Thread 507193785

There is no good reason why someone under the age of 28 and over the age of 65 should be allowed to vote.
Those people coupled with childless women and single mothers make democracy extremely flawed.

>>507193785 (OP)
this but instead change the criteria to a minimum IQ of 120 and an XY chromosome

Really it should be men above the age of 30 and under the age of 65 with property and kids and who have worked and payed into the system.

There should be some requirements for voting that anyone can do but which require sacrifice. My libshit parents would always caste a double vote because their quadriplegic vegetable son couldn't talk or do anything but drool and was braindead but they get to interpret him and vote twice for the candidate they like casting his vote for him. There's no standards at all as to who can vote.

>>507193785 (OP)
Software will probably resolve the youth's ignorance.
In the future we'll probably be able to forecast the pros / cons of implementing policy, making it more obvious who to vote for

>>507194113
>Software will probably resolve the youth's ignorance.
yeah because software so far sure educated people, instead of convincing them that they can cut their dick off to become a woman

I think a democracy of me and my close friends(none its a dictatorship) wouls be best.

>>507193785 (OP)
Little tweak. Voting rights only to those who paid into the system more than they recieved during the last term (4 year period) no matter the age. If a 15 year olds makes money after school and he pays more into the system than he recieves via public school, he should absolutely get voting rights. Same as a 40 year old neet parasite, which never paid shit in taxes, should have no voting rights.

I believe only the rich and the charismatic should be allowed to vote. If you do not have either, you get no rights and no access to free porn.

>>507195015
pfft porn is for losers, give it to whoever wants it, it keeps them from reproducing or lets them cope with the misery of their life