Thread 507282386

Thoughts on police using drones to scan the streets looking for crime and taking away your privacy?

video here

https://old.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/1l9lnqf/man_with_drone_gets_a_young_drug_dealer_arrested/

>>507282476
I'm not going to reddit you fat faggot
Kys

>>507282386 (OP)
Are you sure is wasn't watching the negro climbing the fence?

>>507282386 (OP)
It is not illegal because there is no expectation of privacy outdoors and in public spaces

>>507282588
I don't know how to download the video and make into a webm to post here. It's pretty neat so it's worth a watch.

>>507282386 (OP)
its all brown people. dont give a fuck
https://youtu.be/fnMFZELu7o8

>>507282782
>It is not illegal because there is no expectation of privacy outdoors and in public spaces

>>507282782
so you're fine with armies of drones patrolling the streets 24/7?

>>507282386 (OP)
Drones should be completely illegal, even the (((government))) should be forbidden from using them.

Use drones to sell drugs. Problem solved.

>>507282386 (OP)
there is no expectation of privacy in public
I could do the same thing. they still are under FAA reg though, kind of

>>507282386 (OP)
Is that a nigger in a cage?

>>507282386 (OP)
I'm okay with it. I have nothing to hide.

>>507282386 (OP)
Seems like this will disproportionately impact POC

great fucking enroll a totalitarian galf like ststem, lovely


just do what your told

>>507283078
>there is no expectation of privacy in public
So you won't mind if a drone is right next to your house and watching your underage daughters swimming in your pool then?

>>507282782
this

Anyone, government or private citizen, is freely allowed to record whatever the fuck they want in public space

It's called freedom chuds, get on with it. Keep pushing these stupid "you can't record what I don't like laws", and next women will be petitioning so only chads and themselves can take pictures outside, otherwise women are in danger of "creeps" (guys they don't find sexually attractive) taking pictures of them, and a lot more typical woman bullshit

Don't do a crime in public, or when breaking in someone's property as he should have recording software too, if you don't want to be recorded doign a crime

>>507282893
lol
it's coming anyway. I saw some alarming new tech in LA, like real time stitching of multiple video feed. Basically Sim City God's eye shit.

>>507282386 (OP)
All for it. We need to crackdown brutality if we’re ever going to have a high trust society.

>>507283268
that isn't considered public
this is as old as the camera. they just fly now

>>507282386 (OP)
If police tracking cars without a warrant or collecting cell phone records without a warrant are illegal according to the 4th amendment then I think looking for crime using a drone would also fall into it being illegal. Especially when piggers would use it just to look for crime. But all the piggers have to say is they had suspicion that there was a crime happening and wanted to covertly investigate and they could shuffle out of it legally. Would be on defense to challenge the timeline and force the prosecution to provide evidence that they had suspicion of the crime prior to using a drone. But considering cops can say I thought I smelled weed and have a free pass to search a vehicle or arrest you then that could easily be lied about. Best method would be for the public to lobby that drone usage, or any electronic surveillance really, must have some paper trail for approval and refuse any bullshit of I thought there may be a crime from driving by.

>>507283403
>that isn't considered public
but it's technically on the street so it has a right to be there and if you can see it from the street then it's fair game according to you

>>507283268
they're not going to waste their time watching citizens in their residences unless there's a reason to.

>>507283523
It's settled case law here. basically, you can't put a ladder on a sidewalk and peep, but you can stand and look through the front windows all day

>>507282386 (OP)
>Thoughts on police using drones to scan the streets looking for crime and taking away your privacy?
Dark Angel predicted this

>>507282793
Fucking Google it, it's that's simple, "reddit video to MP4", plenty of web rippers for idiots like you

>>507282386 (OP)
>Thoughts on police using drones to scan the streets looking for crime and taking away your privacy?

>>507282386 (OP)
land of the free lmao

>>507283523
I'd bet the definition of public changes a bit though, for the worse

>>507283403
>old as the camera
This.
Hovering camera vs fixed camera.

>>507283069
>Use drones to sell drugs. Problem solved.
Does the drone get arrested if it is controlled by AI or do they arrest the AI?

Asking for a fren.

>>507282588
stfu pig, could you possibly be any more fucking obvious?

>>507284025
exactly
Waring neighbors figured it out long ago

>>507283910
>Just download 3rd party software that will give you malware just so I can save a click

>>507282386 (OP)
I was actually thinking about sending a bunch of drones up 24/7 above the worst neighborhoods arpunf me and then hoarding all the murder footage that I can get my hands on and only giving it to law enforcement for review for an extremely steep price. And sometimes I just simply wouldn't give then it if I didn't feel like it because the victim was a non white, or the murderer was white etc

>>507283320
Having big daddy government over your shoulder and in the room at every moment is not high trust, it's not even trust. It's sheer terror that (((they))) will come for you at any moment, because they will.

>>507283965
in the video the criminal is trying to throw rocks at the drone to destroy it lmao

>>507283276
>another obvious pigshill on 4pol

>>507284258
>in the video the criminal is trying to throw rocks at the drone to destroy it lmao
That's some monkey brain sheeeeit right there.

>>507282386 (OP)
imagine how much better life would be for every single American if we could have all the money spent on protecting ourself from black crime and catching black criminals

Fuck the Jews

Death to Israel

Epstein Ain't Muslim

Ghislaine Maxwell Ain't Iranian

Palestinians in Palestine =/= Pakis in London

Name All Hasbarabarians

Sage Hasbara Threads

Free America, Free Palestine, Free Europa

River to Sea

From Atlantic to Pacific, Baltic to Mediterranean Sea

Sea to Shining Sea

T K D, for You and Me

PERSIA AND EUROPA UNITED

HAIL ARYAN VICTORY

>>507283268
>watching your underage daughters swimming
More likely she's getting impregnated by Jamal

>>507283268
in the states of Texas and Florida you are allowed to shoot at those toy drones if they are over your property. not sure about other states

>>507282386 (OP)
You have zero expectation of privacy in public.

>>507284744
Yeah but what if they're not actually over your property? That's what I'm saying, they could be watching you while still being "on the streets" but because of how high they are they can still easily watch over everyone.

shit in america is gunna change so fast. they will be everywhere, making deliveries, shooting perps, all kinds of stuff. beyond line of sight and the 250gm rule is going out, big ass drones delivering groceries is in


The Order directs the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to expand drone operations by enabling routine “Beyond Visual Line of Sight” drone operations for commercial and public safety missions, and to accelerate the development, testing, and scaling of American drone technologies, including advanced air mobility and autonomous operations.
The Order establishes an electric “Vertical Takeoff and Landing” integration pilot program to accelerate the deployment of safe and lawful vertical operations in the United States, selecting at least five pilot projects to advance applications like cargo transport and medical response.
It directs the FAA Administrator to deploy artificial intelligence (AI) tools to streamline and expedite UAS waiver reviews.
The Order directs the FAA Administrator to publish an updated roadmap for the integration of civil UAS into the National Airspace System.
It strengthens the domestic drone industrial base by prioritizing U.S.-manufactured UAS, promoting their export and taking action to ensure our technology remains secure from undue foreign influence and exploitation.
It enhances global competitiveness by streamlining regulations, expanding market access, and utilizing federal financing tools.
The Order supports the warfighter by expanding access to U.S.-manufactured high-performing drones while streamlining airspace and spectrum access.

>>507284119
>shilling reddit
You're the fat faggot bro

>>507284808
>in public.
America needs more cameras.
They're great entertainment.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucnD0IJnnv0

>>507284744
what happens if you miss and hit someone else?

Thoughts on the Canadian criminal justice system giving dangerous offenders a slap on the wrist sentence like probation?
Police might do a good job but it's all for nothing.

They are using actual real birds from taxidermists now to make drones to spy on people in Denver.

>>507282782
Actually, it's illegal for the government to follow you around to see if you're committing crimes without cause. All traffic cameras and the like should be removed.

>>507284906
>could be watching you
It's surprising how many welcome Big Brother.

>>507285251
helicopters probably have set that precedence by now. and cameras

I'm more concerned about taking a massive carbon fiber drone to the head at 150mph

>>507282386 (OP)
You have ZERO privacy rights in public.

>>507282386 (OP)
>streets
>privacy
You a dumb hoe.

>>507285130
>real birds from taxidermists
There are no real birds

>>507284906
>because of how high they are they can still easily watch over everyone
they will. and AI will watch it all, send robot troops when they see crime, or a hunter killer drone for the headshot. it's coming, so don't be bad outside

>>507282386 (OP)
nah homie this shit be racsis

>>507285791
Shush. Stop noticing.

>>507285545
>>507285686
0 privacy in public isn't meant to be literal. You can't follow someone around.

>>507285307
>>507285812
Another thing is that above a certain height it's not considered your property anymore so they could just fly above that with high-zoom lenses or whatever.

>>507282386 (OP)
It's creepy and scary. Total 1985 state.

>>507282386 (OP)
AP had some drones over LA that were way more terrifying. Cops couldn't afford that kind of tech. AI enhanced and stiched God's eye shit, man.

>>507286181
I'd bet the law is already established in ways. LA has had 8 choppers overhead since the 90s
drones can loiter forever, cost nothing, use AI and shotrackers to spot crime... it's gunna get matrix like

>>507286181
my town, most towns, drones have to stay pretty low, like 0-400 feet. mostly 50 in populated areas, 200 most common, even under 250g
lot of regs here, but Trump is lifting them for Amazon and commerce

>>507285924
>0 privacy
It takes just one simple hack

>>507282386 (OP)
stalkermaxxers here have been doing this for over a decade, could open up new job opportunities for us

>>507286971
don't tell the thugs

The have 24/7 hovering drones rotated out on shifts always flying above many major cities, with technology developed for countering the Iraq insurgency that tracks most people and vehicles in the picture spanning multiple city blocks for years.
Now ai is integrating license plate scanners and facial recognition.
Eventualy this combined with street and traffic cameras. Will watch most public spaces. Once it gets effective enough government will become pettier in what they enforce as they fear the population less and can control more effectively.

But your car, phone, computer, smart tv/fridge/washer/ and most electronics with wireless will also be watching you with ai indoors.

Of course they still won't be able to do anything about your replacement by immigrants, but will fine you into homelessness if you don't be a good slave.

>>507285540
Quadcopter drones are stupid dangerous. If a single motor goes out it turns into a spiraling rock dropping from the sky.
This is unlike planes that could at least try to glide somewhere.
A lot more orheavier ones in the sky will mean a lot more property damage and serious injuries. It shouldn't be considered okay to hover things above people that will eventualy fall and hurt them. Or fly above them relying on some anonymous operator not to maim someone.
Start putting a lot in the air and accidents will get common.

The big corporations will probably stop using big ones for packages and petty stuff when the resulting lawsuits from property damage cost more than they ever saved by using them.

>>507282386 (OP)
In Baltimore they really did this with spy planes. It was ruled unconstitutional so they were forced to stop the program. It was a very effective system, they could track you all over the city if they knew you were wearing say an orange shirt

https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/federal-appeals-court-rules-baltimore-aerial-surveillance-program-unconstitutional

>>507282476
>man with drone
>police

>>507283403
>filming someone's backyard
That's not public

>>507287313
the large ones will have to have failsafes like a parachute. FAA is trying to figure it all out. I have pic and it's heavy, fast, and sharp AF carbon knives. not legal in town, or near people, under 400 ft and line of sight. could go a long ways though, and "flyoffs" are common

>>507287750
true?

>>507287750
Filming someone's backyard from the public street is considered legal in some places though.

>>507284744
>in the states of Texas and Florida you are allowed to shoot
Any rules on what I can shoot at it?

>>507288201
>in some
In the USA at least that some is incredibly small. I know for my state and most states you can't set up camera on your property and aim it at an area on private property that isn't visible from public (i.e. backyards, inside windows, etc).

Is it Illegal to Record Someone Without Their Consent While in Public?

The simple answer to this question is: no. When you are in a public setting such as a concert, grocery store, a park, and many others, recordings are permitted. The primary motivator for recording in these types of atmospheres is to ensure safety and enhanced security. Once you leave your private property, you should not be expecting full privacy. Thus, recording in appropriate settings when in public is permitted. However, even in public, there are certain places with expected levels of privacy where recording is not allowed, such as bathrooms and dressing rooms.
Is it Illegal to Record Someone Without Their Consent While in Private?

While outside of the public eye, there is an expected level of privacy, making it illegal to record someone without their permission in some circumstances. If you are on personal property, it is up to the owner’s discretion if photos and videos are allowed. If the owner forbids pictures and videos, and you decide to take or record them anyway, you may be told to leave the property or even arrested for disobeying the owner’s requests.

>>507288811
None of these explanations address the situation being discussed. It's illegal to film someone inside their residence from the public if they have a reasonable expectation of privacy; a backyard that is fenced off by non-transparent barriers means there is an expectation of privacy.

>>507289391
>illegal to film someone inside their residence
What if the blinds are open?

>>507283069
lol my homie was doing this like 8-9 years ago when drones first started to pop off

kill ALL cops

>>507288413
probably not that

>>507290016
Then you don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/expectation_of_privacy

>>507282875
It's amazing how these fucking fagots always probably boast "recording you isn't illegal you're in public you have no expectation of privacy in public" as if oblivious to the fact that they have no rights to privacy and are actually proud of it in their Homeland.

>filming into a house is illegal
>women put windows over their showers
Aren't there laws re 'attractive nuisance'

>>507288413
>Any rules on what I can shoot at it?
If you own it or have permission to choot it, then whatever you want.

>>507291373
>>filming into a house is illegal
Says who?
You can stand on the street and film. If their curtains are open, it's on them, not the viewer.

>>507282386 (OP)
They have to do this or the nonwhite trash wouldn't be able to move about freely in the West without getting disappeared by whites.
1970s was probably last decade could drive around and blow away nonwhites. The cameras were not setup everywhere back then.
Now the nonwhite trash can feel reasonably secure they won't get attacked, and even if they do the cameras will catch it afterwards to deter any white heroes.
An example of technology not working out in White's favor.