Why did men turn women from traditional ones on the left into whores seen on the right ?

>>507456470 (OP)

>>507456470 (OP)

>>507456530
Christianity allowed it too

>>507456530
>>507456470 (OP)
Head coverings habibi? That is a MUSLIM trait, you easterners were under Turkish yoke so hard you learned from them HAHAHAAH

Because men are dumb apes and fell for the "if women have freedom you, the regular Joe, would be able to sleep with many women!"
Of course, only the top 1% of men could do that, the rest are destined for inceldom or sleeping with and marrying mediocre women with countless tons of baggage and previous partners.

>>507456470 (OP)
We were born in the weak men create hard time phase.
Just wait for the Gen Alpha chuds to grow up to see what they will do with women rights

>>507456470 (OP)

Women did that to themselves. When men were in charge women didn't dress like whores. This is the feminist future they chose. Fucking 1000 men in a day for Only Fans fame.

We told women they could be whatever they wanted and they wanted to be whores.

>>507456773
So basically because “jews told them to and they slavishly obeyed”

>>507456956
>jooos

>>507456470 (OP)
Left pic is when they are grown up 25 year old.

>>507456879
No, women simply respond to their nature.
This is men fault to have let it happen.

>>507456879
but still you get no sex. tragic.

>>507456879
>When men were in charge
but who decided that men are no longer in charge?

>>507456470 (OP)
>youth and attractiveness BAD

>>507456530
They look so young now.

>>507457058
Why are you posting a picture of my wife?

>>507456470 (OP)
>Why did men turn women from traditional ones on the left into whores seen on the right ?
It's typical white cuckoldry masked as women rights + masculinity crisis + availability of BBC.
Those girls on the right are HUGE BBC sluts and you know it, Timmy.

>>507456470 (OP)
Another woman post? On 4chan /pol/? Hey guys whats the purpose of /r9k/ again?

>>507456530
>>507457168
Was meant for >>507456470 (OP)

>>507456470 (OP)
By not killing them often enough it’s that simple

>>507456470 (OP)
W*men have always been whores, just consult any mythology or notable philosophical work throughout history for contemporary evidence. Their nature hasn't changed since the last ice age.
The civilization will unironically collapse unless their "rights" are taken away again.

>>507456470 (OP)
because men gave women rights and women choose short term gratification

>>507456708
all women in christendom covered their heads until the 20th century
there's a reason bonnet is a word in the english language

>>507456879
>Women did that to themselves
It's men who allowed it because they wanted to see their daughters and wives as whores / pure sex objects

>>507456470 (OP)
The sad truth that /pol/ either won't admit or hasn't realised is that this benefits the top tier of men who now have a "roster" of women who they sleep with this change was only negative to middle and low tier males

>>507457477
because those men obeyed whore women, they are cucks

>>507456470 (OP)
That cellulite on the right..

The ass on the girl in white, my god…

>>507457608
yes the problem is hard to untangle, the few men with the most power have harems of women and narcissistic attention whore women have harems of men for money or validation/sex. I’ve met girls in open relationships with their cuck boyfriend and harems of men as well. They are not evil but they are attention whores. Whore men, only the most powerful, and narcissistic whore women and the simp men that fuel them and the powerful men that manipulate those slave simp men. Difficult problem to untangle.

>>507457010
Not an argument. Jews are objectively in power and are the architects of modern society. Go run cover for evil elsewhere.

>>507457608
>this change was only negative to middle and low tier males
That's not true. Even the men at the top lose with this social arrangement.
They can bang many women, but everyone including themselves lose the ability to have loyal virgin wives. Which makes forming a stable family nigh impossible.
One day after years of fucking sluts they'll realize it's a waste of time, and they'll want to have children and a family, and they won't be able to.
No woman that's been riding the cock carousel and lived the Instagram lifestyle (clubbing, traveling, etc) will ever be able to stay happy with the simple life of raising a family.

Some illiterate goat herder in Afghanistan has access to better quality women for marriage than literal BILLIONAIRES in the West.
Everyone loses. The men at the top and everyone else. Even the women themselves since they'll end up alone once they're not attractive and men won't want to marry that used trash.

>>507457477
>dyke tattoo
>husband

>>507456470 (OP)
If girls dress like that it should be legal for men to rape them.

>>507456470 (OP)
because jews made it their life mission to destroy europe society because of holocaust that didnt happen 100 years ago, kalergi plan, white genocide, jealousness, you name it

>>507458400
Based muzzie.. There is no other way to fix society other than to physically alter women in public for such behavior.

>>507456530
Based Iranian Military if true.
Too bad their performance has been... underwhelming...

>>507458264
The high tier men still have access to suitable wives they just now string along roasties for years while getting sexual gratification from them

>>507456470 (OP)
I deliberately became a loser neet so that women have one less good man available on the dating market. I wasted away all my potential for the sole purpose of becoming a burden on wagies finances and women's need for emotional intimacy and a steady provider.
No one exploits my time and energy, that is solely reserved for shitposting and substance abuse.
If you haven't taken the neetpill, you don't understand game theory.

>>507459162
>The high tier men still have access to suitable wives
No, they don't. Almost all girls aren't virgins by the time they're 18, unless they have some major defect or disfigurement. Non-virgins aren't suitable wives.
Even billionaires, celebrities and extremely good-looking men are not capable of finding a well-raised young loyal virgin from a good family.
You can only claim they have access to "suitable wives" by lowering these standards into the ground. That's why the marriage and divorce rates are what they are.

In a patriarchal society even the lowest of men has access to quality wives (if he can support them). In a gynocentric society, everyone loses.

>>507458264
>>507459162
To back what I am saying up the divorce rate amongst millennials is low and so is the marriage rate, why? Because women now have greater agency in their marriage compare that to boomers who have the highest divorce rate their agency in marriage was impacted by society more than anything and I don't just mean societal standards I mean the fact that women having jobs wasn't the norm and those that did were employed in low wage jobs and were legally allowed to be paid less than men so it was a necessity for a woman to marry back then which is why when their kids grew up boomers divorced en masse because in most cases they never really wanted to marry that person which is reflected in the in divorce rates

>>507459578
>Non-virgins aren't suitable wives.
Sorry to break it to you but not everybody cares about virginity the way you do a high tier spouse won't be a whore but it doesn't mean she has to be a virgin for high tier men those standards don't exist but you can still have a loyal loving wife who will take on the traditional role
>That's why the marriage and divorce rates are what they are.
See >>507459655

>>507456470 (OP)
>60 yo grandmas
>18 yo girls
kek what a jew strawman post

>>507459834
Now you're just coping. Or you're a delusional woman. Pair-bonding gets weaker and weaker after every partner.
The ideal number of previous partners for a bride is zero, and all men deep down know it.

>it doesn't mean she has to be a virgin for high tier men those standards don't exist
They don't have those standards because they can't afford to have them. There simply is no supply.
If men had a choice they aboslutely would prefer a young virgin over a used up woman.
Which is why this standard exists in every patriarchal society remaining in the world today.

> you can still have a loyal loving wife who will take on the traditional role
No. The more partners she's had the more unstable the marriage will be.
That's why innocence has been so prized in every patriarchal society that has existed in human history.

>>507456470 (OP)
In Middle Ages they had sex festivals in villages where even priests would fuck women, and in towns people would dress up as women,it only happened once or twice per year but it did happen.
In Lithuania they had some tradition that everyone would put their dick in a barrel with sour cucumbers and then everyone would suck the cock off.

>>507457608
the problem is that whoring around is destructive to the society as whole, with the falling birthrates to boot
a "top tier" man with a stable of women won't have children with them
decreasing the amount of children
low tier men/women should not breed anyway, thats dysgenic and leads to a MENA / india situation
but middle tier women wanting top-tier men instead of their own middle-tier, that is a problem

not to mention that kikes are promoting miscegenation and onlyfans to women as better life option than motherhood, and then replacing the decreasing White population with non-whites, destroying White societies

motherhood should be honored, and whoring shunned. ultimately women do what society expects of them, and its our fault as men that we allow jews to live and poison their minds, set the societal expectations to whoring

had the WWII turned out with good guys on top, we'd have things like this
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_of_Honour_of_the_German_Mother

and zero-interest housing loans for families, with 20% of the loan forgiven for each child, heavily incentivizing to have children

>>507456470 (OP)
Do these girls have fathers?

>>507460828
no but they have daddies

>>507460678
Your stats don't even include women under 30 and is years old because I've seen it many times so it doesn't even include millennials

>>507456470 (OP)
Because men allowed it to happen. Notice how women don't act or dress like whores in Afghanistan? Wonder why that is...

>>507460808
I fully agree but there are plenty of men who are quite fine with how society is and plenty of low tier men are too because of the false belief that these women will have sex with them this is can be seen in the form fn men giving millions to chat to these whores on OF which is where they make their largest amount of money or to some e-girl streamer the only thing that is enabling this is men

>>507456470 (OP)
Ones on the left are old and thus not sexually attractive. What is my prize for the goodest answer?

>>507456470 (OP)
>the human body is EVIL
Don't you need to be Jewish somewhere else?

>>507456708
Who is the ugly guy in the pic? Looks finnish

>>507456470 (OP)
Compare and contrast.
You skipped school the day they taught it.
Comparing grandmas to teenagers. You're stupid.

>>507460487
18 year old girls dressed just like grandmas just 50 years ago.
Now they dress like whores.