>>507449366 (OP) why da u.s. need to get on dat metric system frfr:
>1. errybody else on it why we ain? da whole globe rockin w metric n we out here stuck on inches n feet like its 1776. if we switched up tradin sciencin n jus talkin to otha countries would be way smootha. like all dem big-brain scientists already usin metric, why we gotta be different?
>2. dis mad too easy why we makin it hard? metric straight-up simple. errythang base-10, no weird 12 inches in a foot or 16 ounces in a pound. a kilo? das 1000 grams. a liter? 1000 milliliters. no stress no guessin jus clean math.
>3. futcha-proof da kids let em eat! da world ain gettin less connected. if we switch now da youngins grow up fluent in wut errybody else usin. mo opportunities less confusion, let em cook on a global scale.
>4. schools need to stop playin. teach da babies metric early n dey won be out here strugglin tryna convert miles to kilometers like its sum ancient cipher. universal units = universal bag.
but hold up… why folks might not wanna switch:
>1. dis gon cost a bag n a half. we talkin new road signs new tools new errythang. u know how much bread it take to flip a whole countrys measurement system? plus folks gotta relearn stuff, ain nobody got time fo dat.
>2. “but dis how we been doin it!” folks attached to dey feet pounds n gallons. its like tryna take grandmas cast-iron skillet, she ain lettin go. plus construcshun cookin all dat? people used to imperial n change don come easy.
>3. messing up da money. sum industries deep in da u.s. market, why dey gotta switch if dey gettin money already? n regular folks? dey ain tryna see liters at da gas pump or grams in dey recipes. too much work.
>4. we kinda halfway dere anyway. doctors usin milliliters cars got metric specs soda bottles got liters n ounces. so do we really need a full switch or we good jus slidin where it make sense?