>>507872735Why? He is giving him an audience to spread redpills, even if he doesn't agree or endorse him.
>>507872895I would much rather given an argumentative interviewer than the usual censor + deplatform treatment.
Plus it is hard to broadcast Nick with endorsement unless you want to be subjected to the same insane persecution he is going through.
>>507873025Nick is one of the few alt right figures I trust not to glow.
>>507873110That's disappointing if true.