes back to 10000+ years ago?
10000+ years is beyond the period we've been discussing; this claim in particular (that the Levant and Europe had contact within the past 10000 years) is a point in favor of my argument.

>>507029463
>This is demonstrably false by observing English, Welsh, and Hebrew cognates
stopped reading immediately, you don't have a clue and this conversation is pointless

>>507029120
Wait, are you upset at me for capitalizing "White" now? What kike pilpul!

>>507029463
>This is demonstrably false

>>507029509
Amerimutts

>>507029250
>ad hominem
Again, not an argument.

>>507029555
>gets caught in a lie
>you can't do that!
You missed a proper noun, shitskin
>>507029151

>>507029603
You ignored 95% of the quotes so you could lie by omission. You've been downgraded to worse than a kike status.

>>507029582
>>507029509
Just a few examples, here you go

>>507029653
>hehe you made a le typo! That means you lose le argumente! I am so le smart!
Riveting

>>507029861
>Just a few examples
not one of which is correct and is corroborated by actual evidence
making shit up is free and you can even sell it for a profit

CI is terrible.

I don't care if the 'real jews' were white. What Yahweh did and commanded in the Tanakh is immoral either way.

It's no proud thing to be a slave of Yahweh.

Backwards and barbaric book.

You're clamoring to be worthy in the eyes of the Demiurge, claiming to be the Demiurge's chosen people.

>>507029711
>read my 1000 page essay of a screenshot so I can distract you while the thread dies!
No. Not how /pol/ works. Post it on /his/ with a link and I'll read it, happily

>>507030008
>You're clamoring to be worthy in the eyes of the Demiurge, claiming to be the Demiurge's chosen people.
Someone's in the know

>>507029942
Which part is incorrect? Be specific

>>507030110
all of it, especially hilarious as many of those words are from Latin not even Germanic, e.g terrible and ad, the absolute state of your kind, they can literally sell you anything

>>507030008
>>507030055
>framing your objection to Christianity using terminology popularized by Gnostic Christians
Oh, the many layers of irony.

>>507030212
I literally said ITT that Romans/Latins were descended from the Hebrews as well, through Darda.

>>507030345
unfortunately it's impossible to explain how linguistics works to a racemixed brown colored animal and that it's not based on vague and random sound similarities

>>507029916
Maybe if you weren't such a weasely little jew who did shit like this reductionist nonsense >>507029151
You wouldn't get pedantic nonsense in return.
>>507029861
>first word
>baash
make to be abhorred, loathsome, odious, cause a, make to stink, utterly
https://biblehub.com/hebrew/887.htm
Gullible retard, get real sources.

>>507030011
Kill yourself.

>>507030512
It may be impossible for *you* to explain, since you don't understand it.

>>507030266
>Gnostic Christians
Gnostism predates Christianity by a lot

>>507012767 (OP)
>/pol
D&C thread

>>507012767 (OP)
There's so much shit going on right now nobody has time for your garbage slide threads

>>507030573
>>first word
>>baash
>make to be abhorred, loathsome, odious, cause a, make to stink, utterly
>https://biblehub.com/hebrew/887.htm
>Gullible retard, get real sources.

*checks list*
>bash -- baash -- abhorred
Can you just not read, is that what all this is about?

>>507030713
Your point?

>>507030794
What does bashful mean, shit for brains?

>>507030618
>afraid to have a real discussion on /his/
>spams 4000 kike-created D&C anti-white screenshots he expects you to read in full
>reverts to ad hominem when he gets called out
I see you kikel :)

>>507031031
>crying about the thread dying almost 200 posts from bump limit
>NO U R THE JEW
Thanks for contributing to christian hate :^)

>>507030993
Fun fact: word meanings are fluid. Like "faggot" used to mean a bundle of sticks, and "gay" used to mean "happy". But when I call you a gay faggot, I'm not calling you a happy bundle of sticks :)

>>507031131
>word meanings are fluid
Like your gender?
So we have bashful
>shy, reluctant
And ba'ash
>abhorred, foul odor
And we're expected to believe these are etymologically similar. Nope, you're just a coping transjewish nigger.

>>507031116
>all threads are guaranteed to reach bump limit before expiring

>>507031301
Newfag, this thread won't expire as long as there's activity. It will take at least 30 minutes from now to archive if there are no more posts. You made up some jewish bullshit to avoid addressing that Europeans saw your faggot kike israelites as detectable suhumans, like you.

>>507031391
>destestable

>>507031290
Abashed:
>from old French, "abaissier", meaning "to make ashamed"
Baash:
>to be offensive morally
Yes, they are related. It's not even as big a stretch as "faggot" or "gay"; are you denying those words their etymologies?

>>507031391
Yes and Scotsmen (white) detest Irishmen (white). It doesn't mean Scotsmen aren't white.

>>507031610
>from old French
You defeat yourself lol.

>>507031731
>you said you drove through Texas on your way to Florida, that means your journey can't have begun with Nevada!
Your stupidity is a marvel

>>507031832
Buddy, you're now claiming that transliteration from French and hebrew to English result in a handful words with letters in common. This is so fucking desperate it's hilarious.

>>507032049
Not at all what I'm claiming; my claim is that the English word "bashful" has its roots in old French "abaissier", both of which originate from the Hebrew "baash", which was used to mean "to stink" or "to be morally offensive". When the words sound the same, have similar meaning, and come from people known to have originated in the same place, the natural conclusion is that they are true cognates. You honed in on this one word to try (and fail) for a "gotcha!", but I provided many other examples (which, I'll add, were far shorter still than the many-page document you asked me to read).

>>507031694
Scotsmen (Angloroons) ARE Irishmen (Angloroons).

>>507032800
Ulster Scots, yeah.
>Angloroons (whites) ARE Germans (whites)
a similar statement one might make

why are christian priests always at these gay protests?

>>507032344
>both of which originate from the Hebrew "baash" [sic]
Show hard etymological evidence linking hebrew to Old French lmao.

>>507032950
No dipshit, the Scots tribes came from Ireland.
The only difference between a Scot and an Irish is that the Irishman is slightly more likely to be a straight-up Englishman LARPing for cultural reasons.

>>507033083
First, define "hard etymological evidence", so I know I'm not wasting my time on something you'll immediately reject out of hand.

>>507033145
Scots (Cimmerians) claimed descent from "Greater Scythia" in their Declaration of Arbroath. Irish probably shared that ancestry, although several waves of immigration are reported to ancient Hibernia.

>>507012767 (OP)
Retard detected.

>>507033154
Anything more comprehensive and scholarly than whatever the fuck this unsourced horseshit is >>507029861

>>507033275
yeah and the scythians were pagans you retard, not jews or israelites or whatever your fantasy wank is all about

>>507033311
Show them every pebble in the mountain of evidence; they will still denounce it as a mere pebble.

>>507033362
>can't even clearly articulate what evidence would convince him
Yeah, you're definitely not brainwashed.

>>507033311
so jews didnt kill jesus, the judahites did. okay?

this semantic word game is very similiar to shit kikes will play, like saying germans have no true claim to germania because germans arent the same as the germanic tribes. jew, judean, judahite, whats the different? theyre all a bunch of foreskin cultists

>>507033393
Israelitish abandonment of their own God is precisely why they were exiled; yet there is evidence they retained some old customs (as mentioned ITT).

>>507033275
Scots are also retarded illiterates and wewuzzers just like the Irish, it's almost like it's a genetic tendency or something. They were a Celtic tribe that came over from Ireland and now they're a largely-English mixed population that likes to LARP, just like Irish.

>>507033409
what evidence? every historical account of the scythians says they were polytheistic pagans you retard. arguing that scots descend from scythians isnt the own you think it is. where does this retarded idea that scythians=jews come from anyway? are you really so braindead you think every ethnic group in the old world was descended from jews?

>>507033582
what old customs? name a few
>exiled
scythians didnt come from israel you retard, they came directly from the homelands of the original aryans in central asia.

>>507033479
You think the torah is a work of historical non-fiction precisely because you were groomed to believe it as a child.

>>507033673
>>507033614
Are you saying Scyths were a totally distinct people from the ancient Israelites? What about the Israelitish city literally called "Scythopolis"?

>>507030345
Dardanians are literally Kosovo albanians you absolute fucking retard.
Even the name is explaniable through albanian.
>The Dardani (/ˈdɑːrdənaJ/; Ancient Greek: Δαρδάνιοι, Δάρδανοι; Latin: Dardani) or Dardanians were a Paleo-Balkan people, who lived in a region that was named Dardania after their settlement there.[1][2] They were among the oldest Balkan peoples, and their society was very complex.[3] The Dardani were the most stable and conservative ethnic element among the peoples of the central Balkans, retaining an enduring presence in the region for several centuries.[4][5]
>Ancient tradition considered the Dardani as an Illyrian people.[6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Strabo, in particular – also mentioning Galabri and Thunatae as Dardanian tribes – describes the Dardani as one of the three strongest Illyrian peoples, the other two being the Ardiaei and Autariatae.[13][14]
>The name Dardan- (ethnonym: Δάρδανοι/Dardani; toponym: Δαρδανική/Dardania) is traditionally connected to the same root as dardhë, the Albanian word for 'pear'.[16][31] The ethnonym Pirustae, which is attested since Roman times for a tribe close to the Dardani or living in Dardania, is considered to be the Latin translation of Dardani (cf. Latin pirus "pear"),[32] which would confirm the link with the Albanian dardhë.[33]
Nothing semite / jewish / israelite / whatever the fuck about the dardani, nor Latin ot italic btw.

>>507033780
On the contrary, I think a great many details in the Torah are historically inaccurate. However, as when, e.g., Herodotus describes ants the size of people, I know which segments to believe as fact and which are more dubious. It would be foolish to throw away everything Herodotus said because he claimed, e.g., Africa couldn't be circumnavigated.

>>507033876
5 seconds of google dismantles your argument. it wasnt founded by ancient white jews, it was in jew land because scythians invaded it. try again

>>507033950
>We are the Ionians because we descend from Ion!
>We are the Dorians because we descend from Dorus!
>We are the Aeolians because we descend from Aeolus!
>We are the Benjaminites because we descend from Benjamin!
>We are the Judahites because we descend from Judah!
>We are the Latins because we descend from Latinus!

>>>We are the Dardanians, because "pear"!

>>507033876
>Scythopolis
>-polis
>Israelitish city

????????????????????
how fucking retarded are you?

>>507034163
>AI overview
Wew lad, you got me

>>507034477
Beit She'an is believed to be one of the oldest cities in the region. It has played an important role in history due to its geographical location at the junction of the Jordan River Valley and the Jezreel Valley. Beth She'an's ancient tell contains remains beginning in the Chalcolithic period. When Canaan came under Imperial Egyptian rule in the Late Bronze Age, Beth She'an served as a major Egyptian administrative center.[3] The city came under Israelite rule in the monarchic period. It probably fell under Philistine control during the time of Saul, when, according to the Bible, his body was displayed there along with his sons.[4]
During the Hellenistic period, the settlement was known as Scythopolis (Ancient Greek: Σκυθόπολις).


Problem?

I hate christgolems so much its unreal.

>>507034725
Kek. Please tell me this isn't edited.

>>507034069
>just discounts the *word of his god* because a man in the fifth century BC wrote about large ants (actually marmots) he heard were on another continent
W E W L A D
E
W
L
A
D

>>507034504
so prove the AI wrong. why would the 'israelites' name a city founded by them 'scythopolis'? -polis is a greek suffix you fucking retard

>>507035125
well duh, polis is probably a hebrew word too

>>507034431
>ancient people that were called X lived in Y spot
>modern people that live exactly in Y spot have a word that explains the X name
>other ancient people with the most documented language in human history translated the X name into exactly the same meaning as modern people from Y spot's word that explains the X name
>all of this makes somehow less sense than X people being secret fucking jews that founded Rome before settling Scotland, nevermind Rome still existing without discontinuity and treating scotts like weird savages upon first contact, and not like long lost cousins.

>>507034896
I don't believe every word of the Bible is the word of God. I'd have to believe the Council of Nicaea, and by extension the Catholic Church, was divinely inspired, if I were to believe that. Why would I believe those things?

At the same time, it isn't fair to say 0% of it is true. Why are you trying to force everything into extremes? Could it be you are a kike, desperate to paint Christian Identity as delusional? Why would you do such a thing? Can it be that the elevation of Europeans to the status of "God's chosen" is somehow threatening to your interests?

>>507035310
I'm European and you're telling me I'm secretely a desert dwelling jew that got stranded up north.
I won't hear whatever else you have to say.

>>507035125
>prove the AI wrong
Resorting to AI hallucinations now... just pathetic. The burden of proof is on the believer and not the skeptic; I won't prove your AI delusions wrong, you need to do that yourself.

>>507035198
I see the confusion. You are referring to the Illyrian Dardani, not the Dardanians of Asia Minor (who traced their descent from Dardanus/Darda of the tribe of Judah).

Who you're talking about:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dardani
Who I'm talking about:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dardanians_(Trojan)

>>507035520
>no populations ever migrated, EVER
ok

>>507034609
>fell under Philistine control
>Hellenistic period
Another self own. It was never called Scythopolis under your torah kikes.
>>507035310
>Could it be you are a White man, successfully painting Christian Identity as delusional?
Yes, it could. Yahweh is a faggot and was forced on my European ancestors through deception and false promises.

>>507035875
Which were related retard, your own "source" says so.
>The Dardanoi were linked by ancient Greek and Roman writers with the Illyrian people of the same name who lived in the Balkans (i.e. the Dardani), a notion supported by a number of parallel ethnic names found both in the Balkans and Anatolia that are considered too great to be a mere coincidence (e.g. Eneti and Enetoi, Bryges and Phryges, Moesians and Mysians).[9][10] Strabo described the Dardanoi as Illyrians and this view is also supported by modern scholars.[11][12][13][14][15] Archaeological finds from the Troad dating back to the Chalcolithic period show striking affinity to archaeological finds known from the same era in Muntenia and Moldavia, and there are other traces which suggest close ties between the Troad and the Carpatho-Balkan region of Europe.

>>507035978
>Another self own. It was never called Scythopolis under your torah kikes.
False; Josephus refers to it as Scythopolis. The truth is, the "Scyths" that inhabited that region were likely remnants of the lost tribes of Israel that had migrated back from Scythia, where the lost tribes were known to have been sent (see >>507018951).

>>507036139
>Josephus : AD 37 – c.100
So a lot later than 3rd century BCE.

>>507036036
And? I literally said they were "related" to the Romans, too. What's your point? Are you back to saying they didn't descend from "Dardanus", but rather
>*checks notes*
"Pear"?

>>507036278
>3rd century BC
oddly specific. Why do you care about that time period?

>>507035917
migrations can be mapped and charted using language and archeology as evidence. none of the linguistics add up with your horseshit we wuzz jews theory. >>507029861 you tried to claim here that 75 percent of english words come from hebrew. that is a blatant lie, i dont even need to research half those words to know those are germanic words with no relation to hebrew

>>507029861
>raven

>>507036139
When was the hellenistic period, guy? Who controlled Palestine when josephus lived?

>>507036296
One guy didn't create a race retard. This was a metaphor to say X and Y people were related because their mythical founders were brothers etc.
The name comes from pear because they probably made lots of pears. Illyrians used crop / livestock names a lot to name their tribes, as they bartered between tribes. Dalmati comes from delmë = sheep in albanian for instance.

>>507036355
That's when the jew city with a jew name was terraformed into Scythopolis. If a jew called it that before you would be right, but none did.

>>507036375
>i dont even need to research half those words to know those are germanic words with no relation to hebrew
My entire claim is that ancient Hebrew -> Germanic -> English
The Germans weren't even recorded in history until after Cimmeria, which was after Khumri (their ancestors).

>>507012767 (OP)
>and what of making money from money lending??
>well what of making money from murder???

---Cicero

>>507036710
yeah its funny how hes just completely ignoring that the original name of the city was benna hoishe or some jew shit before the greeks invaded it and renamed it. guess because that sorta dismantles his whole theory

>>507036821
and cimmerians were....also pagans with zero connection to jews, making your theory retarded and pointless

>>507036613
>>507036710
It was under Roman rule in Josephus' time. What of it? What does that have to do with anything?
>>507036616
>One guy didn't create a race
The Dardanians certainly seemed to think he did.

>>507036870
My proposition is clearly spelled out here >>507036139
Have you no rebuttal?

>>507036870
He also rewrote BCE into BC when quoting me. Absolutely deranged.
Nevermind that AD used to mean Anno Diocletianus before christians hijacked it.

>>507037014
because scythopolis is very obviously not a hebrew word you fucking retard but youre the only dumb faggot in the thread too uneducated about how languages work to realize it

>>507036995
Where did the Cimmerians come from? What happened to Bit-Khumri after the Assyrian conquest?

Answer these two questions for me, or I'll go on believing that Khumri -> Cimmeria as all evidence suggests.

>>507034844
The photo is FAKE, factchecked by True American Patriots

https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/09/26/cnn-trump-photo-loomer/

>>507037014
>a city whose namesake came under Greek rule and was discussed by a jew while under Roman rule proves the israelites were scythians because it just does ok
Completely insane. You're doing a great job making CI look delusional.

>>507037132
Why does it matter if it was a Hebrew word? "Phoenicians" wasn't a Canaanite word. Are you saying the Canaanites weren't Phoenicians because the Romans called them something different?

>>507037276
>Why does it matter if it was a Hebrew word?

>>507037276
>that the Phoenicians weren't Canaanites because the Romans called them something different?
FTFM

>>507037344
Same old tired ad hominem, same lack of an argument. Is this all you've got? Answer me
>>507037276
>>507037364

>>507037364
You know the israelites were canaanites despite calling themselves something different, right?

>>507037276
it makes it very obvious the the scythians who settled there were not jews or israelites or whatever but scythians brought there with the Hellenist conquest. there is zero evidence to document that they were really jews being repatriated to their original homeland. scythians came from central asia, the homeland of the original aryans, not from israel

>>507037344
checkem

>>507037437
The Israelites certainly didn't seem to think so; nor did the Canaanites.

>>507037429
Same old tired red herring. You couldn't support your claim here >>507033876
You don't get to just selectively follow your own gay debate decorum, then kvetch endlessly that you don't get a scholarly thesis in response to every braindead thing you say.

>>507037444
>Hellenics brought along the Scythians in their conquest because... well they just did!
No

>>507037514
>The Israelites certainly didn't seem to think so; nor did the Canaanites.
According to what, exactly? The torah?

>>507037014
>West america was spanish in 1000 because there's a city called Los Angeles there
>indians never called it that? What do you mean? Chief Running Bear from the three feathers Casino called it Los Angeles in 2014!
That's how you sound.
>>507037014
>The Dardanians certainly seemed to think he did.
No they did not. Dardanians never left any writings btw, the whole people founding tribes and cities is a greek storytelling play that romans and jews and others copied.
We don't know what Dardanians said about their own origins, but it was probably the same animist shit you find in albanian folklore in that region today, i.e. the thundercock sky mountain god got really horny one day as he watched super hot earth waterbush lady wash herself ,...

>>507037566
You still haven't proven any of my claims about Scythopolis false, though. My claims are these:
>it was a Hebrew city
>after the Assyrian conquest the occupants were dispersed into Scythia
>After that, those Scyths came to occupy the city again
>Greeks saw this and said, "look, those Scyths occupied that city! Let's call it Scyth-city."
Where's the problem (besides in your literacy)?

>>507012767 (OP)
you made thatt shit up completely. we say the east was more white before arabs invaded not that aryans are canaanites. retarded shill

>>507037592
>documented historical fact is wrong and the scythians were actually le jews because it fits my shizophrenic jew worship and....well it just works!

>>507037683
Except that the Americans of 1000AD weren't calling themselves Spanish. The Dardanians of 1000BC were calling themselves descendants of Dardanus. At least that's what's recorded in the Iliad. Let me guess, the Iliad is more inaccurate garbage that we shouldn't think about, right kike?

>>507037888
>documented historical fact
Can I see these documents?

>>507037819
Arabs didn't invade Anatolia or the Balkans in any significant number, for any significant time, and there is no significant genetic heritage from them in those places.

>>507037759
>complains about "pop science" articles
>posts zero evidence whatsoever

>>507038182
It's "documented historical fact", lelz

>>507038269
>so pussyhurt she's using zingers from one anon on another
Kek. Can I see these documents? Actual documents, not an unsourced map with haphazardly drawn migration patterns you got from 4chan.

>>507038015
We are talking about Scythopolis. What have proto Kosovars from Balkan alps to do with any of this, taking place in a jew desert beyond the sea? Please help me out here.

>>507012767 (OP)
>r*ddit spacing.
Kike faggot.

>>507023198
Yes, they will usually say
>they were good jews because they worshipped jewsus
>the money was tithe for the jerusalem church
and they will completely ignore saul's reasoning for collecting contributions.

>>507017641
>>507018101
>memeflaggot
jeet or jew?

>>507038596
Always a kike until proven jeet.

>>507038399
All "unsourced maps" I posted ITT were from wikipedia, FYI.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assyrian_captivity
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cimmerians
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cimbri
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cymru

If you think Wikipedia is putting a pro-European spin on things... well let's just say you're retarded and leave it at that.

>>507038442
You and I were talking about Dardanians, not Scythopolis. My conversation about Scythopolis is unrelated, but I'm happy to entertain you if you can refute one of my points here:
>>507037759

>>507038698
>kikes were White
>pro-European
Lmfao. The "israelites" have nothing to do with Europeans, you dipshit. The Scythians and "israelites" didn't even share Y DNA haplogroups to any appreciable extent.

>>507012767 (OP)
Christianity is the most true, complete, and comprehensive philosophy ever produced by mankind. The Holy Bible is the most perfectly preserved and maintained text, kept in its original status for thousands of years, measuring nearly 800,000 words in length, and despite its wide authorship maintains incredible overarching consistency, meaning, and allegory, a personal narrative mixed with overwhelming philosophical truth which has served as the basis of western thought, philosophy and literature for 1500+ years, to a degree no other work has even come close to matching. The idea that “conmen” could somehow put together the longest lasting, most literarily significant work in all of human history, spanning an incomprehensible breadth of the human experience, is patently absurd.

Beyond this, the unique nature of the Triune God perfectly adheres with every single facet of how we comprehend and understand reality.

Three distinct points form the triangle.
The triangle, in turn, gives rise to the circle. Together, they form the primordial language of shape, structure, and unity.
The triangle isn’t just a shape — it’s a symbol of unity through distinction, of harmony through relationality. From quantum particles to divine Persons, from geometry to time, from physics to thought, the triad seems to be the language of reality itself.

So while it may not explain every empirical detail: The triangle as unity, structure, and relation, reflects the fundamental pattern by which all things are made and understood. In that sense, reality itself is triadic at the deepest level.

>>507039444
CI tards work by exception instead of the rule, look at the whole niggerbabble he started with Dardanians, he manages to find a vaguely compatible name in the bible mentioned once in passing and completely irrelevant and that was pronounced more likely like Dardáh(accent on last) or Dorda(Jerome's Vulgate) and builds an entire theory on that

CI christanzees are vastly worse than jews, it's not even close

>>507039444
One of us is arguing that White Europeans are the literal chosen people of God, and were behind every important civilization in history, but a pattern of foreign migration has continually been the downfall of our societies.

The other of us is arguing that White excellence was a flash in the pan of the ancient world, and that the important contributions of Christian Europe were done in spite of spiritual conquest by foreigners.

Which is the anti-white position? Hmmm

>>507039645
See >>507039704

>>507039759
you are lying and shitting upon some 3-4 centuries of European scholarship, you are vermin of the worst kind and wouldn't even be good as soap

>>507039645
It's unbearable. Everything is a "jewish lie" except the torah and half baked British israelism theories from 200 years ago. Because nothing's more sacred than their canaanite storm god yahweh and his israelites who were stealing foreskins and lighting menorahs.
>>507039704
>One of us is arguing that White Europeans are the literal chosen people of God of israel
Yeah, it's (((You))). Maybe your god should've delivered the torah to actual Europeans.
>the important contributions of Christian Europe were done in spite of spiritual conquest by foreigners
Yep, Europeans would've been greater without a religion that originated in *judea*. Amazing that you think disagreeing with this is the pro-White stance.

>>507039915
I am literally repeating what Europeans themselves have believed for hundreds of years. European Israelism has existed since the early middle Ages (even before that if you allow biblical sources).

>>507039939
>Yeah, it's (((You))). Maybe your god should've delivered the torah to actual Europeans.

You’re a child throwing a tantrum because of a perceived slight against your identity based off a limited concept of who your ancestors were thousands of years ago.

>Yep, Europeans would've been greater without a religion that originated in *judea*. Amazing that you think disagreeing with this is the pro-White stance.

Europeans didn’t develop algebra or precalculus or other advanced mathematical concepts until 1000 years of Christian dominance. Engineering, art, and intellectualism peaked in Europe long after the multiethnic, multicultural state of Rome fell. Germans only founded the modern idea of an ethnically defined nation state under the rule of Christian kings. Christianity unlocks the full potential of humans based off their biologically defined limits and denying this is laughable and exposes monumental ignorance of history.

Btw Jews could keep white Germanics as slaves in Rome until the Theodesus code abolished this and their many other privileges.

>>507039939
>what??? The English were BROWN! Always have been! Nevermind they conquered the world, I don't wanty white skin associated with those brown English!
t. Anon, 2500AD, after the Paki conquest of England is completed

>>507040226
>I am literally repeating what Europeans themselves have believed for hundreds of years
name a single Roman or Greek source saying they descend from jews
no? maybe because middle ages Europeans had 0 knowledge whatsoever about their origins before they started researching it and were using the bible as only alternative?

like the worthless cattle you are, you are literally completely unable to escape jewish ownership of your mind, I hope they send your kind to be blasted by iranian bombs ASAP, you make me sick

>>507040462
>name a single Roman or Greek source saying they descend from jews
>>Greco-Roman mythological and historical records only stretch back to 700BC, therefore they didn't exist before that!


Why is it that the explosion of ancient Greco-Roman literature coincides so perfectly with the Assyrian conquest and dispersion of the Israelites, btw?

>>507040816
so Europeans in the middle ages had a TRVE knowledge of their TRVE origins but the literal inventors of history, Greeks, cannot be trusted?

this is why christians are considered far worst than the worst jew on /pol/

>>507040462
>I hope they send your kind to be blasted by iranian bombs ASAP, you make me sick

>>encourages war with Iran out of nowhere
Kike confirmed, 100%

>>507040920
the more christian amerimutt filth dies the better the world is, jews are right in exploiting dysgenic barn animals you

>>507040909
No one has ever claimed that Greeks invented history. You may be referring to the attribution of Herodotus as the father of *historiography*. Learn the difference. A world existed before Greece. The facts of that world may surprise you

>>507040992
>jews are right in exploiting dysgenic barn animals you
t. "Pro-white", btw

>>507041028
fantastic pilpul, your masters and owners must be so proud
>>507041075
you are not white, European or human, Hitler was too optimistic about your kind, you are a golem, your only purpose is filling every aspect of life on the planet present and future with tikkun olam

>>507041075
Anti Christian posters are infected with a Jewish mind virus if they are not outright shitskins. This conditions them to lash out in spiritual anger and confusion. They don’t realize this is the very playbook that Jews have recently introduced to the world in the last couple of centuries to decouple western civilization from its theocratic Christian roots. As if modern anti-white hatred and self destruction would have come about by any other way but secular, materialist, liberal worldviews pushed by Jewish sophists.

>>507041174
Always amusing to see shitalians call Americans "mutts". You brownoids literally "we wuz" White Romans.

>>507041616
please disappear ASAP

we

>>507041245
Jews unironically fear Christianity. Anti-Christians don't realize they are more cringe than outright atheists.

>>507041674
As the whites in your country have already done? Lmao

>Jews unironically fear Christianity
bet: in 20 years american carcasses will be sent by law to fertilize the holy land

>>507041714
wuz

>>507041714
kangz

>>507041857
>>507041674
>>507041174
Lmao this shitskin is MALDING
I remember my time in Vicenza, fucking your sisters. Those coal-black eyes gleamed with delight, to be used by a white man's pleasure.

>>507042121
you are the biggest anti-christian publicity we could ask for and don't even realize it

>>507041857
Probably not actually. Jews hijacked American Protestantism with the Schofield Bible but the Light of Christ is rapidly routing them back out.

Give me one good reason why reverting back to a religion that already lost to "cucks" is a good idea? And don't give me the "muh ancestors" argument because most of them didn't believe in this pagan horseshit anyways, I'm talking actual pragmatic reasons, does it forbid race-mixing, is it anti-jewish, etc

>>507023198
>>507038491
>>507014200
>>507014143
first red flag, trying to display a line of thought across several books talking about things that have their own contexts.

>poor among the saints in Jerusalem
a jew believing in christianity was rather outcast. they suffered a lot for it, and were central to the spread of it. therefore help them out.

>Isaiah 61:6
pre judgement believers will be rewarded greatly in the post judgement world. post judgement is post resurrection.

in their glory refers to the fact that they are happy.

looks like there is a lot of rebuilding to do post judgement, as an enormous amount of shit is destroyed. believers will have a higher authority and people will work under them.

>>507012767 (OP)
The Germans didn't even have money back then.

>>507042339
Well first you have to define what they mean by their “ancestral religions”. Of course this is a problem because the only reason we have any idea at all of what they were is from small surviving fragments which European Christian scribes carefully copied and preserved across history. Then you have to consider if they follow Germanic Paganism, from which specific tribe/people, Roman Paganism, which in turn was a Latinized copy of Greek paganism, which in turn was based off of mythologies carried from the Fertile Crescent/Levant - the same place Christianity arose, so technically you could argue all offshoots of Greco Roman pagan ideals were also originally “shitskin religions”. So once you determine that and then cobble together the few remaining artifacts left of what they actually believed - because much of it was oral and primitive - then you have to retroactively fit concepts you personally prefer that came from Christian Europe (ethnically derived nation states) onto these primitive religions that hadn’t achieved the societal development necessary to actually define these ideas in the first place.

>>507014200
>Diocletian brutally oppresses Christians
>Christians deface his statues once they gain power
>"Nooo you can't do that your book says you need to be nice or something!"
FAFO

only a few specific groups have the time or inclination to spam anti-christianity so frequently. one of these groups (pajeets) is much more numerous and less qualified than the others

the majority of pajeets on /pol/ try to hide the fact that they're pajeets. in addition to "leaving that part out" they will proactively, persistently misrepresent their true form. pajeets are all about assuming other people's roles, from today's outsourcing and replacement migration all the way back to thuggee bandits lying to travelers about who they were. pajeets are devoid of their own identity, making them the ideal globalized goyim. they don't want a home where they belong. all that means to them is "compete in squalor." much better to go somewhere nicer, built by other people, and do their jobs for less pay and live slum-barracks life in their suburbs. pajeets don't want to be home. they also don't want to be pajeets. jews know exactly how to play their insecurities and dopey ambitions like the innocent rube fresh off the bus from the cornfield. this is their new golem to replace the ones that don't love them anymore

>WHAT IS A PAJEET?
the best way to define pajeet is
>descended from south asian subcontinental ancestry.

political distinctions on maps or signified by flags are false and irrelevant. everything south of the himalayas that isn't gooky-chinky is pajeet. pakistan, india, bangladesh, sri lanka are all pajeet territory. enough of nepal is jeeted that they may as well qualify too.

all of these pajeets could stay where they belong and call themselves what they like, and nobody would disagree because nobody cares. however, because they profusely shit up the internet, and they mass migrate to shit up everyone else's homelands, they're all pajeets now. all counted together as the same thing, on the same visiting team as far as the human world is concerned.

hindu, muslim, sikh, atheist, etc; male, female, gendersexual, old, young, etc; deformed, odorless, fair & lovely, dark & deep, everything in between, etc... forget all of it. none of that proud heritage matters once they exit designated land to race with the globalist rats. now their entire overcrowded neighborhood at the bottom of asia is known as one source of one type of trespasser: the pajeet.

>ONLY A PAJEET DISPUTES THIS DEFINITION

>>507043119
The Jew’s conception of a Christian is very much a projection of their own feeble state; simultaneously, the Christian is a bloodthirsty, dominating, persecuting tyrant, but also a weak cuck who needs to bend over to his enemies. Of course that is just the reality of the Jewish nature, a victim who strikes you as they cry.

>>507042397
Galatians 2:9-10 occurs after the jerusalem council.
So when saul is asked to "remember the poor" they're talking about the poor in jerusalem.
The recipients of the contribution in Romans 15:25-27 are the poor among the saints in jerusalem.

>they suffered a lot for it, and were central to the spread of it. therefore help them
That is NOT saul's reasoning.
Read: >>507038491

>>507042223
Now post homosexuality rates by generation

>>507042397
>>507044112
Romans 15:25-27
>But now I am going to Jerusalem, ministering to the saints. For Macedonia and Achaia were pleased to make a certain contribution for the poor among the saints in Jerusalem.
>For they were pleased, and they are debtors of them. For if the gentiles/goyim (ἔθνη) have shared in their spiritual things, they ought also to minister to them in the material things.
What is saul's reasoning for collecting contributions from christgolems? According to saul, christgolems are debtors to the saints in jerusalem.
Why are christgolems debtors to the saints in jerusalem? According to saul, christgolems (gentiles/goyim) shared in the spiritual things of the saints in the jerusalem.
What are the spiritual things that christgolems shared in?
John 4:22
>You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is of the jews.

>>507012767 (OP)
Remember anons that one curious thing about christianity is that it has dominated the world for 2000 years, it has several anti-jewish statements in its holy book, the great majority of early Christians were White Romans and for most of its history it was White. Despite all that, why do kikes still exist?

>>507043391
Good point. The idea of Christianity metamorphoses back and forth to whichever is most rhetorically useful, the pursuit of truth and understanding abandoned for the sake of semantics and being right. That's quintessentially jewish.

>>507044282
Trash meme. Do you think the jews were the first ones to think to destroy a statue's face? There are surviving statues that were given the same treatment dating back to ancient Egypt; they even did it to some mummies. The statue on the left isn't defaced in the way the text describes, and the text is about how to ritually destroy an idol, for religious purposes. The defacing of the statue was an act of vengeance, as if to say "we conquered you" not an act of religious obligation, to divest the idol of its power.

>>507045269
>The narrowest genetic bottleneck experienced by Jews, specifically Ashkenazi Jews, is estimated to have occurred around 600–800 years ago (approximately 1200–1400 CE), reducing the population to about 350 individuals.
>This is based on genetic studies analyzing modern Ashkenazi genomes, which show a founder effect from a small group, likely due to historical events like persecution during the Crusades, the Black Death, or expulsions. The bottleneck led to increased genetic similarity and higher frequencies of certain disease alleles, such as those for Tay-Sachs and Gaucher disease.
>Earlier bottlenecks may have occurred, such as during the Jewish Diaspora around 70 CE or migrations to Europe, but these are less precisely quantified, with estimated founder group sizes ranging from 150 to 3,000. The medieval bottleneck remains the most severe and well-documented.
The closest jews came to extinction was under Christian rule during the crusades.

>>507045570
>the pursuit of truth and understanding

Lmao. You can’t even given an account for what truth is. You probably claim to act solely through “logic and reason” (immaterial immutable properties that exist beyond the material) but can provide no basis for why they matter or should be trusted beyond “they just should”, automatically confining yourself to a far more ridiculous leap of faith with no real backing as compared to the Triune God.

>>507045728
as usual the brown trash known as americans completely misses the mark, there was no christian created bottleneck, it's the same as someone saying the amish genetic bottleneck was created because "christians"(generic) were persecuted; sephardic jews have no such bottleneck, the ashkenazi one is a founder effect, their population in east Europe exploded in numbers under christians you fucking shit colored ape

once again, you are the best publicity for severe antichristianism there is

>>507045977
Oh you're back! You didn't answer >>507044160

>>507040367
>You’re a child throwing a tantrum
You're welcome to your personal feelings, but your friend here has spent over 100 years trying and failing to convince everyone that tzitzit, menorahs, and purim are European culture.
>>507040398
>out of arguments
Yep lol

>>507046105
when you get completely blown the fuck out and forced to change the subject the gentleman option is to leave you the last reply, but how about you post the amount of money donated every year by christian americans to israel thoughout the ages?

>>507012767 (OP)
Christ came for the jews to speak truth to the noble lie.

>>507046278
>trying to define European culture while rejecting the most fundamental philosophical basis of European civilization and people for the last 1500 years

Amazin’! The neat thing about Christianity is that local cultural customs can be seamlessly integrated with the acknowledgment of the immaterial and spiritual reality of existence as these go beyond such physical and material things.

>>507046289
>I ran out of counterarguments, so now I am trying to paint that as a good thing
Hahaha shitskin, you are so transparent.

>>507046289
American Protestants are heretical, most Christians would agree with this. Generally any group claiming to be Christian which retroactively makes changes to its doctrine and teachings and accepted moral code can be deemed heretical. Attacking American Protestants isn’t really a mark against Christianity as religious doctrine since they do not follow it.

>>507046730
so true!!!! chistian identity though, now THAT is absolute orthodoxy!!
CRUST IS LARD!

>>507046549
>christkikery is a shapeshifting religion
Nice self own I guess. Explains why African christkikery has its roots in a eunuch and many of them rape babies to try to cure their AIDS.

>>507045881
I didn't say any of those things, and I think you misunderstood me. I'm not a materialist, nor do I rely on pure logic and reasoning to navigate my daily life. What I meant is that when two people communicate, the point should be to converse in good faith for the purpose of understanding what the other thinks/believes, and hopefully coming to a deeper understanding of what truth is. A pilpulling jew doesn't care about that, he wants to ideologically dominate his opponent. If he can't convince him with logic, he'll trick, lie, coerce, guilt, shame, etc. I'm saying that Christianity is a fixed point, but that the jew will attempt to disguise it's true nature into whatever he thinks will trick you into abandoning it.

>>507046839
>a shapeshifting religion

Nope, it has a definite, perfectly preserved text clearly outlining its doctrine over thousands of years as well as uninterrupted succession of leaders spanning back to the formation of the first Church. A shapeshifting religion would be something like LARPaganism, which has no definitive or standardized text, teachings, principles, structure, leadership, etc, allowing one to project onto it an infinite array of beliefs that happen to make whatever individual involved satisfied

>>507047046
>Nope
Keo what a fucking retard. Have you raped a baby to rid yourselves of AIDS today, zambo?

>>507046549
How were kings selected in pre-christian european society?
>In early ancient Greece, kings were often selected by the people of a city-state.

Israelites weren't white?

>>507047307
You seem uncomfortably preoccupied with visions of niggers raping babies. I have to say your spiritual derangement is unsurprising.

>>507047348
>democracy

Absolutely disgusting.

>>507047376
they were brown sandniggers modern jews would bomb, see >>507028064

>>507047387
>stop talking about my fellow christians!
Go to Africa and tell them to stop integrating their local culture into your jewish religion. While we're on the topic, what was done to the little midianite girls who were only kept alive because they were virgins? I'm just curious what kind of doctrine you're preaching here.

>>507012767 (OP)
They worship a jew

>>507047551
>go to Africa

I’m not a nigger and care little what niggers do in niggerland. God will sort them out. Mainly, I’d just like to send niggers who have come to Europe back to their home Savannah where they can run free and happy.

>>507047428
The Phoenician noble lie, myth of metals, iis the basis of judaism.
Zionism is exactly the infection that killed 10 million Europeans.
Socrates could have fled, could thoes 10 million?

>>507047450
People say the same thing about Italians owing to their modern brown population (You). This is in spite of so many authors that document Roman whiteness.

>>507047729
So you're not a big fan of preaching the gospel to all nations like your rabbi said to do?

>>507039614
>Christianity is the most true, complete, and comprehensive philosophy ever produced by mankind
You're welcome to your personal feelings and opinions
>>507039614
>the Triune God perfectly adheres with every single facet of how we comprehend and understand reality.
Not really

>>507047876
thankfully Europeans discovered DNA, archaeology, etc.... so we don't have to do anything other than laugh at niggerlicious new world mongrel babble like yours

>>507047965
Do I think niggers should try to be told that their ways of life are fucked and their morals are backwards? Sure. I’m not entirely of the position that niggers are humans though given their average cognition is lower than that of many animals such as dolphins and gorillas, and the idea that they are equal is a relatively modern Jewish concept, so I’d reject that there is a moral imperative to preach to animals about things they cannot understand.

>>507048061
You can provide no alternative that doesn’t seek into self refutation and absurdity. You’re welcome to attempt it.

>>507048175
>we
Lmao. Post eye/hair color

>>507039614
>the Troon God
Also it's crazy watching you midwits try so desperately to intellectualize this trinity shit when "the holy ghost" impregnated a young girl who didn't have a choice in the matter.

>>507048239
post mutilated jew slave cock

>>507048219
>I’m not entirely of the position that niggers are humans
You're going to be miserable in the favela you call heaven.

>>507048272
> when "the holy ghost" impregnated a young girl who didn't have a choice in the matter.

I love when people who have literally zero basis from which to base any sense of morality or value judgments suddenly develop an objective sense of what is right or wrong when judging the creator of existence itself

>>507048370
Do you recognize the symbolizm of the rape of Mary?

>>507048370
This is circular logic you fucking retard.

>>507048219
>You can provide no alternative
Genuine empathy and personal responsibility are my alternatives. No silly rituals, no need for vicarious redemption, no ultimatum.

It's great :^)

>>507048298
We already saw the statistics; you're brown. Even if I were circumcised (I'm not), I can and do have white, blonde, green/blue eyed kids who are not circumcised. Your black eyes/hair are a shit-colored stain you leave on your (hypothetical) progeny.

>>507048370
>you have to believe in a god who has commanded babies and children to be murdered and, based on how you interpret the verses, condoned children being raped, to know that harming children is wrong
???

>>507048370
>zero basis from which to base any sense of morality or value judgments
Genuine empathy and personal responsibility

>>507048581
>We already saw the statistics; you're brown
>tp
>tf
kekkaroni >>507041674

Remember. No Moloch Satan Star.

>>507048762
There are more whites in my country than your entire rinky dink "continent".

>>507048901
Holy shit, how dumb are you?

>>507049159
Brown eyes/hair don't count, nigger

>>507048830
They are all children of David, who moloched his firstborn to Yahweh.
Can you do it without sacrifice?
Or are you their equal?

>>507013834
Why bother.

>>507049267
Woah
Heh. Way to get away from the drone bomb Joosh. Yeah.

>>507049255
Then there are fewer Whites in America than in Germany alone you fucking tryhard mongrel lmao

>>507049448
False.