Thread 507240043

Source below.

At least 1 Jew pilot landed on the ground in Iran. Being hunted now. Other burning jet might have retreated to Iraqi territory

One F-35 hit by F-14, the other hit by anti-air missile from the ground.

The Jews got a little too aggressive, but you can't blame them.

>>507240359
Is that even possible?

>>507240503

Possible

>>507240503

>the brown mind attempts to comprehend advanced warfare

>>507240199
>>507240296
>>507240359
This is the Indian vs Pakistan cope all over again

>>507240503

Even the Houthis were locking on to F-35s with shoulder anti-air missiles. US Navy bounced out of the Red Sea after that.

>>507240043 (OP)
>>507240296
Why would they go into the danger zone? Don’t they know better?

>>507240043 (OP)
>Iranian F-14s are taking out Jew-F-35s!!!
I'll believe it when I see evidence

>>507240702
Israel has mostly been hanging back and launching stand-off munitions. They may have tried a deep strike and ran into defenses.

>>507240589
Do Iraniggers not know google image search exists?

>>507240503
F-35 are dogshit trash in a dogfight. Maybe he got too close.

>>507241017
It's like the Toyota Camry of fighters kek, just churn out thousands because some will be lost and obviously it's all fake and gay

>>507241017
>F-35 are dogshit trash in a dogfight. Maybe he got too close.
The F=14 is a great fighter just out dated

Kek sand niggers can just blow up mutts best jet

>>507240503
it's not the plane saar
it's the pilot

>>507240503
given they're flying way too far out of their normal range in seemingly impossible ways, maybe.

>>507240655
this is narrative, cope, brown, and based only on your need to vicariously oppose the mighty mutt beast that owns and oppresses you. sad. and very girly...you wanna fuck retard?

>>507240043 (OP)
HONHONHON HON HON HON

What a shit overpriced plane

>>507241408
that’s a Russian Su-24 being shot down by turkey

>>507240043 (OP)
>>507240199
>>507240296
>>507240359
NO DONT GET THE TOMCATS KILLED IM BEGGING YOU SHAH

>>507241238
this
we just saw this proved saaar

>>507240043 (OP)
>plane designed for dogfights is good against a fat multirole plane

fake and gay

>>507240621
>Western highly experimental weapons manned by inbred soliders
vs
>tried-and-true weaponry manned by highly skilled and independent nations

I'm starting to think these wars are just research for the military-industrial complex and they're realizing enshittification is everywhere

>>507240503
Stealth =! invincible. If an F-35 allowed a F-14 to get close enough, it's very much outmatched by that ancient fighter. The F-35 is probably configured for maximum stealth, which meant minimal weaponry in its internal bays, and if it was a ground strike aircraft, then it may have been relying entirely on escorts for defense. The F-14 wins that fight every time.

It would be extra hilarious if the first F-35 kill went to an F-14 of all things.

>>507240503
Why not?
Just unlikely.
But if it flew close then there's no reason F-14 wouldn't be able to shot it down.

>>507240655
The Houthis are the biggest chads in the world. Not even the Taliban can do what they have done

>>507241155
>The F=14 is a great fighter just out dated
>t. f-35 salesman
Seems like the stealth aircraft getting shot down by missles might be outdated too.

>>507240503
Stealth doesn't block heat seekers, prajeet

>>507240977
They literally don't
Notice how many shitskins are here spamming flagrant bullshit while you REEEEEE jidf

>>507241017
F-35s are good planes it’s just our pilots are diversity hires now (whites need not apply).

>>507240296
Would be the greateat comeback in NBA history

>>507242176
why do you retards fall for this fake and gay shit so easily

>>507242176
https://x.com/SprinterObserve/status/1933584246196625791

>>507242198

Maverick flies for iran now

>>507240589
Uhhh....

>>507241561
Stop posting facts

>>507240043 (OP)
I ran has no air force or air defense capabilities. The idea that they shot down anything is pure fantasy.

>>507242178
>Stealth doesn't block heat seekers, prajeet
Every "stealth" aircraft I know of has reduced heat signature. The F-35 has flares too.

>>507243085
>reduced
Doesn't mean shit if a heatseeker gets a lock. It's just a question of range.

>>507240655
Why do you shitskins lie on a daily basis? Is it because nobody is here besides shitskin brownoids?

remember how Iran took out the Mossad HQ and several f-35s the last time? Yeah it's propaganda again.

>>507242543
turkey is the top dog in europe.
EU keks would send a strongly worded warning to russia if this happened over estonia or sweden, erdoCHAD is a man of action though and puts the HIVans in their place.

Israeli pilot captured

>>507246377
>Israeli pilot captured

FEMALE JEW

>>507241521
Lmao, this

>>507246463
MUAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA I believe this is true, they should hang her publicly in Iran

dozens of hits on israel, not 7.

kikes seething so hard, just like oct 7 but 6M X worse.

>>507240503
of course it is, F-14 looks much better

>>507240884
It's real anon

>>507240199
>Iran media confirms
ok, ahmed

>>507242167
That's an f15e anon.

why is the f-35 so fucking bad

>>507240043 (OP)
You’re so stupid.

>>507242176
oh boy i hope they stream flaying of that jew

>>507240043 (OP)
The world’s greatest fighter jet, while piloted by inadequate, useless, effeminate parasite faggots, will underperform against inferior models.

>>507248245
Just a side not, if he is a pilot of f35, that is stealth fighter, dont you think parachute should be transparent atleast?

F-35 had a new Windows 11 update mid operation, the F-14 still using original CADC untouched by poo hands.

>>507249172
So now they’re F-16s.

>>507249172
guys what is it like to be captured?

>>507240503
Bro planes all suck. Stealth is propaganda.

>>507240043 (OP)
Based, the F-14 deserves revenge for the way she was treated by the Americans!

>>507242891
How do they keep Israel from blowing up their nuclear reactors like they did in Iraq and Syria then?
inb4 they're underground lol

>>507249584
>So now they’re F-16s.
when the truth eventually comes out it will be "a a super secret russian experimental plane, with two female chimps onboard, deviated from the course into the Iranian airspace and was shot down by a russian-made S-200"

Iran winning the telegram and shitter offensives I see. Meanwhile the kikes are bombing the shit out of Iran with near impunity.

>>507251594
She was treated just fine. They even made a whole movie to celebrate her glory.

>>507248245
LOL why are jewish pilot so bad. They can't even defeat literal 60-year-old technology. This is a huge lose in the information war. OMG I'm going to tell everyone at Harvard on monday.

>>507248739
it’s probably disguised as a tree or something

>>507240043 (OP)
>>>NOOOOOOOO, HOW IS THIS EVEN POSSIBLE!?! 35 IS A BIGGER NUMBER THAN 14 THAT MEANS IT'S BETTER!!!!!!

I'm legitimately conversing with literal children here.

>>507240043 (OP)
IDF has denied any losses.

Don't think they would say this without confidence knowing that any downed jet would almost certainly be shown on tv.

You can rescue a pilot but can't hide wreckage.

So no jet downed.

>>507247107
Will you hang yourself when it's proven false?

>>507240043 (OP)
Iranian pilots be waking up this morning like

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbyoNrwA_Gk

What is it with countries like the US and India and Pissrael making all their pilots women?

>>507253516
regardless, he will still be brown.

Kikes in overdrive trying to convince people ONLY shitskins and sand niggers hate them lol
Nah, normal people and real humans are starting to hate you also

F-35 doesn't need to be shot down to be decommissioned they are built so terriblely they decommission themselves.

>>507240043 (OP)
People reacting to this believing this isn't scripted, are mentally ill.

Time for the jews to abandon this thread and bump some other faggot shit next lol
>>507251731
>>507254120

>>507253516
When you speak to a Serb learn to speak with honour, we saved your rat asses in WW2, if we joined in with Hitler like others did he would've destroyed the Soviet Union and your nosey race would be a distant memory now.
>>507253796
Mutt calling someone brown LMAO! You retards literally worship niggers as gods.

>>507240043 (OP)
WHATS THAT GAY PLANE IN THE FRONT? THE YELLOW ONE IN THE BACK LOOKS LIKE A REAL WARPLANE

>>507254619
Those ideologies came into existence as a consequence of the first world war, lmfao. Pretending like they were known of or predicted and planned beforehand is hilariously retarded.

What a hilariously stupid post.

>>507240043 (OP)
I heard Iranian plane was piloted by no one else than Ghost of Kyiv himself!

>>507240043 (OP)
It's bullshit but I believe it

>>507240043 (OP)
Iran winning this is not in America's interest

>>507255969
It was Ghost of Teheran, you Chud!

>>507255708
SIRS
How many google play cards are the Israelis paying you for this? I know I have to tell you this but whoever is paying for you to be here is not actually that guy, it's Moshe Shekelstein in Tel Aviv

>>507240043 (OP)

Yeah but None of the shit is real since 2020 and probably B4.

>>507240503
Yes. All it takes is stupid. Some stupid m'fer has to abandon stealth, zip around like a dumbshite and get intercepted by the F-14 and get shot down by either missiles or guns.

F35 is meant to be sneaky and shoot from afar. Get too close, get detected and it's fucked. It's not a dog fighter, it's a stealth fighter.

So the test run against the reactor failed. What's the next step?

>>507255969
big if true

>>507242006
>enshittification is everywhere
Yep. People have NO idea all that DEI shite the pushed made the MIC enact shitflation on top of inflation to all military products. LM is literally DEI incarnate, and the F35 is their product.

>>507240589
Stop posting this. it's from years ago.

>>507255969
>Iran doesn't have Russian or Soviet air intercept capability
They're taking down US shit in Ukraine... Kikes really must be desperate lol

>>507256656
Are you serious?

That will take seeks to repair and in the meantime staff and the reactor itself is expose

They are fuck both of them they killed like a dozen people who made a difference, maybe, could be all bullshit and they just bombed every known residence of the president and the rest is collateral

>>507254619
Known forgery you retard

>>507257176
turn on Israeli flag
people can be replaces, nuclear reactors take years to build and if Israel had the capability it would already be destroyed. Israel can't reach it without direct US involvement obviously
you're fooling nobody

>>507240043 (OP)
Top Gun Maverick is the most fucking realistic movie ever made. F14 vs 5th gen fighters. F14 every time.

>>507240503
slop 15 is all tech no skill

>>507242006
I'm starting to think western "high tech" is just propaganda to inflate stocks, I mean just look at deepseek

>>507243085
The big plume of flames coming out of the back of a supersonic fighter is not heat cooled.

>>507242282
Third world subhuman cope

I think the most beautiful plane should always win.
So a F-14 easily beats a F-35.

>>507252411
>whole movie to celebrate her glory

>>507240503
modern missiles, modernized radar stuffs and other electronics, not impossible, just not very likely either. The home team always has a defense advantage, you need 3x the forces on average to outdo that. If that f14 was in contact with the local stuff...then yea? It can shoot a modern missile, with its groud stations, and its modernized electronics.

>>507256924
>LM is literally DEI incarnate
This.

>>507259967
Yes. The Final Countdown is what I was referring to. What did you think I was referring to ya chode smokin' felch monkey?

>>507258607
*Top Goy

In warthunder the Iranian F14 with Fakour missles (waaay better the the AIM54) can easily take out SU-35s so this is no suprise

>>507253044
yes, disguise it as a falling tree in a sandy desert.

they shall not spot it

>>507240043 (OP)
Iran may or may not be full of shit, kikes are always full of shit tho
The longer that Iranian reactor exists the more hilarious this will become. They're trying to take out all the Iranian heads of the army but they can't get a reactor even with them gone? lolz

>>507248245
Because the F-35 is primarily a defence contractor money laundering grift to extract tax payer money from the government. The F-35 program has had nothing but provlems and setbacks since the start but the gov pushes forward with it due to sunk cost fallacy.

did you guys try stuxnet again? maybe that'll work
and thanks for throwing your kike malware on computers all over the earth you fucking faggots

>>507240503
F14 best jet in the world, watch Top Gun
F35 dogshit

lmao no

>>507261239
This.

>>507248452
Based and 'flaying of jews livestream enjoyer' pilled.

>>507242176
looks like weather probe

>>507241521
Gaston... !
You can't gloat like that because it wasn't a JeetPilot, you should know better HON HON HON HON... ^^'

PS: Our Nafris gonna seethe hard cause they are about to get the largest F35 fleet in Africa anytime soon now...
Might be a time to eat le delicious croissant ;)

>>507242482
kek

deth to kikes!

>>507241561
Damn...
Turkey can down Su-24 ???
Better send (You)craine an urgent trucks caravane full of turkey to help with the Air Superiority aspects of their defense strategy against Rashya... ^^'

>>507262444
What country that we created is going to get F-35?

>>507247107
I know a serb who live in pissrael married to jewess and daughter is military pilot!

>>507261239
Better than blowing it on spics and niggers to racially replace us I guess lol
I love the F-35 now!

>>507248245
DEI pilot

>>507255475
In retrospect a bit of a stupid move if you ask me. Imagine if you would have join them. And defeated the jew and the bolsheviks. Your country would not had to go true communism. And would not be controlled by jewish bankers and the globalists. The western world would still flourish..

Kikes pretended some faggot shot down like 50 Russian planes in Ukraine
This is a claim of a single F-35 which have literally fallen out of the sky (and into the ocean lol) with no enemy action lol
Nice try tho Shlomos

>>507242133
>It would be extra hilarious if the first F-35 kill went to an F-14 of all things.
KWAB of the year nomination inbound ?

>>507243152
LOL ! LMAO even... Underrated Tomfoolery ^^'

>>507246377
Khannibal directive status ? activated ?
>>507246463
Khannibal directive disrupted... Abandon I repeat Abandon...
would be to misogynistic to Khannibal her...
Plus would are they to forbade her to marry her figher pilots husband who scored the best hit she ever felt and will ever feel in her entire life...
They have standards came on...
Looking forward to the ceremony pictures with all the Unit pilots and Officers handling her over their heads to deliver her to their now most reknown fighter pilot becoming her husband ;)

How the fuck could Iran do this?!?!?!

>>507263572
Saved

>>507255475
The reason Serbs didn't join the Germans was because they were literally genocidal towards you, it was a war for survival for you ideology didn't play part in it.

Only an uneducated and stupid serb would want the germans to win WW2
The krauts behaved very differently in orthodox countries, mostly against Russians and Serbs

>>507248245
Why are you trying to mislead people that hard (You) shill... ???

You should have known that playing this vid backward wouldn't get any traction at all as it is not realistic ffs...
It's a Vertical Take Off plane.... So of course playing it bacwards it would appear to "fall"...
I can't decide if it was bait or not... sigh...

Ghost of tehran?

>>507264205
did they rewind the video of the one crashing in the south China sea off the deck of an aircraft carrier?

>>507248245
>why is the f-35 so fucking bad
because the project was underfunded it needed a few more trillion $$$ to make it good

>>507248106
at this point iranian russian and chinese media are more reliable than western censored propaganda bullshit you fucking glownigger

>>507251594
Indeed...
>>507252411
Yeah, and after having made a photo/movie op, they just ditch her for a Super Hoe like any ingratfull pricks instagraming their latest chicks before moving onto collecting new ones lool...
It should have stayed in service, in the USAF at least, if the Navy was really into their newest hornista...

>t. F-14 fan (pun intended ;)

>>507264834
lol no it isn't, American media at least has a variety of viewpoints in it, you just have to sift the BS out. China and Russia are nothing but state controlled propaganda, you can't believe anything they tell you about anything.

>>507240359
>>507240043 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWM3TaPDm0g

>>507264083
Nope, first we had a government and a royal heir who supported Hitler but then the British staged a coup and suddenly we were sore enemies of Germans somehow lol.

>>507240043 (OP)
made by jeet and Boeing guaranteed failure

>>507258607
It was a good scene indeed, but I remember thinking there were a few technical flaws really intelligently used to trick the battle in favor of the F-14...
But it was a really nice scene nonetheless... ;)
Cheers Fingurufren !

>>507258607
>>507259929
F14 is the Aryan fighter

>>507265318
I'm talking about the people and why so many joined the resistance. Germany may have attacked due to the British coup but when German troops along with their Austro-hungarian and Croatian lackeys started marching in Serbia you had record breaking volunteers lining up to fight the invader.
You didn't have a deal like the Croats, Romanians, Bulgarians, etc had with a vassal leadership but untouched civilians.

The Germans were so damn retarded in Yugoslavia and USSR which is why they lost the war. There's a reason why the French had so little resistance fighters per capita compared to the Balkans and eastern Europe.

Germans somehow managed to fumble Ukraine of all places where they were indeed greeted as liberators by a shitton of people just to end the war with 7 (SEVEN!) million Ukrainians joining the Soviet army because the krauts were actually very serious about their Lebensraum project which is an incredibly judaistic ideology

>>507265061
Hilariously wrong. See you think that diversity of views == trustworthy views. We have lies and damn lies propagating the airwaves. Whereas they have to try to report the truth or else they are discounted entirely. This yeah state owned media in Russia/China/Iran IS more truthful and accurate than the like owned western media. Remember likes play BOTH sides in the west and are the only voices heard.

>>507264574
lol

>>507261463
It actually still is the best at its roll of super long range, carrier base, shoot the archer roll. Which is hilarious really after so many years.

>>507240043 (OP)
They have the F35i model correct? ALICE must be a muslim.

>>507262782
MuhRocco and Al Djeriya are perhaps about to offer us some kino...

MuhRocco is about to get 32 F35
While Al Djeriya will have Sukhoïs

>https://www.bladi.net/maroc-surclasse-algerie-bientot-arsenal,115222.html
>https://www.bladi.net/tensions-maroc-algerie-accelere-rearmement,115223.html

>google F35 Maroc Algerie // Sukhoï Algerie ;)

>>507267899
Héhé, that silly rivalry is exactly like the whole indian/paki feud. Same shitskins, only them can see a difference.

>>507264426
This also ! Yes ! Absofukinly truke !
But it was a sloppy job cause they also revealed to the whole world it's real intrinsinc specifity which is that it is also an amphibious plane...
But I guess having an admiral firing his rifle while looking through an inverted scope might explain why they couldn't smell the outcome of sloppy jobs...
But thanks for noticing that though fellow noticer ;)

>>507241017
*she

>>507263889
Oh, happy birthday BtW

>>507264881
Not the only Grumman plane that was mistreated

>>507264205
lol is this even bait or just a retarded ai??? can't tell

>>507268412
Hehehe....
didn't thought about that but you're quite right indeed Gaston HON HON HON !

At least, Egypt could eventually swoop in to settle their feud if they ever go into an air superiority contest...

PS: Rolling for Sahara Occidental zone of aerial conflict ???
Who will first get reached by the Sahraoui Movement...
The Polisario of Al Djeriyans or the Muhamedans of Mohamed VI ?...

Lots of questions and most of all, lots of potential Kino in a not so distant futur as some would say... ^^'

>>507240655
That seems unlikely. They wouldn't be flying low enough. But they would get a lock, they're infrared homing.

>>507241521
quick, sell them some rafales

>>507240359
F-14 Tomcat is peak aviation.
Prove me right.
Pro-tip: you can.

>>507240503
Theoretically yes. But it didn't happen.

>>507270290
You really haven’t figured it out have you? Stealth fighters come in low because long wave radar detects them perfectly well and allows for ambush SAM usage. So the stealth fighters come in low and fast to minimize engagement provability. It’s why we don’t see videos of F-35 high altitude bombing runs in any theatre so far. Which ironically means we’d have been better off buying a lot more 4th gen’s instead of the f-35.

>>507249584
Damn. Israel would have got its pp slapped if they lost an F35. Don't fuck with the defense complex and make them look bad.

>>507269035
You're quite a good knower !
I always thought your picrel would have made a sweet long range penetrator / bomber / SEAD appex predator...
Even though he was competing for Air superiority against the F-22...
A few adjustment and he would have been swiftly fit for deep penetration into ennemy territory for the above mentioned tasks...

But yeah, Grumman... RIP...
It is really a shame that they had the gut to let such a formidable Company to die like this, especially one with such a tremendously fabulous track record in producing top notch Aircrafts way over the edge respectively to their time...
At least some of their knowledge was incorporated into Gulfstream so that's why we got so nice Long Range Private Jets / MIL versions of them too...

But Goose would be proud he had survived...
Oh yeah, the Grumman Goose too was a beautifull aircraft !
Goose into another Grumman did I just imply ?... ^^'
Cheers !

>>507269833
>lol is this even bait or just a retarded ai??? can't tell
I am as perplexed as you from what I've reaad that prompted my response... Just like you ! Dare I say " my fellow " perplexed fren ? ^^'

>>507261239
The F-35 has facilities devoted to its development spread across 46 states. (Partly the reason it encountered such set backs). That's 92 senators voting for the spending bill Everytime. Hundreds of representatives bring jobs and money to their district. The presidents changed but the contract stayed alive and moving.

>>507271437
Americans are a weird bunch, they make some of the most advanced tech that is a decade ahead of the rest of the world, and then promptly ignore it in favor of some still advanced but vastly inferior version because it's a few dozen million dollars cheaper in the long run, then they notice a decade later that said tech needs to be replaced and so they go on another trillion dollar venture
>formidable Company to die like this
Vought and North American were, in my opinion, even more impressive, last one with the Xf-103 or the Yf-107, so was Republic Aviation with their Xf-103

>>507270377
Bad idea...
We already sold Mirage III to Israel back in time and ended up having to let them build the Kafir out of them Mirages III so if we sold Rafales to Persia, we'll have to hand over the blueprints of Rafale to Edomites so they can do the Kafir thingy once again...
Plus we would have a Government Strike for the first time in our History because so much of them will be offendedmexxed ba just the uttering of this idea...
Oh Vey...
Do you want to crahs our country faster than the current thing already my perfidious secretly loving not so much albion anymore ? ^^'

>>507270500
Underrated Self-Fulfilling Prohecy writer's hands type this post !

10/10 Id'ed GJ7z-Good Job 7 Zulu Time !!! ;)

>>507240043 (OP)
People are so shocked by this but they shouldn't be. The f-14 is still a flagship fighter that is pretty much toe to toe with the f-15, it was decommissioned by the US because the f-15 could do everything the f-14 could do but cheaper. The f-35 is not a flagship fighter, it's basically the new f-16, primarily made for ground strikes but with more stealth. In a dogfight an f-35 loses to the f-14. The f-22 is another story since that is the new flagship fighter meant to replace the f-15.

In short, the f-35 replaces the f-16. These are primarily ground strike aircraft.
The f-22 replaces the f-15. These are primarily interceptor/dogfighter aircraft.

>>507254619
>nazism
>1871

>>507273169
>it was decommissioned by the US because the f-15 could do everything the f-14 could do but cheaper
One was operated by the US Navy, the other one was operated by the Airforce, the fate of one wasn't influenced by the other at all, the 14 was actually replaced by the F-18 Super Hornet, since it could do most of it's roles with 80% efficiency or better for half the pricetag and mainteneance hours
>These are primarily ground strike aircraft
>F-16
Burger please, the F-16 was a venture into multirole with dogfighting specialization, it was the first aircraft to be made naturally unstable to increase agility and also the first to use digital FBW controls (The 15 had a hybrid analog-digital system) just for that, it's a monstrous dogfighter for it's time

>>507273954
The f-16 CAN dogfight and the f-35 CAN dogfight and neither one specializes in this endeavor as well as the f-14, f-15, and f-22 which are the flagship dogfighters. Faggot.

>>507240043 (OP)
we still rockin our cute F5

>>507272328
I couldn't concurr to what you said more than I am already ... !!!

Sadly, greed might play a big role into the ordeal you just described...

But to emphasize more on the most important part of your post, I'd say that Vought with the Iconic F4U CORSAIR and their F8 CRUSADER just to name a few, being as old as 1917, and North American with their Most Iconic P51 MUSTANG, plus the model you described, to finish with the Republic Aviation Valkyrie....
The biggest shame is that they thought that merging corps, or giving more subsidies to competitors would surpass what they had in the first place...
A rich groupment of corporations each having their own views and designs rivalling for the best performances...
Instead they headed toward a monolithic mindset of design as displayed by the latest project contestants.... YF-22/23 & YF32/YF35 to name just a few...
Guess the F47 being handed straight to Boeing will avoid such things but given the current context, who knows when the first flight will happen...
Boeing... Another gem that went overboard in the last decade at bare minimum...

It's one more reason to observe Politicians with "a special eye" and most of all, to never trust them because the only inclination they have, are with themselves, and not the betterment of tech marvels from a purely technical aspects, nor even the living condition of the people they were appointed for...

PS: Picrel is a treat for your eyes and a reminder of the beautifull era of shortening the world via tech development / aviation incremental perfectionment ;)
Plus a link if you wanna have a good read :)
>https://memoireshydraviation.over-blog.com/2018/05/a-la-memoire-du-f-bdrc.html

>>507274277
>one specializes in this endeavor
> f-14, f-15, and f-22 which are the flagship dogfighters
Lol, the F-14 is technically an interceptor not even a fighter and it shows, it was notoriously a bad dogfighter with it's underpowered TF30s until they got replaced by the F110-GE-400 derived from the F-15s, would lose all it's energy within a few turns and be splashed, it's strenght lied with the all-might AN/AWG-9 which was a monster for it's time so much so it's still somewhat effective even in the modern day, as for the other two the only one i can agree with is the F-22 as it's a 2d thrust vectoring aircraft with a lifting body type, the F-15 was made as a pure air superiority but it's primary strenght lied in the Radar comparable to the F-14s, of course due to it's high engine power it can keep energy and fight pretty well but in a pure no missiles 1v1 i'd wager it'd lose against an F-16 60-70% of the time, the 16 is just much more agile due to how it was inherently designed while the 15 is the last "classicly" designer fighter in many ways

Also do note that this was probably a long range interception so dogfighting capabilities don't even matter that much

>>507240503
Shitty, overpriced plane with a bunch of gimmicks, shitty, Jewish pilot.

>>507240043 (OP)
F-14 shits on the F-35 in a dogfight all day every day.

>>507275998
>Jewish pilot
one of them was female, i bet she is already pregnant

>>507240296
imagine reposting this retarded horseshit
muzzrats are absolutely pathetic

>>507275379
QT3.14 of the skies...
The Swiss didn't miss their shot at selecting a formidably agile fighter to suit their geography perfectly...

But could guess who else got an F5 too ?
Hint, those that repelled an aircraft carrier group recently... Lol...

The [spoiler]Houthis![/spoiler] ;)

>>507276353
It's the worst military catastrophe since the Houthis sank that Carrier several times...

>>507275676
>A rich groupment of corporations each having their own views and designs rivalling for the best performances...
Yeah i think that there's just not that much money anymore to prop up so many gigantic tech corpos, if you notice even American car companies closed down a lot of beloved divisions like Pontiac, Mercury and Oldsmobile

I mean, during the Vietnam war there were at one point at least a dozen if not more different aircraft fielded and a lot of them were conceptually very similiar role wise, F-100, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 111, Crusader, Phantom, A-3, A-5 and i'm probably forgetting at least a few, it's just more efficient nowadays to trial but a few projects and to grab the one that does everything you want the cheapest, and that's how you get sham trials like the ATF program which was obviously won by Lockheed mostly due to connections with the political class at the time, also the bad publicity that McNamara ran throrought his time as a politician i guess

It's very funny it got to the point that even you Frenchies had a shot at the F-14 title with the Vought 507 "Vagabond" co developed with Dassault Co, it's a shame that there never was such a vast amount of projects here in europe

>>507240359
talk to me ghúz

>>507263626
That ugly jew whore is in the running to make trannies with a beard passing compared to her.

>>507276526
>my PP status: hard
Chile got the f16 to flex on Perú, while keeping around 10-12 F-5E to flex on argies (pic related)
>F-5 aircraft were sent from the Chabunco Air Base in Punta Arenas to intercept the Argentine ships, which, he said, returned to our country's airspace.

>>507240043 (OP)
>Source below.
>clickbaiting on /pol/

>>507263332
No Anon. Instead of spending that money on niggers or the F35 that money should have instead been spent on more F22's and B2 bombers.

>>507246377
"It is generally inadvisable to eject directly over the area you just bombed."

>>507246377
>>507246463
SEXO
COOM COOM

Yes, good sources goy, great work

least obvious IDF posts

>>507240655
>source: brownoid cope

>>507240043 (OP)
No way are they still using AN/AWG-9 and AIM-54 tech so if Tomcats are (big if) responsible it would be interesting to know what they've retrofitted. It's certainly a dangerous airframe.

>>507248245
never seen a F18 do that

>>507276841
>Vought 507 "Vagabond"
Oh wow ! Nice ! Thank you very much, I didn't knew about it at all, even though I knew about the Mirage G with swept wings, but that is a great inception into the program that lead to both design/development... :)

But yeah, I can understand the fact that having an homogenous fleet would be more "money savy" than having an etherogenous one like you described during the Vietnam era for example, but it is just from an accounting pov and not from a tactical/strategic pov...
I would tend to give the benfice of the doubt for the operational pov too, of course, as it means less spares/parts/ different maintenance specs/practices etc, but from a tactical pov, having multiple specialized/ultra-specialized aircrafts; given that the sheer sums of money needed to support them are not a "problem" as the MIC doesn't look away from enormous amounts, and the US usage of printing for their "defense" purposes is not a problem; would be a really better approach I'd say...
At this time, we have a lot of "multirole" A/C, but they need a huge organisation/support to operate accordingly, ie needing a other aircraft aloft in support, wether for radar, air defense or other types...

I understand the evolution of the arms race in Aviation, but the philosophy have changed so much, thinking about it make me understand that it is difficult to compare what was before then now...

PS: To bad the V-507 didn't went to the skies as it is a sweet looking birds...
The story of the Avro Arrow is also one disapointing one...

And as for the Mc Namara thing, I must confess to you that I absolutely don't see what you're refering to... If you have some qrd or link for me to read/learn more about it please ? I mean, I guess what it convey given the context in which you express it but appart from that, I don't know about it...

Picrel is one of my cherished birdy bird ^^'
I find it quite exquisite and operationaly, it endured quite a lot over Africa... ^^

>>507277643
Henlo fren !
Ps: Am taking off to meet SkyKing ;)

>>507280002
Just a little snipet from the Vietnam War era...
The Phantom F4 didn't have any canon at the time because it was the myth of the "end of Dog Fighting Era" due to "missiles era being memed into oblivion" so when they lost quite a few against older generation Migs in DF, they swiftly reassigned canon into the F4s...
I was strucked by that upon learning about it...
You just can over anticipate your "era"
But I must reckon the Missile tech at the time wasn't that neat and to lock a target was a real pain due to a long period of target fixation to launch a "probably hitting" missile...
Not even speaking about avoidance maneuveurs from them...
Just a quick thought re-reading your post ;)

TLDR: 1st gen F4 didn't had onboard Canon...

>>507279573
>AN/AWG-9 and AIM-54 tech
wut

>>507240503
congrats, you fell for the /k/ STEALTH MAKES A JET INVINCIBLE meme

>>507280002
>At this time, we have a lot of "multirole" A/C, but they need a huge organisation/support to operate accordingly, ie needing a other aircraft aloft in support, wether for radar, air defense or other types
Yeah, but even then they are mostly variants for already existing craft, so a lot of mainteneance knowledge, spares is still shared, even then it's easier to have 1 multirole that does bombing/penetration/interception/dogfighting supported by an AWACS than fielding multiple for each and still neede reco on top of that, then you have to factor in time and mainteneance difficulty, during wartime it's easier to jug around just one set of tools and material to fix 1 type of aircraft, have 1 set of mechanics that know every bit of the airframe rather than have to specialize then because you're fielding 2-3 different aircraft, it's just more efficient even if 10-15% possible performance is lost you gain immensely in other ways
>Mc Namara
US Secretary of Defense, big fan of the F-111 and hated the Tomcat from it's inception, he's the reason the original 14A had the TF-30 engines from the F-111B, there's lots of stories about him being a dick to aviation companies, ultimately though it was Cheney, one of his successors to fuck up the Tomcat completely and write off the Advanced Tomcat plans to focus on the Hornet/Super

>>507281251
Yeah the tech just wasn't there at the time but the Phantom in of itself was very ahead of the time, it's primary adversaries were Mig-17s and 19s with a few first gens 21 which were notoriously quite shite due to low engine power and terrible gun, so as long as it was fielded correctly it was quite untouchable due to the (comparably!) much powerful engines and it shows because even in the early war it kept a positive K/D ratio despite all the bad stories surrounding it, i feel like most of the problems of the Phantom's performance were born due to inexperienced crews fielding Mach 2 aircraft, you have to remember that most had just moved in the underpower Mach 1 capable F-100 only 4 years prior, which was still primarly a gun based dogfigther, they had no practical experience with missiles bar the few that transitioned from 106 programs, doubly so with the Navy which went directly from subsonic to supersonic with the 4 and the F-8 Crusader

>>507281587
>during wartime it's easier to jug around just one set of tools and material to fix 1 type of aircraft, have 1 set of mechanics that know every bit of the airframe
Yeah, you're quite right and I totally agree with you on that...
but reading that makes me think about the Mig-29 example were the Russian designed it with its engine to have a life time of around 300hours of operationnal flight during wartime...
It was simpler for them to build/rebuild 29's engines than to have to practice maintenances tasks every few hours of flights...
Plus, their reasoning was that during wartime, a Mig-29 would likely be shot/put out of combat around after 300hours of combat...

It all boils down to scalability and logistics when you think on a larger scale...
So yes, what you said is spot on, but I am still wondering about the Ultra-specialized vs Multirole (albeit various adjusted versions of them) A/C's...

Because there are so much pro's and con's for eachothers, but I might have a little bias for wanting to witness newer designs / disruptive designs like it was the fashion back a few decades ago... ^^'

PS: your picrel has a slighlty ressemblance with the Jaguar, but thanks for sharing one of the first inception of a potential Navy F15 @_@ !

PS: I was about to post the "successor" of the Jaguar, but since you posted a Mariner, here is a pic of the last Super Etandard just before decomission in the French Navy... ;)

REPS: Speaking of "navy", I must reckon your beautifully designed Macchi MC72 with contra rotating propeller for the Schneider Cup...
Once again, something that fade into the void but would really mean something if it was bring back up ;)
Such a beautifull plane... A marvel...

>>507240043 (OP)
Source?

>>507284241
>but thanks for sharing one of the first inception of a potential Navy F15
Actually, it was an F-14 candidate, McDonnell Model 225, basically a swing winged Phantom
>Macchi MC72
Yeah, we had a good aviation industry interwar and during it, but unfortunately we lost and were forced to field the 104 Starfighter for 40 years by the Americans because we were too cheap to get anything good, we only got the 91G out of the cold war while you Frenchies had some very cool Airframes, Mirage 4000, Mirage IV, Nord 1500...

>>507240043 (OP)
Let's go Tom! Uuuhhhhh uh uh danger zone! It's Phoenix time!

>>507282933
Yeah, they went from theory to practice in no time onboard a completly different aircraft as you described...
They perhaps had not enough training prior to deployment, but the fact they reacted so quick to the lack of cannon is something to remember in term of "Agility" from an institutional army... Am wondering wether they'll be able to swiftly adapt today to a challenging situation as they did back then...
But yes also, the Russian were a little bit trailing behind in term of perfs for a while with the 21's lacking power but soon corrected it too... Although they kept the design for a long time and many versions too while the US was trying to disrupt the designs...

PS: Let's revive the Schneider Cup ^_^ ?

>>507243085
What about the giant blowtorch at the back?

>>507285613
> 21's lacking power but soon corrected it too
Yeah, and they kept it in the URSS, unless WW3 started there was no way to see the better Mig-23 variants or the Su-15 in action, but fundamentally the URSS could produce a western equivalent that has 80% of the capability for half the price
>Schneider Cup
Let's use Jets this time

>>507259260
Actually he's correct, due to engine geometry it is possible to reduce visible heat signature to a degree, no way to hide it completely but just enough to increase flare efficiency noticeably

>>507284839
Ah yeah the infamous Death Widow...
Although quite famous aircraft but so tricky to master though...
The F-104 was also a beautifull design but all in all, it's just a Jet engine with enough wing with razor sharp leading edge to be at minimum maneuverable ^^'

>Actually, it was an F-14 candidate, McDonnell Model 225, basically a swing winged Phantom
Oh okay, I might have jumped to quickly onto a web ref then ^^' Thanks for the added infos ! :)

PS: Yeah the Nord 1500 / Grifon was as awkward as slick in someways haha... Let's say a prot F-16 from the 60's ? ^^' lol
Kust jocking but yeah we had kept more aircraft manufacturer than you after the war so that mainly why we had a lot of different airframes...
But the enforcing of US military products onto Euro country they "helped" liberating, enforcing Nato bases etc was something not really awaited from a supposed "ally"... Especially given the way it developp afterwards too...
Thanks to the General De Gaulle for booting them out of France, but they are trying to come back with all their might albeit remaining stealthy to not prompt local population backlash... ie ITAR stuffs etc...

Picrel our peculiar VTOL :)

>>507286178
>URSS could produce a western equivalent that has 80% of the capability for half the price
Yeah, they were terrible for that...
Such marvellous engineers and manufacturers...
Fully focus on operationality, lowest logistic as possible, rough design able to withstand difficult condition such as barely corrrect dirt/grass leveled runways and so more...
Plus the sheer amount of units that could be produced...

>Schneider Cup
>Let's use Jets this time
Well, we'll have to determine a maximum size then... Because as we were speaking about the URSS, they had quite a speedy amphibious low level jet aircraft too lol...
See Picrel ^^'
Sry for overexagerating though ^^'
Let's say I choosed the one with no weapons aboard for racing fair play lol ^^'
But he's really fast though...

Joke aside an amphibious jet for a reknewed Schneider's Cup could be flabergasting... !
And your Sea Dart, thanks for posting it,was a great adventure in design ! I remember watching test run vids ...

F35 are armed with basic interception tools. Most likely there was a single plane and it had an engine error.

>>507287100
>Yeah the Nord 1500 / Grifon was as awkward as slick in someways haha
Yeah, you guys fucked around a lot with weird projects, like the SNCASO Trident
>Thanks to the General De Gaulle for booting them out of France
The brits also had a lot of cool projects, including a few Tomcat clones and an Ace Combat worthy Camera led aircraft, P.125

>>507251594
It was pretty ass until the D variant and by the time it was retired less than half were the D version.

It was basically a giant radar attached to a fast plane. It was OK for what it was intended to do and racked up a bunch of long range kills against poorly trained iraqi pilots in 2nd and 3rd gen aircraft but that was about it.

>>507288448
>SNCASO Trident
Wew... Thanks for reminding me of that bird !
Let's say we had enough of trying to developp better/more efficient/ more powerfull engines and went straight to sticking a Rocket engine in a bird to achieve max speed ^^'
I could picture the meeting where they tried to explain that lool... ^^'
Smthg like:
- But it too much crazy to do...
-Crazy yes, and to do, yes also, we can do it...
-You can do it ?
-Yes we can....
-You crazy mofo can't stop to amaze me with your crazy idea... okay go ahead you have X-months to prove it and then we'll see... ^^'

Something that couldn't happen nowadays though... Because of needed certitudes before launching a project...

>Tomcat clones and an Ace Combat worthy Camera led aircraft, P.125
Regarding that, I absolutely was not aware of any of this...
Your pic might be from Ace Combat, perhaps even basesd from the Brit design you mention I don't know, I must say, I don't really think so because of the overview design, but I'll have a look at the P.125 or British "Tomcat clone"

Ps: Speaking of British sweet design, please just glare at this beautifully crafted Bomber @_@°

The Brits were also so god damn good at designing planes... They were so good at it, it was almost awkward (in a good fashion hehe) ^^'
I won't even speak about the roaring of the Merlin's Engines...
Spitfire (Pun intended from them but so beautifully crafted once again) and Lancasters...

>>507240043 (OP)
Based if true.

I love the F-14 and despise the F-35.

>>507291101
F14 > F35

>>507288448
You might have went on your way through the night already, but let's say that I am greatfull to have stumble upon you to have such a nice conversation here !

I was craving a meaningfull discussion for so long, and you just happened to be one good counterpart !
Cheers to you Italianon !

I promise I won't break my spaghetto in two from now on... LOL ^^'

Jokes aside, Grazie Mille Ragazzi !!!
Attributed Callsign: Macchi

---Sepecat out---

>>507289934
>Your pic might be from Ace Combat
Nope, it was the actual design the brits wanted to go for, a completely enclosed system with a bunch of cameras that let the pilot have a 360 degrees view in all three axis
> but I'll have a look at the P.125 or British "Tomcat clone"
Surprised you don't know about it since it was anglo-french venture, AFVG, pic related
>The Brits were also so god damn good at designing planes...
Yeah, they had lots of good ideas, unfortunately politics struck a lot of them down, mostly due to the notorious "missile paper" of the early 50s which decried aircraft as obsolete, that's why they only had the Harrier till the war with Argentina

>>507247763
cooler cabin too

>>507291612
>You might have went on your way through the night already, but let's say that I am greatfull to have stumble upon you to have such a nice conversation here !
Same, i hope to find you in some other plane thread again Frog, it was good finding another aircraftfag on /pol/ since these threads are usually full of retarded burgers

>>507240503
Dogfights aren't like they are in TV. If fighter on intercept gets behind you, you're probably fucked. Countermeasures like flares only go so far when you've got a pair of machineguns shoved up your ass.

>>507240503
It is absolutely possible. The F35 is not made for dogfighting - it was intended for extreme long range bombing

>>507240503
Probably? Just exceedingly unlikely, could've broke in the air for something as well and the F14 didn't shoot shit down that happens

>>507242167
What would happen of you tried to fly an f14 over Israel?
I wonder why Iran hasn't even tried that.

>>507291946
>Nope, it was the actual design the brits wanted to go for, a completely enclosed system with a bunch of cameras that let the pilot have a 360 degrees view in all three axis
Wow... Really over the edge for their time...
It's actually a thing regarding supersonic passengers aircrafts...
Plus it is exactly what the F-35's developper tried to implement with their special helmet !
Can't beat the old Brit... ^^'

>Surprised you don't know about it since it was anglo-french venture, AFVG, pic related
Well, in all honesty, I didn't knew about it at all... So thanks again very much for sharing it with me ! I'll defly dive into it deeper !
Especially with the upcoming Salon du Bourget next week ;)

> mostly due to the notorious "missile paper" of the early 50s which decried aircraft as obsolete, that's why they only had the Harrier till the war with Argentina
It may even be related to the cannonless 1st gen F4's in Nam... "missile paper thing..."
As for the Harrier... Yeah the Falklands war, after that it wasn't really pushed into warzones... unless sporadically...

But speaking about the Harrier, having in mind our discussion about the URSS...
Let me greet you with one of my fav VTOL URSS Aircraft ;)

>t. flown a Yak_52 ;)

PS: >>507291612 still stand if you went away ;)

>>507270500
>not a Spitfire Mk IX
Shiggy diggy anon

>>507270500
Man they were so peak in the 90s, every cartoon had them it seemed like in at least one episode.

>>507292323
Hehe ! Grazie !
Let's Flogg away onto another plane thread Macchi !

> it was good finding another aircraftfag on /pol/ since...
I couldn't agree more ;)

---Sepecat out---

>>507293200
>F-35's developper tried to implement with their special helmet !
Yeah, the F-35 takes a lot from older projects, as you mention the Yak 141 later in your post, did you know that Yakovlev sold the engine designs to Lockheed back in the 90s to receive more funding to keep the project alive? if you see the engine blocks of both aircraft they are very similiar including the transition between VTOL and Flight mode
>"missile paper thing..."
It was even worse, government directive that said that due to the introduction of long range missiles aircraft had become obsolete since anything could just be shot down via ground based Radar and at best they could just be used as missile carriers, hundreds of projects were shelved due to that and the British Electric Lighting was only allowed as a pre-cautionary measure, but kept vastly underfunded, then when they realized their mistake they quickly bought out the Phantom from the Americans along with the Naval Rotary Gunpod
>flown a Yak 52
I got to sit in a Mig-23 once when i was a kid in Poland so i'd say that one is my favourite aircraft

>>507240199
Guys omg it's just like Top Gun

Why doesn't America just make more f-16s instead of trying to force this stealth fighter shit? The older models seem to be performing well in modern war scenarios. Is it just not possible?

>>507281569
Built for BWC

>>507294182
>if you see the engine blocks of both aircraft they are very similiar including the transition between VTOL and Flight mode
Ah yes the cinematic of the aft engine part was uncanny, and you nailed it with this ref !
I always wondered why/how it was so similar... Speaking about the cinematic of the VTOL/Flight mode as you said ...!
But the fact that Yakovlev sold its design to Lockheed in the 90's... I was totally unaware of it... That's a huge tidbit there ! And so I better understand the similarity now ! Damn... Thank you !!!

>Naval Rotary Gunpod
Ah yeah, I was aware of the "Missile Meme" of the time, being memed into oblivion, "shelving projects" as you apptly said, and yes, before being able to incorporate a Cannon into the F4 airframe, they used a Gunpod/Cannonpod... I guess you were refering to that...
But regarding the British Electric Lightning, I wasn't aware of that... So thanks again !...

>I got to sit in a Mig-23 once when i was a kid in Poland so i'd say that one is my favourite aircraft
That must have been quite a fond memory to recall ! And yes, am found of Aircraft, but the Russian ones hold a special place in my heart too...
Didn't knew it before posting the Flogger Cockpit in reposne to your Flogger Versions pic, but I once had the opportunity to sit into a Mirage 2000C that was at a display stand in Eastern France, also really found memories too so I totally understand your take for the Flogger !!! :)

>>507241017
It's literally the zoomer tranny of aircraft

>>507295290
Im sure the home bound shut in canuck knows more about the modern combat airspace environment than highly trained professionals.

>>507240199
Should have ejected instead of leaving an F-35 to inspect

>>507296113
Based. Crawling all over the general dynamics f111, including about half an hour in the big analog simulator they used for diff aspects of crew training, that was great fun ss a 13yr old

For me it's the F-18 super hornet

>>507296421
>highly trained professionals
Highly trained in taking bribes

>>507296569
Yeah, the Raven (EW) or Aardwark, what a nice aircraft too !
Cold War era planes were top kino all around, you must have had a blast touring it and experiencing the sim too !
Especially if you were as young !

Cherish those memories mate !
You'll forever be able to roam around/inside and feel like you fly it too with a little bit of imagination !
Vids can help too eventually ;)

Cheers Amerifren !
>>507294182
>I got to sit in a Mig-23 once when i was a kid in Poland so i'd say that one is my favourite aircraft

>>507296569
>>507294182

Added pic too for good measure ;)

>>507240884
>evidence
what would you consider "evidence"?

>>507242282
Remember that half the white population has an IQ below 100. All other races are even more stupid.

Bump for a good thread to help it Staying Alive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNFzfwLM72c

>>507246377

the need to trans his ass then give him back as Schlomomi

FIRST PHOTO

This is now a historical image thread, F-14 edition.

>>507240043 (OP)
This is a Spanish armada moment. The American empire is finished. China won.

>>507301724
Fuck off with your AI generated slop garbage F-16 x F/A-18 x JF-17 hybrid and photoshopped roundel on the wrong part of the air frame.

Even Maverick (from Top Gun) is too scared to fly an F-35

>>507301724
Fucking lame ass AI_Photo_Imagery.... Lol...LMAO even... pouahahaha....

>>507301763
That's some good pic hell yeah !!!
Good Ol Koweit_time innit ? ^^'

>>507301861
>f16 dual engines
>image has one
I can't tell if you do on purpose or not.

>>507302005
It’s real.

>>507301724
>FIRST PHOTO

>>507302106
Anon... I am going to give you an out by asking if you mistook the F-16 for the F-15.
Pic related is an F-16. (in a very lovely paint scheme)

>>507302246
>single tail fin
>image has two
LMAO. Absolute seething.

>>507292201
"May i kill the children" would be rightly to say for you.

>>507302313
Let me clarify the three aircraft I mentioned it being an AI hybrid of. It has an F-16 fuselage, an F/A-18 tail, and JF-17 cockpit and nose. Not to mention the terribly shopped roundel on, again, the wrong part of the airframe.
For reference, pic related are Israeli F-35s. Note that the flat area around the rear area around the tail in that pic doesn't exist on the actual aircraft.
(I will continue to take your bait for the sake of any newfrens in this thread who might've been fooled)

>>507240503
Serbia shot down an F117 so yes miracles can happen.

AWOOO!!! ~~~~~Tomcat waifu

>>507240503
>>507302696
The whole point of the F-14 was to have a big airframe with a lot of power so it could carry any missile it wants no matter how big and could carry whatever radar you could want to put into it, so I could totally believe one with an upgraded Russian/Chinese radar and missiles could have a chance to hit an F-35. The F-14 is much faster than it after all so it could catch up.

>>507240043 (OP)
fake news kill yourself shitskin

>>507303165
What a horrendously vague post, how much you wanna bet this kike is just going through the front page replying to every OP with the same image and message without opening the thread.

This is the last one I have of the F-14 in my historical folder. :(

>>507242167
The fighter jet you posted looks like it is leaking hydraulic fluid

>>507240043 (OP)
DANGER ZOOOONE

>>507302688
If "Power Stance" needed a definition...
That would be it, full on... !

Cheers for posting that wrecking pic "GBU Id'ed" Paveway_Fren ;)

>>507302856
That's a slick stack over there gee... !!!
Efin Saved HON HON HON HON !!!

507303028
Oh... Nostalgia about to kick in... ^^'

507303112
Dam sweet pic !!!

>>507303168
Extrado missile rails ? or laminar flow canalisations ?
Great pic nonetheless even thoug it looks like a mock up with the exhaust covers...!

>>507303407
That one !!! DAMN !!!!
PS you can continue to post em !
You choose them so good !

Keep up the good work Amerifren !!!
Cheers

>>507246463
>>507246377
>Israeli pilot captured
Toll status?

>>507304097
The pic with the odd rails and fins was the first prototype of the F-14 so it probably had all sorts of strange things on it. I ran out of F-14 pictures but I can find some more unrelated images in the ol' historical folder.
Side note, an image with the F-14, Mirage, and the KC-10? Saved.

>>507241561
yeah. probably jews spamming false stuff again

Seems the French stuff in my folder is few and far between.

>>507296113
Russian landing gear moggs all others

One of my favorite designs of all time. Very forward thinking, I just wish we could have seen the flight performance with the jet engine it was designed for.

The F-14 is the goat.
I don't give a shit if "the bad guys" have them now.
I love the F-14 and I'll stand by whoever has the most of them.
We should build more. Fucking jew politicians need muh tax dollars so they can pretend their bill updated the military and they did their job so they can keep sitting at a desk doing nothing. Fucking faggots.
That said, fuck jews, fuck muslims, fuck the talmud, I hate the anti-christ. All must kneel before Christ the Lord of All.

>>507305332
Dangerously based. American companies can't make new aircraft designs ever since they all merged into each other after the cold war ended.

What would Jack Northrop say if he saw the state of military aircraft in 2025.

Am I posting these into the void?

>>507303276
shit skins arent people
kill all shitskins word wide bro
if kikes get this shit done, all for it

>>507306893
This is now a historical vehicle/aircraft/image appreciation thread. Brownoids are unable to appreciate the engineering that goes into these wonderful machines.