>>507177767 (OP)I will thank them and sign up, do the training as they ask, and when the time comes to deploy, I will deploy. If we see combat I will use the training I got to fight back.
Why? Well why not? It's not like peacetime is particularly enjoyable. We all just want to have a good life right? Wartime is not a good time for many, and for most it's hell. But to say that war is pure hell for everyone would be lying. There are some people who quite enjoy it. Most famous would be Jack Churchill who enjoyed WW2 so much he started styling on people by getting kills with old weapons, including getting a confirmed lowbow kill and a confirmed sword kill. He wasn't the only one, I read newspaper clippings of British vets after WW2 and it was surprising the amount who said they enjoyed it and don't know what all the fuss is about (said in regards to complainers). And it wasn't just WW2. In Vietnam US soldiers are noted for having enjoyed themselves. Not conscripts obviously, but guys who willingly signed up didn't always have a bad time. And it's not like any of what I am saying is outside of historical president. The trend of hating war and considering it bad is extremely new, it's all post WW1 & 2 culture. Before the world wars the grand majority of men liked going and considered it just a dangerous adventure or a rite of passage into manhood.
So why the hell should I be against it? Sure the casualty rates of war are far higher than than they were pre WW1. But so what? Death just means you don't have to be alive anymore. It means no taxes, no more woke shit, no more government. You do believe in your own religion right? I do. I can't find much negative about going to war aside from the obvious in being wounded, and to avoid that, just threaten the medic and make sure he absolutely knows you'd prefer to bleed out over being a cripple.