Thread 507823543

It is set to be decommissioned in may 2026, less than a year from now. Could this deployment of the rusty old Aircraft Carrier being sent close to Iran be a false flag or bait attack event, that drags the US into the war on behalf of Israel ?
It is only 4 days away from being deployed in the region.

>>507823543 (OP)
meh
they said it was will be still used for another 10 years
also, there is a 2nd carrier with it,
funny how you tinfoil fucktards dont mention that part.

i always wondered if you sunk one of them wouldnt it be like a Chernobyl right on your shore since they’re run on nuclear reactors

>>507823543 (OP)
>Could an attack on the USS Nimitz be the 'New Pearl Harbor' event ?
How could it when everyone already knows Israel attacked Iran first? Pearl Harbor was an unprovoked attack, this would be justified retaliation. When someone is coming to kick your ass, you've got the right to defend yourself. A fleet minding its own business in port being attacked is different than a fleet coming to start a war being attacked is. Even normies won't fall for this.

>>507823543 (OP)
Abrahamism's staying power goes to show that humans are inherently flawed when they'd rather trust schizo ramblings over a human child.

>>507823777
>wouldnt it be like a Chernobyl
On a much smaller scale, maybe. The nuclear reactor is much smaller. Also, since it would sink I guess mostly it would be the deep ocean that would get fucked up.

>>507823876
Yeah, didnt consider that. But then again normies still watch tv, so its still very possible.

>>507823777
Never ask Robert Ballard how he got funding to find the Titanic right before James Cameron made Titanic. Especially don't ask why James Cameron made The Abyss include lose nuclear subs. All just cohencidence.

>>507823777
So what? There's a bunch of nuclear powered subs that have sunk and you're fine

It's a pity the Enterprise won't launch till November and won't be commissioned till 2029. She'll miss all the action

>>507823543 (OP)
No one would care, genuinely. This isn’t the 1940’s. Boomers and ZOGbots would throw a fit but beyond that your avg person would either be apathetic, see it as a sign of the decline of the American empire or just say “oh that’s sad”. Even right-wing types would say it’s a pretty blatant false flag.

>>507823543 (OP)
Let's hope so

>>507823543 (OP)
this is the cook on the ship, Iran better watch out

>>507823993
>>507824111
but if it got violently blowed up first itd be everywhere
>>507824108
or what the cia did with k129 or how it sunk in the first place

>>507824108
Would the US gov care enough to fund them (i mean probably) they already had Project Azorian and it's predecessor Project Mohole (sorta Azorian obviously being a one-off vs Mohole being an 'abandoned' ongoing thing) in the 10-20 years before that.

>>507823543 (OP)
we prefer to see it as a new "USS Liberty" event.

>>507823543 (OP)
Afraid that might be the plan. Some anon said Melania's inaugural outfit was a coded message for a major naval disaster coming to challenge the Trump admin.

>>507823543 (OP)
If Israel Liberties the USS Robert Murtaugh then it will look mighty sus

>>507823543 (OP)
They are moving aircraft carries to be sunk by israel as we speak

>>507823543 (OP)
I don't think there could be any attack on the US in which I didn't immediately suspect it to be a mossad-orchestrated false flag. For that matter, in hindsight, I half suspect the jews had a hand in setting up Pearl Harbor too.

>>507824440
It's 100k tons of steel bro not a lego set, it's not gunna explode all over the place, it's just gunna list then sink lol

>>507823876
>unprovoked attack
Thats a weird way to spell "the U.S. was supplying arms and materials to their allies during wartime and literally using civilian ships to transport them across the ocean".

>>507824392
RIP, you

>>507823543 (OP)
Historically speaking, sinking of a boat has been a great false flag to get the USA into a war.

USS MAINE Sinking: Spanish-American War

Lusitania sinking: WWI

Pearl Harbor: WWII

Gulf of Tonkin incident/boat sinking: Vietnam War

really the only wars in the past 150 years that didn't involve the sinking of a boat to get us involved were Gulf Wars 1 and 2

>>507825010
kind of strange that the japanese skipped straight to a direct and unfathomably provocative attack against the US on american soil instead of capturing the civilian cargo ships and taking/dumping their cargo as a warning first, innit?

>>507825067
USS TACO this time

>>507824957
you dont know that

>>507823543 (OP)
Look up “Millennium Challenge”

It was a war game run by the Pentagon in early 2000s, spent $250 million

The conclusion?

Iran fights a defensive war and sinks a number of US ships and the US is handed a defeat. If I read correctly they had changed the rules in order to have the US win…

>>507823543 (OP)
idgaf
not my problem