Thread 507594696

How is this possible?
Is there a chance we've been lied to regarding WW2 and relatively recent history?

>>507594696 (OP)
lol

a holocaust survivor could have been 2 years old in 1945. a soldier would have been like 20

>>507594958
jews born after WW2 are considered "holocaust survivors" because of generational trauma

>>507594696 (OP)
there were babies in the camps. no baby soldiers though except at the end when hitler sent 4 year olds to die instead of going himself but theyre not counted as soldiers today.

>>507595120
Don't be retarded. Babies and toddlers who were in the camps are considered survivors. The 17 year difference between a baby and a solider accounts for the difference. Let alone if you look back in 2000 there were 5.1 million WW2 soldiers still alive and now it's just 20k. Over the next 10 years that 220k is gonna be down to 15k.

>>507595463
Why did the nazis allow childbirth of Jews if they were working for the final solution?

The thing that gets me about this holocaust thing is that the number shouldn't matter at all. They really give away the game w\ how they treat this topic. The fine print is unimportant. If you want to tell me that hitler and the nazis mistreated the jews... ok. I literally do not need any more information than that, and in fact, my brain rejects any more information. It's unimportant. It could have been 5000, and the story is still the same.

I don't even know the textbook definition they're using although it seems that the 6 million number is crucial, and then it sounds like you have to believe that all or most were gassed, and then incinerated, which is where a lot of so called holocaust denial comes in to play since people point to how unlikely it would be to be able to burn all those bodies, and the sheer logistics.

This is why it's illegal in some places to talk about it. The story falls apart so quickly. I saw someone on here post an infographic talking about how the US did exactly the same thing w\ the japanese so that we wouldn't have an army of people loyal to an adversary country running amok. The only difference was that the United States was not being bombed to shit by the rest of the world, and thus was able to properly feed these prisoners. And then it's easy to see how they've weaponized the narrative they created.

Any time a jew does something beyond the pale, they trot out "the holocaust". Any discussion not going their way? trot out the "holocaust". Pretty clever to create a sob story so terrible that anyone questioning it can be labeled a "nazi" and then convince people to hate them and disregard what they say.

All anyone really needs to do is look at bibi netanyahu. HE, is a nazi. Bibi is "literally hitler".

>>507594696 (OP)
It's spelled 'lolocaust' for a reason.

'Holocaust survivor" is pretty broad term - it might just mean the person was born in Germany or Eastern Europe during WW2 and lived in a jewish ghetto.

It's easy to imagine how a 3 year old that was nowhere near a concentration camp could be alive 75 years later when comparing it to the german veterans who were already in their 20s by the end of the war.

There's also the possibility that ChatGPT is telling you the number of jews that survived the concetration camps, and tnot the number of still living survivors since AI can be dumb.

>>507595463
Why would a baby survive a holocaust? Who was taking care of the Jewish baby after the parents were ovened?

Holocaust survivors would have been like any children at the time in any of the Nazi or Italy controlled areas. A kid in Vichy France would have counted.

>>507595368
>>507595463
>>507595639
>thinking babies could survive the Zyklon
ngmi

>>507596729
Okay but why would a child survive an extermination camp?

>>507596729
Why does every pre-WWII encyclopedia say there were at most 5-6million jews in all of Europe? How badly was the population undercounted in your opinion?

>>507594696 (OP)
Not that I beleive in these numbers but you have to be a retard to not understand that children didn't fight in ww2 but were in concentration camps.

>>507594696 (OP)
Unfortunately, the Jewish idea of "generational trauma" has made it so that even jews born in 3072 will be considered "Holocaust survivors." I won't be alive to say "I told you so," but Mark my words, there will be WWII Jewish Holocaust survivors for generations to come yet.

>>507598229
if you had ever interacted with the german bureaucracy you'd know. it's more surprising they ever got started

>>507595692
You are trying to bring logic and empathy to a topic where the goal isn’t to relay truth, but to subjugate the listener and force the listener to morally submit to the teller.

>>507595463
Ok, but how many children did they have in those camps then if the number is about ten times the size of let's say the veterans (which could have been as young as 15 to be fair. 17 was the usual age to be drafted toward the end of the war.)

>>507595120
Jews born after world war 2 are included because it was real in their mind

>>507598956
this. never stop telling the truth.