Thread 507697057

Why is incest wrong?
Isn't it okay as long as it is not repeated for generations?

It's objectively less destructive to the gene pool than miscegenation.

Your bloodline's IQ gets tanked, not worth

>>507697057 (OP)
>Why is incest wrong?
Power imbalance, grooming - as clearly demonstrated in your article

>>507697057 (OP)
As it turn out, people of all races all around the world are already having sex with their close relatives.
It was all kept in the dark because of social stigma and media propaganda against it.

>>507697057 (OP)
You never had sister, are you?
Whole discourse is pointless, since that those who have sisters never ask that question in a first place (Westermarck effect, step-siblings do not count as an incest). While those who ask do not have oportunity in a first place

>>507698143
This also applies to the US btw. And it's probably far higher amongs non whites.

>>507698605
I don't have a sisters, nor do I want one, but I think the relationship between brothers and sisters in literature and mythology is beautiful

Just like my Japanese animes

>>507699132
You're a horny freak who gets off to perversion, that's all

>>507699268
the purest form of love

>>507699304
>pure
>look inside
>rape

>>507698143
its all pakis

>>507699370
why are you homosexual?

Right and wrong is determined by God. And God said to not have sex with your sister.

Read Leviticus chapter 18.

>>507699394
Pakis do biological tests?

>>507697057 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Vy7cxBP0tOk

>>507697057 (OP)
>Isn't it okay as long as it is not repeated for generations?

Biologically, this is generally the case, though some dangerous recessive traits might have a high chance of being passed on in one generation. From a broader perspective though, all behaviors tend towards forming patterns of future behavior, especially when repeated over the large-scale population of a whole society. So sociologically it is better to have strong social taboos against the practice rather than endorse it as being "ok in moderation." The benefits of it being a taboo on the large scale far outweigh the benefits of it being considered acceptable.

>>507699603
hospital does.

>>507697057 (OP)
I don't see how it could be any more wrong than gay relationships as long as it is between two consenting adults. I don't think it should be encouraged, but it shouldn't be illegal either.

>>507699546
but god did not say don't have sex with your daughter in Leviticus 18.

>Isn't it okay as long as it is not repeated for generations?
How do you enforce that? Do we hand out incest passes if you can prove there hasn't been inbreeding in your family for several generations? Do we steralise the inbred? Or do we throw caution to the wind and just remove all restrictions, making society even more dysgenic when we've seen the consequences in Arabia and India?
>>507699546
Appeals to Judaism only convinces Jews. People don't fall for it anymore.

>>507699546
Abraham's wife was his half sister and god not only did nothing about it, he blessed them with a geriatric pregnancy. Lot nutted inside both his daughters ("they got him blackout drunk" yeah right he got rock hard while wasted out of his mind, I totally believe that), their sons founded nations. One of kang David's sons nutted into one of his daughters, he was killed, but not by god, by one of the other sons. In the book of kings one of the kings has the same mother and grandmother, meaning someone cummed into their own mom. Nothing happened to them. By their fruits shall ye know them and their family tree branches are very much tangled.

>>507697057 (OP)
Nice. Japan should be nicer to wincest families and pedos. It's a healthy good thing, impregnate all little girls and drive those birth rates back up again.

Who is older out of the son and daughter
I can't parse these stupid American education levels
>hey let's use a discontinuous scale - statements dreamt up by the utterly deranged

>>507697173
this

>>507697057 (OP)
Biologically speaking you would be correct.
The inital chance of something going wrong is really low, but it ramps up quickly.

>>507698605
It's true. I don't have a sister and I think it's a hot fantasy.
>>507699132
Most japanese don't have siblings and that's why it's so wide spread in hentai.
I still think fucking your mom is disgusting and I guess for people with siblings it's similar to that.

>>507699854
as i say here >>507699787 god is all good with getting sexy in the family... most of the time.

>>507699965
The daughter is 小6, the brother is 中2, hope that helps.

>>507699759
Mm you might be right. Still it's a huge number even considering immigrants. They should do the study in a over 90% majority white country to debunk it.

>>507700118
小学生って中学生の年下。全部分かった。

>>507699965
I think middle school is just the first half of secondary school, so the girl is probably about 12 and the boy around 14

>>507697057 (OP)
there isn't that much greater of a chance of birth defects if you breed with your first cousin than if you breed with a random stranger, and even less for first cousins once removed, second cousins, etc., to the point that the risk is negligible
banging your brother or sister is gross, and while banging your cousin is kind of weird I don't think it should be illegal or even taboo considering it's perfectly natural and normal I guess

Well it happens far more than people like to admit. My own cousins were fucking each other when they we're 13 and 15. -He admitted it to me when we were smoking weed about 13 years ago. I asked if he was never scared that she would get pregnant but the asshole secretly bought her pills instead of putting a condom on.

>>507700645
In America the cut off is at second cousin's. You can marry your second cousin but not your first.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=RW4vOpOEGhg

>>507700829
Suffice to say she was not much better. She even grabbed my cock back then and started to stroke it, but I pushed her away and she called me a fucking faggot. So no, im not shocked. In fact Im certain she was the one seducing him, initally.

>>507700485
>>507700591
Yep, and having read the article this situation is really sad, the son alone got punished and sent away, but there was no violence invoiced and was just mutual sexual curiosity that went too far. The daughter even told the mother that she wants her brother to live with them again. That irks me the most is that the mom isn't seen as being responsible for this. You can't just neglect your kids to this point, it makes you a bad parent.

>>507697057 (OP)
Let me explain since retards here suggests its less harmful than miscenegation.

In your genome you have two sets of every gene (a pair). Each set composed of one gene per parent. The exception is the XY chromosome in men which is why mental retardation, autism and so on is overrepresented among men.

Every human being have genes that are shit, but because we have two copied of each genes its not noticeable. Because there’s (almost always) always a healthy back up.

What happen when mom and dad are related? Well they will both carry genes that are the same, and so when their children will not have a healthy back up.

The negative result of brother/sister incest is rapid and noticeable already at the first generation of offspring. First cousin incest may take a few generations because they are not closely related, but eventually you end up with freaks like pic related eg a whole family that never learned to walk on two legs.

>>507701053
Its hormones. The problem was that they were both kids and didnt realize that a 12-13 yo girl is insanely fertile. Thats a taboo nowadays but the prime age for a girl to get pregnant is actually between 13 and 18. Yet in our society women over fucking 40 get pregnant with their first kids. And then we wonder why we degenerate as a species.

>>507701053
Incest and abuse is super common in japan. They do alot of beating around the bush to save face. The article and even the family is probably trying to downplay what was really going on in an attempt to lessen the shame.

Reminds me of the "dead nigger cave" they found in japan just a couple of years ago. It was an entire grave full of the skeletons of African American Marines that the locals had dumped into a cave.

The Marines would sneak into their village and raped a woman so to hide their shame they killed the Marines and dumped theor bodies into a cave and didn't tell anybody until a couple of years ago.

>>507699524
lmao

>>507701289
You forgot to mention telomeres.

>>507697057 (OP)
vomit. I beat my son black and blue

>>507701053
Society demands punishment for incest no matter what. Ironically, that causes more trauma.

>>507697057 (OP)
How do kids learn about sex so early? That hentai be bussin

>>507701558
More trauma than having the health complications for inbreeding?
People generally don't give a fuck and the police have to break up incestuous families all the time.

>>507700408
>They should do the study in a over 90% majority

that doesnt exist anymore my pastafren

>>507697057 (OP)
Because (((they))) don't want you to maintain your genes. Notice how it's frowned upon from a medical perspective but only when the couple already has some kind of inherited genetic abnormality that's passed on, having people insult them as inbred? Well, what if the couple have only good traits? That's also quite possible. Imagine the perfect facial symmetry, good health, blue or green eyes and blonde hair. Why the fuck wouldn't you want to keep passing on these genes in perpetuity? Why would you want to mix and muddy them with shitskins or inferior genes?

>>507700034
I have sisters and i think it is a hot fantasy but not with my actual sisters but fictional hot sisters that don't exist

>>507697057 (OP)
I ask you Tojo-san do you want more 4chan users?

>>507700591
they are both in middle school the boy is in 5th grade
the girls in 6th
the sad thing is that thats the best pussy he will ever get

>>507701864
No he is correct, the boy is 2nd year of junior high so that would make him around 14, and the daughter is in the 6th and last year of elementary school which would make her around 12.

>>507701686
Sadly true.

>>507701812
Yeah, my sisters are ugly so i don't really know what I'd do if they were good looking. The thing is, I've never seen my friends eying their hot sisters at the pool either. I grew up with girls in my neighborhood who were pretty. But I knew them so long they were like sisters and I rarely thought of them when I jerked off. Biology wants gene pool diversity, I guess.

>>507702076
yeah, I was having a moment there
but middle school is 6,7,8th grads
if she was in 6th grade than he was in 7th grad

Does it count if you only share one parent?

>>507698605
i jerk off to her bikini pics sometimes

>>507702306
>I knew them so long they were like sisters
it's because you have low t and they were disgusted by your feminine wrists hand hands

>>507697057 (OP)
Incest is legal in Spain (as in, you're not going to jail for fucking your mother as long as it's consensual and both are over 18) and yet you don't see same-family relationships, marriages or children. Society at large thinks it's gross as fuck to fuck your own family members.
>b-but that's propaganda! everyone secretly wants to fuck their own mother but society/religion doesn't let them!!!!1!
Incestfags always fall into this cope when pressured. It's the exact same cope faggots used back in the day to justify their bullshit.

Also radical feminism has been pro-incest for half a century now. Incestfags act like feminists and faggots.

And yes, I do have incestuous feelings but I don't delude myself. I am broken and a sick fuck and it's nobody's fault but mine.

>>507702720
>I do have incestuous feelings
Post sister feet pics

>>507697057 (OP)
I have already read this doujin

>>507698605
>Westermarck effect,
Is only a hypothesis, for very obvious reasons it's never been tested.

Incest is not wrong, inbreeding is.

Taboo, yes. But it doesn't make you literally Hitler for it.

>>507700118
草

>>507697057 (OP)
Incest is not wrong. Jews make the law so we can't create clans in modern age to fight them.

>>507702935
I mean Hitler was in a weird relationship with his step niece for years.

>>507699524
Thelma gives very good advice.
Fucking faggot complaining that his hot sister is blowing him.
Shake my head.

>>507697057 (OP)
Just like my hentai anime

>>507697057 (OP)
I'm against incest because my sister is ugly.

>>507697057 (OP)
100% tranime is responsible for this

>>507701289
That is overblown

>>507699105
Most likely, I used to speak to quite a few black girls and almost all of them said they were raped or sexually abused by their fathers.

>>507702720
>Society at large thinks it's gross as fuck to fuck your own family members
but thats why you dont see it
not because its legal or not
people keep that shit secret regardless
also, you never hear about because they aren't publishing it in the El Times because it's not illegal there for why would you even hear about it
you premise that incest doesn't exist in Spain is faulty

>>507702894
it's only for people with ugly siblings or shitty relationship

>>507697057 (OP)
sex shouldn't be stigmatized period, honestly who the fuck invented this shit, what is this jewish nonsense to shame sex. more people = better country, and the younger teens fuck the better. whites and east asians are dying out as is
I don't think niggers or brown monkeys give much thought where the baby came from or how old the mother was so why should we

>>507702894
actually, the Westermark effect was not fail proof in other later studies

>>507699268
Is this true?

>>507703224
Largest factor I think is actually relative sexual abuse. It kind of fucks up your sexual development in a lot of ways.

>>507702523
For americans maybe, in Japan it's different.

reminder
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julien_and_Marguerite_de_Ravalet

>>507703397
Is my point, I believe in it to an extent but negative sexual imprinting is a bit unbelievable when children at those ages just have terrible, terrible memory.

>>507703505
yeah

>>507703419
yes, germans are into a lot of weird shit like skat and incest. hitler's father dated his cousin and so did hitler

>>507702894
It has been tested actually.
The tl:dr; is that it's not genetic closeness that averts someone (otherwise GSA, genetic sexual attraction, wouldn't be a thing) it's closeness in growing up.
They're able to measure this due to some cultures having the norm of raising children together. Those who grew up in similar cohorts, i.e. raised together (and not related), had lower fertility than those who were raised apart (i.e. different cohort, usually separated by a year or more).
If you need help visualizing this, imagine all 5th graders are in one building and all 6th graders are in another building.
This separates "growing up together" like siblings do without the blood connection.

>>507702756
I'm an only child.
>>507703214
It's not the kind of thing that can be hidden. In Spain (and all of the Hispanic countries) children have the surname of their father and their mother.

A child born out of incest would have the same surname twice, for instance: "Smith Smith." Unless there's a big coverup to illegally change the surnames of such children, this isn't a thing.

There's been official investigations to measure the prevalence of incest and the numbers are consistent with what's seen in other countries. Not to mention, if incest was truly much more prevalent than it seems to be there would be rumors about that (just like there are rumors about drug use) but there are none.

The one thing I will concede is that in most Latin American countries people don't consider fucking your cousin (especially if it's a second cousin) to be incest. They see it as kind of weird, but not inherently bad.

>>507703821
>hey're able to measure this due to some cultures having the norm of raising children together.
Yeah I'm aware of this argument, that's not an empirical test. That's why it's still a hypothesis.

Originally, incest was outlawed for political reasons. It had nothing to do with muh inbreeding. It was to prevent notable families from consolidating too much power by forcing them to marry out. There's a reason jews are so inbred, they're the modern day aristocrats who refuse to marry out in order to keep all the money and power in their family. Also, incest doesn't make abominations from a generation or 2 as you have been told, this only happens over a long period of time. If you break 1 generation between each incest generation, it's completely harmless.

>>507703302
>I don't think niggers or brown monkeys give much thought where the baby came from or how old the mother was so why should we
>wanting the same reproduction strategy that monkeys and niggers use
good job sven.

>who cares about sex?! just fuck whoever!
this destroys the family structure as well as dating and relationships between men and women

>>507703731
It's not a matter of "memory". It's -years- of being together / basically your childhood.
If you have siblings who grew up apart let's say due to divorcing parents, this largely wouldn't affect you.

>>507703649
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julien_and_Marguerite_de_Ravalet
that was a common charge to get rid of people during those times
Ann Boline was accused of incest with her brother and they were both executed
now its pedo

>>507697057 (OP)
Can i get a link,
Theres literally nothing wrong with it.

>>507703933
What constitutes a test to you?
>here try to fuck your sibling and see if you can get it up
If you're going to posit that looking at fertility rates isn't enough of a correlation for you, and you demand a test, you must be able to at least articulate what you would be willing to accept.
Or at least, rather than saying "it hasn't been tested", instead say "it's un-testable".

>>507703419
>>507703791
the shit its alluding to is german slovakian tales of knights and kingdoms, basically what Game of thrones was based on.
Royalty regularly resorted to incest to reconcile power and lands. Look up "habsburg"

>>507703964
>It's -years- of being together / basically your childhood.
That's not the hypothesis for the Westermarck effect though, it's specifically for the earliest years of childhood development. 1 to 6 years old. With further cohabitation reinforcing negative sexual imprinting.

>>507704026
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/7d57b3147614e341628f3e49672cc813a27454f2

I don't know if it can be accessed from the United States

>>507703954
Apparently in Egypt it was normal even for commoners to marry as siblings and have children. The reason that didn't lead to bad regressive genes was because of high child mortality, so unlike the nobles who could afford better care even for their weaker children, the weaker genes were being bred out with the commoners. That's also a reason why inbreeding today would be worse than in older times.

>>507697057 (OP)
>faggotry
>cuckoldry
>trannyism
>incest
/pol/warned me we were heading here 20 years ago.

>>507704157
Yeah, I'm saying that children don't actually forget those years, it just gets merged into your subconscious, similar to attachment style.

>>507704079
>instead say "it's un-testable".
>>507702894
>for very obvious reasons it's never been tested.
The fuck do you think I meant? And yes sadly that is the only way to test it, it's why a lot of sexuality phenomenon are hypotheses, because there's no ethical way to test it (and neither would I advocate for it).

I was in a long term incestuous relationship and I can tell you it doesn't come from a healthy place. Maybe making it illegal is wrong but I don't think we should condone it.

>>507703933
the Westermark effect is a good explanation but there will always be variance
obviously, incest occurs

>>507704176
even though incest is hated by lgbtq "people" and normalfaggots

I kinda feel attracted to my cousin. Am I a pervert bros?

>>507704412
ask your ancestors

>>507700889
yeah you can fuck your first cousins as much as you want though, and correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think there are any laws against getting them pregnant

>>507697057 (OP)
Inbreeding being bad is like 90% a psyop. The only negative element is that it reinforces certain genetic traits. That's why Amish look mostly normal and very similar to each other but do have higher rates of some genetic disorders. It's not caused by low genetic variation/inbreeding, it's just that the gene pool they came from had a higher amount of those to start with. They all descend from a gene pool of 500 people.

If you start with some genetic freaks, then you will get more genetic freaks, like Charles II. So avoiding inbreeding might be ideal if you're a genetic freak. However, if you're not, then outbreeding depression is going to do more harm. Mixing in nigger genes is almost never going to be beneficial.

>>507704412
kissing cousins is a thing

>>507704338
>the Westermark effect is a good explanation
Yeah but it's like using a hammer as a screwdriver, it's an inelegant explanation that requires fairly frequent revision because too many factors are uncontrolled or unaccounted for as evidence.

>>507704412
no problem

>>507704412
>Am I a pervert bros?
Depends is she hot?

>>507704412
Always ask your ancestors. Never listen to feminists, jews, or globalists.

>why is incest wrong

OP gutting you and burning you alive isn't wrong.

>>507697057 (OP)

Because it makes you retarded. Inbreeding causes retards.

I am not sure I disagree with certain cousins. Except defects are passed through any hereditary at much bigger rates.

But for the sake of how humanity evolved is it contrary to blood lines. It could insures success and prominence. Especially if it's successful. A household expands its standing or clan.

Brother sister daughter son mother dad is retarded. Certain second cousins hmm dubious?

>marrying your sister
isn't marriage about 2 people becoming family?

>>507700034
I actually have three sisters and I find out the idea of incest hilarious. My elder sister and I always would watch anime scenes where there's incest between siblings and laugh about it really.

>>507704829
>Certain second cousins hmm dubious?
Bismillah.

>>507704618
well, it does a good job of explaining why you're not attracted to close brood mates or care givers
it has also been observed in other animals
it doesn't prohibit incest just make it much less likely
human sexuality is complex and if we think of it on a spectrum then there will be deviations from the mean in a % what that % is we dont know but that recent Scottish study shows its much higher than we thought

>tl;dr
>fuck your sister

>>507704927

No. Humanity evolved from tribe. Expanding a successful clan becomes what? Genetics. However the downside are defects. Hereditary defects passed through bloodlines.

For the sake of any debate are second or third cousins absurd? No. Not in a majority of the Globe.

In fact today it's retarded anyway.

>>507704829
>Inbreeding causes retards
only after multiple generational instances
the most common problem is pulmonary issues
actually

>>507703954
>incest doesn't make abominations from a generation or 2
this also makes me curious because if they were all inbred retards, how did they rule over advancing civilizations

>>507697057 (OP)
>>507704591
There is a mechanism called genetic purging which happens when you inbreed.
Of course some species are more resilient towards it due to chromosomal make-up, but in general this is what would happen:
Due to diverse genetic distribution across the population, due to no inbreeding and a lot of diversity in the within-nation breeding spread across the country. This introduces multiple "faults", however they are usually recessive meaning you need someone with a similar genetic make-up for it to activate due to the multiple alleles needed.
So when you then inbreed as a human, what happens is that those alleles are able to potentiate and you end up with genetic monstrosities with severely debilitating outcomes. Some only have minor ones, or ones that come to fruition later in life.
That being said, if you keep doing this, maybe try for 5-8 kids worth of genetic lottery, you will end up with one or two who is normal enough to function. This then, when breeding with another inbred (from a different family) will have less of a genetic burden. Then you inbreed again.
By doing this you are purging out the detrimental genetic parts. By selecting for really bad outcomes by putting a strain on the selection of alleles, the ones that end up working have no- or a significantly reduced likelihood of having defects at all, inbreeding or not.
Keep doing this and you will have purged the genetic profile of the lineage.

>>507699546
Incest is how we got from Adam and Eve to Noah, and from Noah to Moses. Why did God suddenly decide it wasn't okay? Or were those rules only meant for the Israelites?

>>507705279
Because it was clearly bullshit. Why would people in power, who were the most advanced, educated, and selfish, do anything to harm their own interests?

>>507697057 (OP)
>>507704159
Why wouldn't it be accessible in the United States? I made that thread originally, hence why the article was translated to English.

>>507705279
>how did they rule over advancing civilizations
Usually that ended because their families collapsed from an accumulation of hereditary conditions.

>>507704591
Your understanding of genetics is elementary to the extreme.

When the sperm and egg chromosomes first meet they line themselves up and twist around to swap genes from one to the other. So you may inherit your chromosome 24 from your grandfather, but small parts of it would be from your grandmother. They call this crossing over.

When you have high consanguinity (relatedness) it confuses the process and things have a hard time lining up properly and you end up with a much higher chance of duplicating genes and missing genes from your chromosomes.

We know from extensive animal husbandry that some interbreeding is actually beneficial, but never with someone with more than 25% consanguinity, and even then it should be more like a once in every 6 generations sort of thing. For a 12.5% consanguinity it would be best not to have that inbreeding more than once every 3 generations or so.

>>507705279
well, they usually weren't retarded that a popular myth reinforced by popular culture, but they had a multitude of other health conditions

>>507705418
I heard that Yahoo Japan cannot be accessed from the EU

>>507705228

It's a simple statement not a retarded one. Where I've explained hereditary defects ate passed through bloodlines at much quicker rates the chromosomes pair increasing instead of being pedigree it becomes dullards.

>>507701313
Basic underrated truth

>>507704829
>Because it makes you retarded. Inbreeding causes retards.
You get retards even with no inbreeding. It would take several generations of inbreeding with bad genes to get a Charles II

>>507705563
>25% consanguinity
does this mean shared grandparents or shared great grandparents? I assume 100% would be brother/sister, and 50% = first cousins?
>t. retard go ez on me plz

>>507705805
>It's a simple statement not a retarded one
most people are retarded how does that factor into your hypothesis

>>507703302
Wow you're out of touch. Less sex stigma = less births
Developed countries like Japan or the US that were very promiscuous now have the least reproduction.
But the ultimate factor that kills births is urbanization. Only rural people with no condoms and arranged marriages as young as possible have ever had/ have high birth rates

>>507703731
Clearly you can learn things without remembering. Do you remember learning to speak english?

>>507705288
I forgot to add that even if it is not apparent because of the "we are all one human race" movement, there are other problems of super diversifying your genetic population.
Mixed-race individuals often have issues finding blood and organ transplants due to differences in human leukocyte antigen makeup, making them incompatible to the common distributions of HLA in bloodbanks.

In a sense, the multiculturalism of the world has kind of started a new era of evolution.
Where the evolutionary pressure has once again been put on the human race. Many of the mixed diversity will have unfavorable genetic expressions for their survival, but it will also lead to improvements for those that do survive.
Now, the problem is modern science where they cause these issues to be a non-issue by medicine and intervention.

So what we will see is a general decline in public health services due to an increase in inquiries for interventions.
This will also then affect the part of the population that are not a cause of the influx.
Then due to poor health of the population, the work market will be affected, and in turn economy and services.
A national decline will happen over many years, until the health sector either becomes corrupt and the rich and successful (implying they have not been deeply affected by their genetics) or the sickly will die off due to lowered quality of life and health institutions declining.
This will then create an increase in stability within the country and cause productivity to surge leading to golden years of improvement.

>>507706104
>very promiscuous now have the least reproduction
he doesn't know about birth control

>>507702720
>Also radical feminism has been pro-incest for half a century now
Are they? When you speak of radical feminists, do you mean the actual radical ones -TERF- that are aware of the nature of man and women -like we are here- but simply come up with incorrect explanations? Or do you mean third wave "radical" feminist that actually just globalists?

>>507701321
>Reminds me of the "dead nigger cave" they found in japan just a couple of years ago
1997
>It was an entire grave full of the skeletons of African American Marines
There were only 3
>The Marines would sneak into their village and raped a woman
It happened in 1945, they would return to the village multiple times to rape the women. Eventually they had enough, ambushed and killed them. They hid their bodies because they feared American reprisals. Eventually (52 years later) one of the witnesses felt too much and told the Americans what happened. Nobody was persecuted for it.

>>507705827

We have a generation of retards today. They're so utterly contrary to anything resembling their heritage anyway, and most are autistic.

For the sake of a simple statement and simple domestication. The problem is defects increasingly pair through the chromosomes becoming problematic. Hence the coin of phrase; Retards are the product of incest. The same traits and features becoming more and more inbred and dumb. It can lead to a lack of immunities. Or what not and whatever.

My statement was questioning certain cousins in regards to a massive population in the rest of the globe without today's population control which has only curtailed its nationals. I debated human evolution from tribe or clan or bloodline and any debate on some restriction seems odd or misplaced apart from it destroying heritage.

>>507697057 (OP)
Incest is always wrong, PFC Patel.

>>507705797
true

>>507706429
>We have a generation of retards today. They're so utterly contrary to anything resembling their heritage anyway, and most are autistic.
It's not about the genes, but about how they are raised

I wouldn't fuck my sister but I got a BJ from my cousin once

>>507697057 (OP)
she won

>>507706156
>Do you remember learning to speak english?
It's an accumulation of knowledge that requires repetition to maintain.

Quite a few children will be able to be conversational in a language which they will forget if not sustained.

>>507705957
The chart is from a first person perspective. It shows your relatedness to your children, your siblings, your parents etc.

And while it has nice precise numbers, you should be aware that there is some randomness involved with some of the relations. You get almost exactly 50% of genes from each parent, but with your siblings you may share somewhere between 40% and 60% of your genes. And this can cause a compounding error the farther it goes out. So your cousins on average would be 12.5% shared genes, but really it could be quite a bit different like 7% to 18%.

https://www.thetech.org/ask-a-geneticist/articles/2013/siblings-are-around-fifty-percent-related/

>>507706547

I think a mixed gene pool to today's mongrelisation isn't helping it much either? I might be wrong. You tell me

>>507706737
>after the ban of incest in japan's media
how did she do it?

>>507702306
It's not that they are ugly, most people think they are hot. But i can't see them as anything other than my sisters.