>>507359369>>>507358980>>LARPer doesn’t realize that nukes have to be maintained since fissionables degrade over timeWrong, dipshit.
"fissionables" do not radioactivly degrade fast enough to be relevant in a human or many human's lifespan.
What happens is this:
USA thinks it's hot shit and "super tech" in the 60s, 70s,
Standardizes on a pit that is close to the edge of usability.
Forgets that plutonium isn't a magic substance only: it's also an element
And can chemically degrade (oxidize, etc).
It oxidizes. Now your 3mm of Plutonium is ... not 3mm anymore.
That's why
Russia uses more fissile material for instance.
USA could too.
As for the tritum booster gas: It was your volitional choice to build nuclear weapons that required the in-pit tritum to boost criticality. That was your design decision.
>But Castle-Bravo derived weapons were 15 tons! Our 300kt devices are only 2ft long and 80lbs!Yes but they won't work forever, while some of the solid lithum ancestors of castle-bravo would have lasted forever if you didn't dismantle them.
As long as the neutron gun kept working.
>>507368537>Our nukes are falling apart. If they are maintained the quality decreases each time. At least half of them would fail to explode at best.Solid pits don't have that problem.
But you white* fucks turned against solid pits about the same time you turned against men having cute little girl child brides worldwide
>*(by definition anyone that likes cute young virgin girls is not-white, according to whites here on 4chan's pol who hate anime and love Jesus and his millstone and chopping off dicks (matthew 19, greek),[which is the opposite of YHWH's law: who allows child brides including in cases of rape (tahphas: to take (as to take a city)) (and yes, na'ar means child+in the ancient archaic hebrew of devarim, that is why later in time, the name for the boy-assasins that israel used many centuries later were called na'arim : they were "like children": but killers)+padia/puella]