← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 507740225

12 posts 8 images 12 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: J+rz3xfp) United States No.507740225 >>507740448 >>507740741 >>507740897 >>507740968 >>507741094 >>507741530 >>507741603 >>507742464
I'll just leave this here
Anonymous (ID: UrNDSSTA) United States No.507740324
WE ARE MAKING ISRAEL GREAT AGAIN!
Anonymous (ID: ai6BMGxp) United States No.507740448
>>507740225 (OP)
That is why they keep bombing Iran's nuke programs. They are not letting them complete the needed research.
Didn't you know that?
Anonymous (ID: p3pmm/GD) Canada No.507740741
>>507740225 (OP)
2 more weeks
Anonymous (ID: ZoKbcMSn) No.507740897
>>507740225 (OP)
doesn't really debunk anything

he was saying the truth, but mossad sabotage allowed them to keep stalling
problem, is that it was no longer enough, in 2026 they'd gotten nukes due to China's help which they didn't count on in 1992
Anonymous (ID: hpMRtwiC) United States No.507740968
>>507740225 (OP)
Well yes, when you subvert the Iranian nuclear program by assassinating its scientists and destroying its centrifuges that tends to set it back a good number of years.
Anonymous (ID: lUNNJU2I) United States No.507741094
>>507740225 (OP)
I'm gonna need to see some yellow cake nigga.
Anonymous (ID: SfxkJgzl) United States No.507741410
This only sounds retarded because you don’t know anything about how building a nuclear bomb works. You imagine it’s like a constant scale time horizon where you progress and progress at some rate and then you have one. In reality, the time any one country is away from a nuclear bomb depends entirely on the pace at which they choose to move. If a country can generate nuclear energy, they can develop a nuclear bomb within months if they really wanted to. At the same time, if they can generate nuclear energy but aren’t, for example, enriching uranium at a rate that would allow them to have a bomb within a few months and that rate holds then it would take longer than a few months. So when Israel intelligence says Iran is close to a nuclear bomb, they’re telling the truth. If Iran really wanted to, they could have nuclear bombs this year. And when America says Iran isn’t that close to a nuclear bomb, they’re also telling the truth. The current rate of enrichment isn’t fast enough to have it within the year. So both sides are just making different assumptions about the speed they’ll move out and predicting when they’ll have a bomb. Neither assumption can be known and so both are right and wrong at the same time.

This is one of the many reasons why after all this time, politicians still freak out over century old weapons technology. We are putting railguns in space and building directed energy weapons, but we’re still worried about nuclear warheads because currently, there is no really good way to prevent missile strikes, no missile strike more destructive than a nuclear missile strike, and no guaranteed way to accurately predict when a nuclear-capable country will decide to acquire them.
Anonymous (ID: TnRrpMYF) United States No.507741530 >>507742140
>>507740225 (OP)
>Just two more weeks, bro
Anonymous (ID: AuQvzpi6) United Kingdom No.507741603
>>507740225 (OP)
Well then goy, the attack is obviously clearly justified. Why would you not trust the leader of g_d's chosen people
Anonymous (ID: 28u+o9GL) Hungary No.507742140
>>507741530
Jews lie incoherently, but it's not a problem, because the goyim are cattle and their memory is short.
Anonymous (ID: HtS/uLOu) United States No.507742464
>>507740225 (OP)
SUITCASE NUKES!!!
Yeah they’ve been repeating the same shit for decades without pushback or criticism because to do so is career suicide and antisemitism