>>507728588>What advantage does an antimatter weapon have over a nuke?The famous equation E=MC2 shows, that matter and energy are esentially the same thing, just in different states.
Given that the left side of the equation is multiplying a huge big ass number (lightspeed squared) to the Matter part shows, that in every kind of matter enormous amounts of engery are be stored.
We cannot simply release this energy. With ordinary chemical bombs, only a very tiny amount of that matter is converted into energy. Nuklear bombs are more affective, but also one transport a part of all matter into energy. The Sun with its nuclear fusion process is a bit better. That's why we want to build fusion reactors on earth so desperately, but it seems a never ending serious of failure.
The absolute only way to release 100% of the energy stored in matter is, when you combine it with antimatter of the same amount. The entire matter will vanish and realeases a huge amount of energy.
That being said, there are no antimatter bombs and this topic is gay and fake. Scientists has successfully created antimatter in labs like CERN, but only in a very tiny amount, far off from being any kind of danger. And even that is extremely expensive.
Fun fact: It is still a mystery, why almost all matter in the universe is normal matter, and why there is barely any antimatter in the universe.
By the way, faggots like this are roaming /pol/ for whatever reason. They are so mentally disabelt, that they rather call everything fake (in this case also nuclear bombs), than admiting, they stoped their level of education after elementare school.
>>507729470>neither are real
